tech

Unofficial, machine-generated summaries, as of 2026-11-09.

Dr. Jon KrohnNew Opportunities for AI Startups in 2025 (with Shaun Johnson)
  • Crowded "red ocean" markets still reward insightful founders. Johnson says opportunities exist across the spectrum from consensus to non-consensus applications, as they did in SaaS five years ago. He disputes investors who call AI coding too crowded with Cursor, Windsurf and Cognition. Incumbents that grow big become ripe for disruption, he says, citing Lovable reportedly disrupting Cursor and Windsurf, and AIX is about to back a team entering a red ocean.
  • Deep, specific domain backgrounds make overlooked verticals compelling. He cites a founder innovating in one narrow area of consumer-packaged-goods product development. That founder's background matched the problem unusually closely.
Crosstalk SolutionsGiveaway! Win This Alta Labs NFR Kit!
  • NFR kits give installers the margin MSRP pricing leaves out. The host says installers buying at MSRP end up paying for their own time on warranty and RMA work; a not-for-resale kit lets prospective resellers buy and learn a vendor's gear at a steep discount.
  • Alta Labs' kit costs $399 against a $636 MSRP. It includes the Route10 gateway (four 2.5 Gbps RJ45, two PoE, two 10 Gbps SFP+), the S8-POE switch (8 gigabit ports, four PoE+), an AP6 (2x2 Wi-Fi 6) and AP6 Pro (4x4). It requires joining the reseller program; code "crosstalk" takes $10 off. The host is giving one away, winner picked June 27.
Dr. Jon KrohnHow to Future-Proof Your Career in the Age of AI (with Shaun Johnson)
  • In the short term, become an advocate for AI. The host frames the question with roughly 6,000 Microsoft layoffs, reportedly mostly software engineers, in the week before recording. Johnson's first advice is to treat AI as a thinking partner that helps generate solutions, not a passive tool like a spreadsheet macro.
  • Longer term, move toward human-to-human touch points. Johnson says AIX expects digital work to be transformed while robotics stays far off. In his view humanoid robots need two or three major research breakthroughs. Roles in outbound sales, client work and contact with senior leadership will therefore stay valuable for a long time.
GCastDeleting a GitHub Repository [GCast 196]
  • Deleting a repository is deliberately hidden in its Settings. From the repo's Settings button, the option sits at the very bottom in the "Danger Zone", where irreversible actions are outlined in red with red buttons. Giard says he made the video because the feature is not at all obvious, and judges it hidden by design so nobody deletes a repository by accident.
  • GitHub stacks several confirmations before the delete goes through. After "Delete this repository", it asks him to confirm the repository, then warns that deletion is permanent with no undelete option, then asks him to type the owner/repository name. He shows that the name can be copied and pasted rather than typed.
  • With two-factor authentication on, a final approval comes from the phone. Because his account uses two-factor authentication, GitHub asks him to approve in the GitHub Mobile app using a number shown on screen, which changes every time; entering a password is offered as an alternative. Once he approves, the portal shows a message that the repository was deleted.
Dr. Jon KrohnWhy Enterprises Struggle to Implement AI — and How to Fix It
  • Enterprise AI should start from a map of actual tasks. Johnson says enterprises mostly adopt AI because of media hype or board pressure on the C-suite. WorkHelix instead surfaces jobs and tasks from an enterprise's raw data and maps bundles of tasks to generative-AI solutions. It then measures efficacy in a proper A/B test and reassesses. Clients learn, for example, that marketing holds far more manual work than they thought. The host cites a co-founder's claim that this could unlock a trillion-dollar opportunity.
  • Behavioural friction explains the rush into AI rollups. Johnson says investors buy service-heavy companies and run them on AI-native systems because changing an existing enterprise's behaviour is so hard. AI startups' professional-services line items reflect the same friction. One CEO told him the firm had to mandate AI use: "every Friday is AI day."
Technology and FriendsScott Hanselman on New Technology and Old Friends [EPISODE 855]
  • A podcast turns "pick your brain" requests into a lasting artifact. Hanselman, who started Hanselminutes in April 2007, says a coffee meeting "dissipates like a mist", while an episode persists and can be transcribed and shared. For roughly the last three years he has asked guests whether they are in a good headspace to record. Over a few hundred shows, about five said no and rescheduled.
  • AI semantic search let him query his own past opinions. At Build he and Yina Arenas built an AI chat search over his transcripts, covering more than a thousand episodes. Asked how his views on AI evolved, it answered that he has been "consistently cautiously optimistic but concerned about the ethics". He agrees, while noting his questions may have biased it.
  • AIs are people-pleasing interns, not fact generators. Hanselman says models are eager to give the answer a leading question implies and can confirm a user's bias, so sources must be checked. He cites a Mark Russinovich demo: telling a model the host won a podcast award gets an ungrounded model to invent ceremony quotes. A web-grounded model that finds no evidence can then be "gaslit" into accepting it.
  • Use AI as a research assistant, not as the author. Hanselman's wife, a nurse, was offended when told to have ChatGPT write a coworker's recommendation, because it cheapens it. Giard says an AI draft of a colleague's feedback reminded him of contributions he had forgotten or never knew, which he then wrote in himself. Hanselman endorses gathering facts this way but asks whether letting AIs write and read letters just cuts people out, calling these ethical rather than technical questions. Giard adds that he accepts AI for outlines, grammar and style but keeps the thinking his own.
  • Early-career people should work one layer below their usual level. Hanselman's examples: open a laptop and add RAM, use the command line, or write some C if you only write JavaScript. He suggests running a model locally with LM Studio, the AI Toolkit for VS Code or Foundry Local, in airplane mode, and watching whether it uses the CPU or GPU. His barbecue story: an overheated iPhone charged at one watt until he set it on an ice-covered plate and it rose to 25 watts, as shown by a USB-C cable with a wattage screen.
Dr. Jon Krohn896: AI (Probably) Isn’t Taking Your Job (At Least Anytime Soon) — with Jon Krohn @JonKrohnLearns
  • Headline cases of AI job loss don't survive the data. The host notes an Oxford paper by Carl Benedikt Frey and Pedro Llanos-Paredes linking automation to falling demand for translators. Yet official US data show employment in interpretation and translation up 7% year over year. Klarna, which boasted of automating customer service, has reversed course; its CEO now says "there will always be a human if you want."
  • Young graduates' joblessness predates ChatGPT. The host says their unemployment relative to the US average began rising in 2009, 15 years before ChatGPT. Their actual unemployment rate, around 6%, is low by historical standards.
  • Aggregate labour data show no AI-driven collapse. Per the host, the white-collar share of US employment rose slightly over the past year. US unemployment is 4.2% with reasonably strong wage growth, earnings growth in Britain, the euro area and Japan is robust, and the OECD employment rate hit an all-time high in 2024.
  • Low adoption and augmentation explain the gap. The host cites an official measure that under 10% of American companies use AI to produce goods and services. Where firms do adopt it, they mostly use it to help workers rather than fire them. He calls this an opportunity for practitioners, with more companies still needing help than already served.
  • Collaborate with AI rather than compete against it. The host's own view is that there is no imminent jobs crisis, though AI will change work. He advises experimenting daily with the latest LLMs; his favourite for general work is Anthropic's Claude Opus 4, and he uses OpenAI's deep research for his hardest problems.
Scott HanselmanStartup Mindsets with Earl Valencia
synopsis

Valencia, co-author with Dan Gonzalez of Startup Mindsets, argues that founding a company is a long, lucky, high-risk grind that only makes sense if you are tied to a problem you would work on even if it failed. His book is meant to make would-be founders ask that question before they quit their jobs.

Why, not how. Valencia grew up in the Philippines, studied aerospace engineering and found the startup world at Stanford business school. He says most startup books cover how, not whether. His team asked hundreds of Series B-and-below founders why they started and whether failure would bring regret. Most cited something personal and said no. A mission or impact statement, he argues, is what guides hiring, investor and technology choices through the grind.

Mindset and myths. He defines the startup mindset as long-term thinking plus tolerance of risk for later scale. He concedes that traditional businesses often earn more at lower risk. Silicon Valley's advantage, in his account, is talent, hyper-connectivity and a risk-tolerant culture that accepts equity over cash, ingredients other places could replicate. Asian press coverage, he says, tends to highlight success where he wanted to highlight the journey.

Founders and funding. He separates entrepreneurs from "wantrepreneurs" by bias for action. Taking investors' money, he says, is a three-to-five-year duty. He walks through the funding stages, from pre-seed and seed ("valley of death") to a Series A now needing about $1 million projected run rate and 10–15% monthly growth. Investors back trust and mission-market-founder fit, and domain expertise paired with technology makes a "betable" company. He ends on his chapter 15: it is a marathon, and the market has corrected away from quick acquisitions.

  • Not everyone should found a startup; the book asks why, not how. Valencia, co-author of Startup Mindsets with Dan Gonzalez, says plenty of books cover how to build a startup but few ask whether you should, and that keeping AI out of the title was deliberate. In interviews with hundreds of Series B-and-below founders, most said they started over something personal and would not regret it if the company failed.
  • A mission statement is what gets founders through the grind. Once dismissive of vision, mission and values as an engineer, Valencia says running his own company showed him they settle the hard calls: a capable hire who doesn't share your values, an investor focused only on returns, technology that may be harmful. Without one, he argues, it is easy to quit in the rough times.
  • The startup mindset is long-term thinking plus deliberate risk tolerance. He contrasts a traditional business's steady, linear return with a startup's months or years of losses before hoped-for exponential growth. He stresses that traditional businesses often make more money than tech startups at lower risk, and that founders need "intellectual humility" because success owes much to luck and timing.
  • Entrepreneurs show a bias for action; "wantrepreneurs" just pitch ideas. His test is whether someone who pitched him three months ago has anything to show. He calls venture money a responsibility rather than a lottery ticket: selling even 1% of the company means a commitment of at least three to five years.
  • Investors back trust and founder-market fit, not just ideas. He relays Eric Schmidt's line from a Stanford venture class that investing happens when "greed overcomes fear", and says investors de-risk by trusting the person and by whether this team fits this problem. He puts today's Series A bar at about $1 million projected annual run rate growing 10–15% a month, and calls pre-seed and seed the "valley of death".
Crosstalk SolutionsHosted UniFi? Try this Easy Set-inform Script Today!
  • A one-line script set-informs every unadopted device on a subnet. Hosted UniFi controllers need each local device told where to call home via the SSH set-inform command, which is slow by hand or through HostiFi's GUI at 100 devices. The host points to a script from a Ubiquiti employee that scans the local subnet and does the SSH for all of them.
GCastCreating a GitHub Repository [GCast 195]
  • A new repository needs an owner and a name unique to that owner. Giard clicks the green New button at the top right of the GitHub portal. He skips the available templates, picks himself as owner from the accounts he has permissions on, and GitHub reports whether the name is available. A description is optional.
  • Public repositories are visible to anyone; private ones need granted permission. He makes his demo repository public because it contains nothing secret, and says a public repository should probably also get a license.
  • README, .gitignore and license files can be generated at creation. The README is a Markdown file explaining the repository's purpose, contents and how to install and use any code. The .gitignore keeps out files that should not be checked in — binaries, files specific to your own IDE, and files holding passwords or connection strings — and can come from a language template; he picks Python. Licenses range from "100% belongs to me" to free use; he picks MIT.
  • The generated files can be edited directly in the portal. He edits the README in the browser and commits it with a commit message, and the change shows on the repository page. He calls the result a starter that you would normally bring down to your own computer to build on and collaborate.
Dr. Jon KrohnHeat-Seeking vs. Truffle-Hunting: Two Winning VC Strategies (with Shaun Johnson)
  • Hot consensus deals rarely produce a fund's best returns. Johnson defines heat-seeking as backing deals the venture market already knows and loves, which makes them pricier. He cites an adage that the trends hot in any fund vintage are unlikely to be its alpha returners.
  • Non-consensus "truffle hunting" bets are cheaper with bigger upside. These are companies investors don't know, or know but don't believe. Johnson says a portfolio needs both kinds. After ChatGPT in November 2022 everything turned consensus quickly, forcing each fund to choose whether to diversify or lean in. AIX holds both.
Dr. Jon KrohnWhat Makes a Good AI Startup Founder? (with Shaun Johnson)
  • Early-stage investing backs people who can pivot fast. Johnson says VCs are not genius market timers. Founders learn and pivot, micro and macro, so AIX backs teams that execute "at the speed of light" until they find the point where their offering resonates with the market.
  • Teams are scored on AI nativeness and market savviness. Rarely optimal on both, a team strong in AI but weak commercially gets de-risked with advisors. Right after an inflection like ChatGPT, consensus applications such as AI tutoring favour extremely AI-native teams. As the technology commoditises, as the SaaS stack did, non-consensus market insight matters more. A transformer replacement would restart the cycle.
  • Builders who read papers beat a dedicated research co-founder. Johnson rejects the host's three-legged stool of CEO, CTO and AI expert. Drawing on his last team at LILT, he prefers production AI engineers savvy enough to read and integrate new papers over "a PhD that can just sit there and read papers".
Scott HanselmanAI and visualizing multidimensional vectors with Pamela Fox
synopsis

Fox, a principal cloud advocate focusing on Python at Microsoft, walks Hanselman from the intuition behind vector embeddings to how they behave in retrieval systems. She ends on what she thinks ordinary users need: not how vectors work, but whether an answer came from the model's weights or from sources it cites and they can check.

Language and code. Fox says Python went from underdog when she joined Microsoft about three years ago to the first language to get an SDK for new Microsoft technologies, because of AI. A linguistics minor who took compilers alongside syntax, drawing parse trees for both, she says LLMs let her bring language into programming, though she wishes she had paid more attention in linear algebra.

What embeddings are. Fox explains embeddings as vectors whose closeness comes from shared contexts in the training corpus. The dimensions are unnamed and reduced from countless possible descriptors, and Hanselman suggests formality is one of them. The relationships depend on the data and how it was fed in. Her examples are a Reddit username that got its own token in early GPT models, and the later practice of a second pass on cleaner data. One OpenAI model was large enough that the PostgreSQL extension pgvector had to raise its 2,000-number limit.

Who is represented. For a multilingual app, the right model depends on users: Fox favours multilingual models in the US but would pick a specialist for a Chinese-only audience. Nomic's figures show how little some languages get, from 234 million English pairs down to 16,000 for Yoruba. Hanselman raises a University of Venda contact asking when Copilot would speak Venda, and who should own and set the bias of models for indigenous languages.

Retrieval in practice. Fox describes chunking, embedding and storing documents with citation metadata. She recommends hybrid vector-plus-keyword search, because vector search always returns something. Temporal and numeric questions, in her view, should be handled by query filters rather than vector similarity.

What users should know. Fox argues that citations are the visible sign of retrieval, and that the application, not the LLM, searches the web. Hanselman contrasts a Google AI answer that insisted it was 2024 with DuckDuckGo's summaries of the visible results. Fox ties this to transparency guidelines in a Microsoft design toolkit.

  • Embeddings place words close together when they appear in similar contexts. Fox, a principal cloud advocate for Python at Microsoft, pictures an "ice cream cone" of vectors in which dog and cat sit near each other because they fill the same slots in sentences. The thousands of dimensions carry no names; word2vec, which she trained herself on a Google News data set, is the kind of model that supports "king minus queen" vector arithmetic.
  • What an embedding model treats as similar reflects its builders' choices. With OpenAI's early text-embedding-ada-002, Fox found the nearest words to dog were cat and then God, with drug at sixth, which she infers came from character-level training; newer models fixed that. She also gets better multilingual results typing without accents, which she guesses reflects accents normalized in training. Hanselman frames such fixes as product-requirement decisions that build in bias.
  • Training data leaves smaller languages thinly represented. Model cards sometimes disclose the mix, and open weights do not mean known training data. Fox cites the Nomic multilingual embedding model: 234 million training pairs for English against 32,000 for Igbo and 16,000 for Yoruba, out of 1.6 billion in total, drawn from multilingual news.
  • RAG should use hybrid search and filters, not vectors alone. Documents are split into chunks of a few paragraphs, each stored with its embedding, page number and file name for citations. Fox always recommends combining vector and full-text search, because vector search always returns a closest result however far off. For numbers or "latest", she adds a pre-processing step that turns the query into a filter, such as the last year, before searching.
  • Citations mean RAG; LLMs themselves don't search the web. Fox says the key thing lay users should know is the difference between an answer from a model's weights, the most likely to be inaccurate, and one grounded in retrieved sources they can check. The LLM only suggests a query and synthesizes results, while application code does the searching. She cites transparency as a core design principle for AI systems.
Scott HanselmanAI Code Reviews with CodeRabbit's Howon Lee
synopsis

Lee, a senior software engineer at CodeRabbit, argues that an AI code reviewer earns its place through neutrality, context-building and verification rather than through the LLM itself, which, he insists, nobody yet understands.

Review as politics. Lee says much of CodeRabbit's business comes from teams whose reviews are entangled in feuds. A third-party bot that knows no one cools them, much like anonymous peer review.

More than a wrapper. Lee claims half of each LLM call is context the company assembles, beating a whole-codebase paste. Because code is checkable, a verification agent can catch hallucinations, and dozens of linters settle nitpicks.

What LLMs are. Lee says LLMs remain a "god of the gaps" mystery. He draws on the Chinese room, computational complexity and alchemy, and argues new words are needed for intelligence and truth.

Operating it. CodeRabbit picks models rather than offering a picker, ships new Anthropic models within 90 minutes of release and spends 5–10% of its effort curbing verbosity. Lee adds that about 40% of chats are users thanking the bot, which he defends.

  • An AI reviewer defuses office politics by not knowing anyone. Lee, a senior software engineer at CodeRabbit, says a sizeable share of the company's business (he puts it at 10 to 30%) comes from teams where personal feuds play out in code review. He likens the bot to anonymous academic peer review; customers, he says, report less politics, though CodeRabbit still wants humans reviewing.
  • CodeRabbit's value is the context it assembles, not the LLM. Lee says only about half of its LLM calls carry the code under review; the rest carry Jira and Linear tickets, a proprietary graph of the codebase and clustering to pick relevant context. He claims this beats pasting a whole codebase into Gemini, and estimates building that context by hand would take him about four hours per review.
  • Code can be checked, so hallucinations can be caught. CodeRabbit runs a verification agent to find and "stomp on" hallucinations, which Lee says works for code but not for political speech or philosophy. It also runs 40 auto-configured linters, with 50 more planned, to settle nitpick "holy wars" the way Go's formatter did.
  • CodeRabbit picks models itself rather than offering a picker. Lee says it tests new Anthropic models for weeks before release and has pushed them to production 90 minutes after launch, sharing internal evaluations with OpenAI and Anthropic. Users choose models only in on-premises enterprise installs. Taming model verbosity is 5–10% of the job, though he notes verbosity also seems to help on objective tasks like bug finding.
  • People thank the bot, and Lee thinks politeness is worthwhile. Of more than 20,000 daily chat conversations, he estimates from open-source ones that about 40% are people thanking it, costing tens of thousands. He argues politeness is an end in itself; Hanselman says he even apologizes to voice assistants so rudeness doesn't become a habit.
Crosstalk SolutionsEtherlighting in a Desktop Switch! Just What You Need!
  • The USW Pro XG 8 PoE is all-10 Gbps in desktop form. It has eight 10 Gbps RJ45 ports, all PoE+ with a 155 W PoE budget, two 10 Gbps SFP+ ports, layer 3 capability, internal fans and wall mounts for switch and brick. MSRP is $499, in stock in the US UniFi store as of recording.
  • Etherlighting colours each port by speed or by untagged VLAN. The host adopted it over a DAC from his UCG-Fiber (UniFi OS 4.2.12, Network 9.2.84) and showed default speed colours: yellow for fast Ethernet, white for both 1 and 10 Gbps, blue 2.5, orange 5. He re-coloured gigabit; breathing mode can be turned off.
  • The host rates $499 a good value against rivals. He found an FS switch at $589 with four SFP+ but 2.5 Gbps, layer 2 only RJ45, and a TP-Link at $442 with two SFP+ but likewise 2.5 Gbps layer 2; he could find no other brand matching the specs.
  • The 210 W external power brick is his main complaint. He accepts that building it in would force a rackmount chassis, and notes its own mounting bracket lets it hide under a desk. He also says UniFi's layer 3 differs from the standard implementation, without detail.
Dr. Jon Krohn895: The Future of Enterprise AI: Investor Shaun Johnson Reveals What Actually Works
synopsis

Shaun Johnson, a founding partner of the early-stage fund AIX Ventures, holds that AI's limit in the enterprise is now human behaviour change rather than capability. The fastest value, in his view, comes from AI that fills jobs companies are already trying to hire for. On the investing side, he argues that early-stage AI is a bet on teams that combine AI nativeness with commercial savvy and can pivot fast. He also argues that the scarcity of frontier talent shapes everything from salaries to acquisitions.

Why AIX is built this way. Johnson says AI is the inflection point where the next $50–100 billion companies will come from. He describes early stage as higher-return and less correlated with public markets than growth investing. Practitioners Richard Socher, Chris Manning and Anthony Goldbloom sit in every investment committee meeting beside full-time VCs, because founders build at the intersection of AI and a sector. The host adds Stanford AI Index figures: models 1/200th the size of Google's PaLM now reach about 60% on MMLU, and GPT-3.5-level capability costs up to 900x less per token. He wonders whether hype has entered a trough of disillusionment, and Johnson says that must be judged per application.

Judging founders. Early stage is "a game of people": teams that execute fast and pivot until the offering resonates with the market. Johnson rejects the host's three-founder model (CEO, CTO and AI researcher). He scores teams on AI nativeness and market savviness and de-risks the weaker side. In a consensus phase like the one after ChatGPT, extreme AI-native teams win, as with AI tutoring. As the technology commoditises, as SaaS stacks did, market insight matters more, until a successor to transformers resets things. He prefers production engineers who read papers over a dedicated research PhD.

Portfolio construction. Heat-seeking deals are known and expensive; truffle hunting finds non-consensus founders, where he says alpha usually lies. Crowded markets remain open, as Lovable's reported disruption of Cursor and Windsurf shows. Fund two, which the host says closed at $22 million, skips climate for lack of early-stage AI-climate deals. It focuses on enterprise applications and tech-bio. He says "your fund is made by your winners and your reputation by helping your non-winners."

Enterprise adoption. Johnson describes WorkHelix, which he discloses as an AIX investment, as a company that surfaces task profiles from enterprise data, maps bundles of tasks to generative-AI tools and A/B-tests the result. Behaviour change is the obstacle, he says, which explains rollups, professional-services revenue at AI startups, and CEOs mandating AI. The host argues tech hurdles no longer block adoption, citing cascades where cheaper LLMs defer to costlier ones, and expects enterprises to look similar in three to five years. Johnson expects a spread, citing a 5,000-person firm planning for 3,000 in two to three years. He warns that productivity gains with no revenue effect are hard to measure, and staff resist tools that threaten their jobs, so he would target unfilled job descriptions first.

Careers and talent. For practitioners, Johnson advises advocating for AI now and moving toward human-facing roles later, since robotics needs two or three more breakthroughs. Only single-digit thousands work at the frontier, he says, which drives compensation up and pushes big tech toward talent acquisitions. For investors these acquisitions are a downside hedge, as when one AIX team was bought by Google in about three days. He suggests a top-school AI PhD or a move into labs like FAIR or DeepMind as routes into that group.

  • Early-stage AI investing is a bet on AI-native, commercially savvy teams. Johnson, a founding partner of AIX Ventures, says practitioners Richard Socher and Chris Manning sit in every investment committee alongside full-time VCs. Teams are rated on AI nativeness and market savviness, and the weaker side is de-risked with advisors. He expects a shift from AI-native teams winning obvious "consensus" applications after ChatGPT to market-savvy teams with non-consensus insight. He argues builders who also read papers beat a dedicated research PhD on the team.
  • Portfolios need both heat-seeking and truffle-hunting bets. Johnson says hot deals the market already loves cost more, and a vintage's hot trends are rarely its best returners. Cheaper non-consensus bets are where big wins come from. He wouldn't steer founders away from crowded "red oceans", citing Lovable reportedly disrupting Cursor and Windsurf. AIX's second fund skipped climate because it found too few early-stage AI-climate deals and "atoms are more expensive than bits". The fund targets enterprise applications and tech-bio instead.
  • Behaviour change, not technology, is enterprise AI's bottleneck. Johnson says WorkHelix, an AIX portfolio company he discloses, maps an enterprise's tasks from raw data to generative-AI solutions and proves gains in A/B tests. He reads investor rollups of service businesses, and professional-services line items at AI startups, as responses to that friction; one CEO told him they had to mandate AI every Friday. His fastest route to value is to fill open job requisitions rather than make current staff more productive, since teams resist tools that lead to a reduction in force.
  • Enterprise change will be gradual and uneven. The host forecasts superhuman ability on narrow tasks within three to five years, but enterprises largely unchanged because of human friction. Johnson expects a spread: one 5,000-person company told him it would be 3,000 in two to three years, as AI takes over the 30–40% of engineering doing patches. The host reports, at the time of recording, about 6,000 Microsoft layoffs, mostly software engineers. Johnson's career advice is to advocate for AI now, and longer term to move toward human-to-human roles, since humanoid robots are two or three research breakthroughs away.
  • Scarce frontier talent drives acqui-hires, which also protect investors. Johnson puts frontier AI practitioners at "single-digit thousands", so compensation is skyrocketing. He sees talent acquisitions as the opportunity cost founders must outrun, and as downside protection for investors; one AIX team went from operating to acquired by Google in about three days. Routes into that group, he says, are moving from engineering into labs like FAIR or DeepMind, or a PhD at schools such as CMU, Berkeley, Stanford, NYU, MIT or Toronto.
Dr. Jon KrohnAvery Smith on the #1 Mistake in Data Portfolios (And How to Fix It)
  • Overused practice datasets count against a portfolio. Asked by a listener what employers hold against newcomers, Smith names the Titanic, Iris and MNIST datasets. For analysts he adds Google's bike-share "capstone", each done by "probably literally millions of people". A project a few hundred people have done is fine. MNIST digit classification alone won't land a computer-vision job.
  • A bare GitHub profile is not a portfolio. Smith admits the claim is deliberately provocative. He argues GitHub is a code repository, messy by default, and that recruiters give a portfolio 10 seconds before granting 60. A sparse or fork-filled profile wastes those seconds. He now thinks even his GitHub Pages site was overkill and suggests a simple builder such as Squarespace or Carrd.
Dr. Jon KrohnThe 2 Portfolio Projects Every Aspiring Data Analyst Should Build (with Avery Smith)
  • Choose projects you care about, or they won't get finished. Smith says side projects die for lack of motivation, so they should tie to a hobby or a target employer. One killer project aimed at a company like Meta could be enough on its own.
  • One SQL project and one data-viz project are enough to start. Smith calls waiting for five projects before applying a trap: "progress over perfection". More projects only help if they don't eat too much time.
  • Personal-data projects motivate but can be costly to collect. His 2021 bootcamp built lessons around personal portfolio projects, such as a Looker Studio dashboard of phone screen time and Python on the Spotify API. He notes that Apple won't export screen time, while downloading a CSV into Tableau is far faster.
  • An analytical mindset in a non-data job makes résumé material. A former student who was a delivery driver A/B-tested the texts she sent to get into gated buildings. Smith says that became a résumé line ("A/B testing marketing messages") that made her LinkedIn read like an analyst's.
Dr. Jon Krohn“Resumes Talk, Projects Walk”: Avery Smith’s #1 Career Tip
  • A project makes a résumé keyword tangible and flips the interview. The host argues a working demo tied to a real passion matters far more than claiming PyTorch, and says he doesn't see how such a candidate could miss an entry-level job. Smith adds that a project supplied before or during an interview replaces "mystery questions" with questions about your own work.
  • Public project work can bypass the interview entirely. Smith says he applied three or four times for a Utah Jazz internship without success. With about 60,000 LinkedIn followers, he then posted a project scraping and visualising the team's season shot data and tagged its analytics staff. He says he got the internship with no interview.
Technology and FriendsLaurent Bugnion on Coordinating Hands on Labs [EPISODE 854]
  • The conference's hands-on labs drew heavy repeat attendance. At Build, Bugnion, in Microsoft developer relations, was technical co-lead of the in-person labs workstream. There were 48 unique 75-minute labs on provided devices, each led by one or two speakers with proctors. Each ran twice and the most popular ran a third time: 99 sessions over three and a half days. More than 4,000 lab seats were filled, and the average lab attendee did three labs. He says 75 minutes is long enough to go deep without crowding out the rest of the conference.
  • Labs offer access to product experts that home learning cannot. Labs are tied to breakout sessions and keynote announcements so attendees can code on just-released technology. Bugnion says some labs are offered on demand afterward. Being there adds product-group engineers and expert proctors to answer questions.
  • Months of preparation and selective vetting come before the labs. Bugnion puts it at three to four months: serious work starts around February for a May conference. Room and budget set the lab count, and an internal call for content drew about 100 proposals. Technical experts, including James Montemagno and Scott Hanselman, helped pick about half. Labs run on a vendor's virtualization platform, Microsoft buys its own Azure subscriptions and licenses, and MVPs help test. Bugnion says few labs had technical problems and credits the testing and Microsoft's near-weekly release cadence, which means labs build on stable products.
  • MCP and agent labs were the most popular. A lab on using MCP with function apps was the only one with MCP in its title and got an extra session added on the fly after turning many people away. Bugnion says agent labs generally were in demand, including Copilot Studio labs taken by non-technical coworkers. He notes the product UI changed on the conference's first day, forcing a scramble.
  • The next fix is matching attendees to the right lab level. These are ideas only, nothing implemented. Bugnion says the session catalog conveys too little for people to choose well, and some Ignite lab attendees had no GitHub account. He floats shorter, less technical labs (what GitHub is, how to commit and open a pull request) and scenario-driven content over product tours, which he expects to be the trend. Work is already under way on Ignite in San Francisco in November and the AI Tour.
Dr. Jon Krohn894: In Case You Missed It in May 2025 — with Jon Krohn (@JonKrohnLearns)
synopsis

The host's May 2025 recap replays four interview clips. Taken together they argue that AI's enterprise value now depends on fitting tools to specific problems: agents for narrow skills, faster dataframes for real pipelines, VR for training that is scarce or dangerous, and clean data under conversational analytics.

Agents versus RAG. Dell's John Roese says enterprises differ by proprietary data and unique skills. RAG chatbots, behind nearly all of Dell's production projects, unlock the data; agents digitise narrow skills and act autonomously under human supervision. He says this needs a different architecture, with a knowledge graph, memory and tool use.

Polars in production. The authors of Python Polars: The Definitive Guide recount moving Alliander's pipeline off a single 700 GB-RAM machine. One job shrank from about 500 GB to 40 GB, and writing the book while using Polars surfaced gaps they reported upstream.

VR education. Mary Spio says SEEK lets one instructor teach at scale. She says it serves needs like training a million prospective pilots for electric aircraft, CPR for new mothers and intubation practice that hospitals now do on paid people.

Conversations with data. Adverity's Martin Brunthaler places success in data quality, harmonisation and monitoring. He describes a staged pipeline from question classification to validated SQL, and plans to use different models for different steps.

  • Agents digitise skills, where RAG chatbots unlock proprietary data. In a clip from episode 887, Dell's global CTO and chief AI officer John Roese names an enterprise's two sources of differentiation: proprietary data and unique skills. He says almost all of Dell's production generative-AI projects tackle the first, via RAG. Agents tackle the second by taking an objective and acting autonomously, with the human "on the loop" rather than in it. He frames them as narrow, geofenced skills like driverless airport trains, far from AGI.
  • Polars proved itself through a small benchmarked rewrite. In episode 885, the co-authors of the O'Reilly book Python Polars: The Definitive Guide describe moving a pipeline off pandas and R at Dutch grid operator Alliander. The pipeline ran on a single AWS instance with over 700 GB of RAM. A benchmarked rewrite of one small piece won over a sceptical team, and one job shrank from about 500 GB to 40 GB. They say production use exposed gaps they fed back as issues, such as weighted random sampling.
  • VR training can scale scarce teachers and risky practice. In episode 889, SEEK founder Mary Spio says one instructor can teach at scale in VR, against a global teacher shortage she cites as 4.6 million. She says an electric-aircraft client needs about 100,000 pilots soon, so a million must be trained. She adds that the brain forms memories in VR as if the experience were real. Her CPR training for new mothers and Baptist Health's nursing residency aim to build the confidence nurses lack, since the average nurse is 50.
  • Conversational analytics depends on harmonised, monitored data. In episode 891, Adverity's Martin Brunthaler says data must be complete and aligned across sources, with consistent types and UTC timestamps. It also needs quality monitors, anomaly detection, a retained raw layer and a data dictionary with lineage. His pipeline classifies the question, prompts a model with context, generates and validates SQL, runs it and summarises. A benchmark team tests responses against expected answers, and he says models are converging, so differentiation lies in how components are composed.
Crosstalk SolutionsIt's Annoying when Hotels Don't Give you Ethernet.
  • The hotel room's access-point Ethernet ports gave no connection. The host plugged his GL.iNet Slate 7 into both ports on an in-room Aruba wall access point and never got a DHCP address; unsure whether it was misconfigured or blocked, he fell back to Wi-Fi as WAN, though he prefers hardwired.
Dr. Jon KrohnWant to Break into a Data Career? Use Avery Smith's "ETSP" Ladder
  • Learn data tools in order of demand and ease. Smith's "Every Turtle Swims Past" ladder (Excel, Tableau, SQL, Python) ranks tools on how in demand and how easy they are. Excel is familiar and Tableau is drag-and-drop. SQL is "probably the most in demand" and easier than Python, which comes last for its steep learning curve.
  • Getting hired fast beats learning everything first. Smith's philosophy is to get a foot in the door as soon as possible. The field changes constantly, and on-the-job learning is the most relevant and is paid.
  • AI speeds coding but doesn't remove the need to program. Smith says AI gets him 60–70% of the way on code, but without programming knowledge you can't see where it is wrong. He sees it as a tool for professionals, not a replacement. The host uses Claude for most daily work and pays $200 a month for OpenAI's deep research, which he says saves him thousands of dollars of time.
Crosstalk SolutionsWhat you Need to Know about the Demise of a Telephony Giant!
  • Mitel has spent a decade failing to move to the cloud. The host recounts its 2017 ShoreTel purchase, going private a year later, a 2021 cloud sale and RingCentral UCaaS partnership, a Chapter 11 filing early last year citing over $1.15 billion of debt, then dropping RingCentral after three years for Zoom.
  • MiVoice Office 250 loses all support in June 2026. It is already end of life; MiVoice Business is still supported, but the host argues that could change at any time. His reading is that Mitel is in survival mode with no clear long-term strategy, a risk for customers who buy phone systems for 5–10 years.
  • The host's remedy is moving to Crosstalk's own VoIP service. He openly pitches it as an alternative to RingCentral or Zoom: month-to-month, no termination fees, no per-user licensing, on-premises or hosted, project-managed porting. Mitel, RingCentral or Zoom customers who mention the video get 10% off Crosstalk hardware through 2025.
Dr. Jon KrohnHow Avery Smith Escaped a Dangerous Lab Job for a Career in Data
  • A dangerous, low-paid lab job drove him into data. As a chemical lab technician, Smith got hydrofluoric acid on an ungloved hand and washed it off in time. He decided he wouldn't risk his life for near-minimum wage, and wanted the job of the company's data scientist instead.
  • An internal pivot is the best route for career changers. Smith moved into a junior analyst role at the same employer, at 25%, then 50%, then 100% of his time. He argues a known, trusted employee is less of a risk than an outside hire without data experience. He credits the firm's size, under 15 people, and doubts it would have worked at ExxonMobil, where he later worked.
Dr. Jon Krohn893: How to Jumpstart Your Data Career (by Applying Like a Scientist) — with Avery Smith
synopsis

Avery Smith, a former chemical lab technician who now trains career changers through his Data Career Jumpstart bootcamp and Data Career Podcast, argues that the quickest way into data is to get a foot in the door rather than master everything first. He would learn the easiest in-demand tools, show them in a portfolio built on real interests, network as hard as you study, and treat the job hunt itself as a data problem. He reckons someone studying two hours a day can be skill-ready in about twelve weeks.

Mindset. Smith says the person most likely to reject a candidate is the candidate. A student of his with no technical degree got hired partly by framing earlier work as data work. Since data is too vast and fast-moving to master, he tells people to apply once they meet roughly half the requirements. The host adds research he has read that some groups, women for example, are less likely to apply without meeting every criterion.

His own pivot. A hydrofluoric-acid splash on an ungloved hand, at minimum wage, convinced Smith to leave the lab. His small employer (under 15 people) had a data scientist with a window office, and it let Smith move into a junior analyst role at 25%, then 50%, then 100% of his time. He calls an internal pivot the best option for career changers because the employer already knows and trusts them, though he doubts it would have worked at ExxonMobil, where he later worked. He describes his motivation as an anti-goal: escaping where he was. He notes that a working life runs 80,000 to 90,000 hours.

The learning ladder. "Every Turtle Swims Past" means Excel, Tableau, SQL, Python, ranked by demand against ease. Excel is familiar, Tableau is drag-and-drop, SQL is the most in demand and easier than Python, and Python comes last. The host says he seldom writes code character by character; Smith says AI gets him 60–70% of the way, but you need to program to catch its errors. The host uses Claude day to day and pays $200 a month for OpenAI's deep research.

Skills, portfolio, network. Smith weights his SPN method equally, and says networking may matter more than skills because "humans hire humans" from a thousand applicants. The host says nearly all his own opportunities came from meeting people in person. Under "resumes talk, projects walk", Smith says a project turns an interview into questions about your own work. After three or four rejections he won a Utah Jazz internship with no interview by posting a project analysing their shot data on LinkedIn. His minimum for analysts is one SQL and one data-viz project, chosen for interest so it gets finished. Personal projects are motivating, he says, but their data can be hard to collect, as with phone screen time. Even a delivery driver A/B-testing gate-access texts earned a strong résumé line. He would avoid Titanic, Iris, MNIST and Google's bike-share capstone. A GitHub profile, he argues, is a poor portfolio unless curated, since recruiters give it 10 seconds before granting 60.

Applying like a scientist. Smith has students apply from week four to six, and says many are hired within 100 days. About 15% of data jobs he analysed were fully remote, far fewer than the share of people who want remote work, so remote searches take longer. He borrows A/B-testing of résumés from a past guest and requires a job tracker. When he posted a dummy analyst job on LinkedIn saying "do not apply", it drew hundreds of applicants within 24 hours, and he found its candidate ranking made no sense. The host agrees that LinkedIn applications mostly vanish into a black hole.

  • Career changers reject themselves before employers do. Smith says "the number one hiring manager that rejects you from jobs is yourself". Data is everywhere, so past roles can be framed as data experience; at around 50% of a job's requirements, he says, "just apply". The host adds research he has read that women are less likely than men to apply without meeting every criterion.
  • An internal pivot is the lowest-risk route into data. After a near-miss with hydrofluoric acid as a lab technician, Smith moved into a junior analyst role at the same company, at 25%, then 50%, then 100% of his time. He says employers who already know and trust you see less risk. He credits the firm's size, under 15 people, and doubts it would have worked at ExxonMobil, where he later worked.
  • Learn data tools in order of demand and ease. His "Every Turtle Swims Past" ladder (Excel, Tableau, SQL, Python) starts with what is in demand and easy. SQL is "probably the most in demand", and Python comes last for its steep learning curve. The aim is to get hired fast, since on-the-job learning is best. He says AI gets him 60–70% of the way on code, but you must know programming to see where it is wrong.
  • Portfolio and network weigh as much as skills. Smith rates skills, portfolio and network as equal thirds, and has considered reversing the order. His line is "resumes talk, projects walk". After three or four rejections, he won a Utah Jazz internship with no interview by tagging the analytics staff on LinkedIn in a project scraping their shot data. For analysts, one SQL project and one data-viz project on a real interest is a start. He would avoid overused datasets (Titanic, Iris, MNIST, Google's bike-share capstone), and argues a bare GitHub is no portfolio when recruiters give it 10 seconds.
  • Run the job hunt like an experiment. At about 14 hours a week Smith says a learner can be fully skill-ready in roughly 12 weeks, applying from week four to six; many of his students are hired in under 100 days. His analysis found about 15% of data jobs fully remote, against far more who want one. He has students A/B test résumés and keep a job tracker; one tracker showed 75% of applications going through LinkedIn Jobs, so he told her to switch platforms.
Dr. Jon KrohnThe 4 Biggest Mistakes Startup Founders Make (with Martin Brunthaler)
  • Build instead of overthinking architecture. Brunthaler, a serial entrepreneur and Adverity's CTO, says his teams have fallen victim to overthinking. AI coding tools now make it quick to get something running, though he says he is not endorsing vibe coding.
  • Use proven "boring" tech and keep talking to customers. He would compose an exciting use case from technology that works. He calls customer feedback the most critical input, and says Adverity has been customer-centric from the start.
Dr. Jon KrohnWhat Data Work Will Look Like in 5 Years, According to Adverity’s CTO, Martin Brunthaler
  • Data work will shift from mechanics to strategy. Brunthaler expects many workflows that still need manual steps to be fully automated. People would then focus on the business outcome and the "why" of data rather than the "how". He hedges that five years is a very long horizon in a field where he thinks in half-years.
  • Separating compute from storage will reshape the data stack. He describes raw data held in standardised object storage, with the industry settling on Iceberg as the format. Different query engines, and likely generative AI, would connect to it depending on purpose, letting businesses pick the right engine for each case.
Technology and FriendsTommy Falgout on Bad AI in a Box [EPISODE 853]
  • Bad AI in a Box inverts AI to make it approachable. Falgout's portable black box, which he demoed on stage at Microsoft Build, offers bad advice, fake facts, cocktails, conspiracies and insults (Monty Python, Shakespeare, French, German, Spanish) via a knob-and-button menu on a 20x4 display. A Python script on a single-core Raspberry Pi Zero W, chosen because larger Pis draw too much power, sends a prompt to Azure OpenAI and prints the answer on a thermal printer, all in a 3D-printed case.
  • A box that stalls loses its audience, so it never waits. Falgout says people lose interest if nothing happens within about 5 seconds. The box tethers to his phone for connectivity, and an offline mode prints a pre-canned response if the cloud takes more than two or three seconds or returns nothing.
  • Asking for bad advice runs straight into responsible-AI guardrails. Falgout found Azure's content filtering withholding some responses because he was asking for harmful output, so he worked with content colleagues, added a disclaimer to the printout at the suggestion of in-house OpenAI specialists, and screens risky outputs himself, such as fake facts about Microsoft and Satya Nadella at Build. He does no grounding, since there is no truth to hit; instead he shapes output through the system prompt (for example, a bartender asked to make a really bad drink) and changes the prompts for each conference.
  • A fortune-printer hobby kit gave the idea its hook. Falgout's first version, built after an internal OpenAI hackathon, was a bad-advice website that "didn't really catch on"; adapting an Adafruit project that printed pre-canned fortunes on a thermal printer is what drew people in, first on the KubeCon vendor floor about a year and a half before recording. The code, 3D-printing files and a bill of materials are open source on GitHub, and he invites forks; the Adafruit kit is discontinued, so he sourced the printer from China, and two boxes now exist.
  • Making it wireless was the hardest part, and it was hardware. The thermal printer draws a large current spike, so powering it through the Pi rebooted the Pi, while lowering the draw left prints too faint because the printer burns the paper. Falgout went through about five batteries before finding one with two separate USB ports, one each for printer and Pi, and says the tight form factor, including a vertically mounted battery held with Velcro for air travel, changed how he thinks about physical design.
Dr. Jon KrohnIs Agentic AI Just Hype? Adverity CTO Martin Brunthaler's Take on the Trend
  • "Agentic AI" has been stretched to cover things it isn't. Brunthaler says the term, like "AI" before it, is applied to statistical and machine-learning features with no generative model in them; his working definition is a ChatGPT-style model given access to functions so it can act, or retrieve information, on the user's behalf. The host revises his own broader usage and proposes "an LLM that can take actions", which Brunthaler accepts, adding that a definition that is too broad sets expectations systems cannot meet.
  • Users don't yet trust AI to decide fully on their behalf. Brunthaler holds that some level of control and monitoring has to be built in, even where an agent can call an API, use the result or trigger an action without user interaction.
  • The industry is now in a standards-setting phase for agents. Brunthaler points to the recent hype around MCP and expects more around A2A, and says Adverity, like many SaaS products, will offer MCP so a company's agent of choice (Gemini, OpenAI or another) can hook into it. He describes the integration as early, currently needing Claude Desktop, with use cases such as listing a customer's connected data sources, checking they are properly connected and creating re-authorisation links.
Dr. Jon Krohn892: We’re In The AI “Trough of Disillusionment” (and that’s Great!) — with @JonKrohnLearns
  • Enterprise generative AI has entered the "trough of disillusionment". Using Gartner's hype-cycle term, the host cites S&P Global survey results that 42% of companies are abandoning most of their generative AI projects, up from 17% a year earlier, and reports that Klarna admitted it went too far replacing customer-service staff with AI and is rehiring humans; Gartner analysts, he says, expect the trough to last until the end of the year.
  • Consumer adoption is booming even as business adoption stalls. The host relays Sam Altman's figure of 800 million weekly ChatGPT users, double the February level, against corporate obstacles he lists: data trapped in silos and legacy IT, a shortage of technical talent, and brand and privacy risk from bots that make damaging mistakes.
  • Hyperscaler AI spending is outrunning visible business returns. He cites Pierre Ferragu of New Street Research that the combined capex of Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft and Meta is on track for 28% of revenues this year, against 12% a decade ago. He notes that Nadella and Pichai showcased token counts rather than sales or profit from AI, and that most AI cloud revenue comes from labs and startups the same giants fund, which he calls a circular economy.
  • The hyperscalers' internal AI uses are where returns are showing. He lists Google's AI search summaries reaching over 1.5 billion people monthly, Meta's Llama-based ad tools, Microsoft's workplace apps and GitHub Copilot, and Amazon's recommendations and logistics, and links Microsoft's recent 6,000 layoffs, reportedly many software engineers, to AI coding tools. He presents Apple's postponed LLM rebuild of Siri as the cost of moving too slowly.
  • The bottleneck is applying existing capability, not building smarter models. The host calls this a "capability overhang" and, citing Microsoft CTO Kevin Scott, says agents still need better memory and protocols such as MCP. His own conclusion is that the trough is an opportunity: the slope of enlightenment follows, and practitioners who keep solving integration, talent and risk problems will come out strongest.
Scott HanselmanAzure AI Foundry (from BUILD 2025) with Yina Arenas
synopsis

This is a Microsoft Build 2025 session, co-presented by Hanselman and Yina Arenas, who leads product for Azure AI, and rebroadcast as a Hanselminutes episode. Both presenters are Microsoft employees showing Microsoft products. The session ends with a working "podcast factory": a recording dropped into a folder comes out as a transcript, VTT captions, topics and link-checked show notes. Hanselman keeps the final edit as the human in the loop, and he hopes the factory turns two to three hours of weekly toil into 10 to 15 minutes.

The problem. Hanselman frames the show, now at episode 997 after more than 20 years and made with one paid editor, as his own work. He wants AI only for the toil, meaning show notes, guest bios, links and scheduling. He wants to stay in control rather than paste the show into a cloud chatbot. The first step was transcribing roughly 1,000 back episodes with Whisper.

Models. Arenas describes a catalogue of over 10,000 models through Hugging Face, with benchmark leaderboards for quality, safety, cost and throughput. The Build announcement is a model router that sends simple questions to nano models and hard ones to reasoning models. She claims it runs up to 60% cheaper than GPT-4.1 for a one-to-two-point accuracy loss. Hanselman argues for a distilled show-notes model over a general one on cost and power grounds. Arenas puts the next 1,000 episodes at about $150 on the custom model, though the captioned cost figures are muddled. Foundry Local runs Phi-4 mini on his laptop GPU. A misspelling of Arenas's name produced a confident biography of someone else.

Agents. Arenas advises building small agents that can each be tested, then orchestrating them. The two patterns are connected agents and human-in-the-loop workflows. Microsoft announced the Foundry Agent Service as generally available, with enterprise storage, networking and authentication, plus A2A, MCP and OpenAPI interoperability. The demos show four pieces: the fine-tuned show-notes agent, a voice orchestrator, agentic retrieval in Azure AI Search, and Content Understanding for transcripts. Agentic retrieval split a question about recurring themes into subqueries. Content Understanding identified Hanselman's ad-read voice as a second speaker. The agents are wired together with Semantic Kernel, which Microsoft says it is merging with AutoGen. Hanselman's point is that existing Logic Apps and Functions become tools rather than being replaced.

Observability and governance. Traces go through OpenTelemetry into Azure Monitor, with evaluations for relevance, intent resolution, task adherence and indirect jailbreak. The evaluations can run in CI as a GitHub Action. Agents get Entra identities and Purview and Defender coverage. Arenas also showed a fine-tuning run that failed.

The result. The live pipeline produced the notes, but its link verifier flagged two links and the YouTube link was missing. Hanselman would fix those before handing the episode to his editor. Ideas left undone include guest sourcing, scheduling, social copy and translation. Arenas closed with customer counts of over 70,000 on Foundry and over 10,000 on the agent service.

  • Foundry was demonstrated on Hanselman's own podcast workflow. The episode is a Microsoft Build 2025 session Hanselman co-presented with Arenas, who leads product for Azure AI, rebroadcast as a Hanselminutes episode. The target was the show-notes, bio, link and transcript toil on a show now at episode 997, which he puts at two to three hours a week and hopes to cut to 10 to 15, with himself as the human in the loop.
  • Small, fine-tuned, routed models are argued to beat one giant model. Arenas said a model router announced at Build, which picks a nano, mini or reasoning model per query, runs up to 60% cheaper than GPT-4.1 for a one-to-two-point accuracy hit. Hanselman called sending every MP3 to a large chatbot "a sledgehammer to a scalpel fight" and used a fine-tuned GPT-4.1 nano for show notes; Arenas put the next 1,000 episodes at about $150 on the custom model.
  • Local models are cheap but still hallucinate without good input. Foundry Local ran Phi-4 mini on his laptop's RTX 4060, summarizing web results gathered via Perplexity. When he misspelled Arenas's name it confidently produced the biography of someone else, which both presenters used as the case for grounding and evaluation.
  • Agents should be small, testable and orchestrated, not monolithic. Arenas recommended single-task agents validated like unit tests, combined as connected agents or as a human-in-the-loop workflow; Microsoft announced the Foundry Agent Service as GA, with A2A and MCP support. The show-notes, link-verifier, bio and transcript agents were wired together with Semantic Kernel, which Microsoft is converging with AutoGen, and in the live run the verifier flagged two bad links and the YouTube link came out missing.
  • Observability and identity are presented as production prerequisites. Tracing goes through OpenTelemetry into Azure Monitor, evaluations such as task adherence and indirect jailbreak run as a GitHub Action, and each agent gets its own Entra identity. Arenas claimed over 70,000 Foundry customers and over 10,000 on the agent service.
Dr. Jon KrohnHow Adverity’s AI Transforms Data Access for Everyone (with Martin Brunthaler)
  • Natural-language queries replace hunting for the right dashboard. Brunthaler says Adverity's Data Conversations lets a user ask a question instead of finding a dashboard or asking another team for data, and returns a table that can go straight into a Google Sheet or be materialised as a Snowflake or BigQuery table. He says the company's marketing subject-matter expertise is built in, so a question like "best performing campaigns" gets connected to the right data.
  • Conversation allows exploration that BI drill-downs cannot. Brunthaler argues that branching into other data sets to understand why a trend is happening is possible in a conversation but not with an explore function in Looker or in Adverity's own earlier tooling.
  • Enterprises need a tool they can manage, own and audit. Brunthaler presents governance as a core requirement: a single governed tool rather than a mix of connected SaaS tools that cannot meet current regulatory demands.
  • Conversational data tools shift analysts' work rather than removing it. Brunthaler says they free analysts and data engineers from ad hoc data-pull requests to focus on strategic work, and that the role will move toward governing these tools and checking their answers are correct. He sees no jobs at risk, only changing profiles.
Scott HanselmanEPISODE 17 - Scott & Mark Learn To… Induced Hallucinations
  • Induced hallucination is a different thing from a jailbreak. Hanselman asked Mark Russinovich to get ChatGPT to confirm an invented story that Russinovich had killed a man in Prague. Russinovich said that was inducing hallucination, not jailbreaking, and the model held to "no such incident" despite repeated insistence.
  • Asked for Hanselman's laws, ChatGPT invented a canonical list. Prompted for "Hanselman's 10 laws", it turned real blog-post titles and sayings of Hanselman's into "commonly cited" laws he never wrote. With search grounding it still made up about half of them, including a fabricated quote about a "violent psychopath" maintainer. Pushed further, it misattributed an invented quote to Russinovich, and retries gave very different answers, which both took as proof it is "not a fact machine."
  • Other models failed differently. Gemini, a reasoning model, leaked a stretch of its internal thinking into the reply. Claude handled Hanselman well but credited Russinovich with "10 immutable laws", which Russinovich read as a conflation with the 10 Immutable Laws of Security that a Microsoft employee wrote in the early 2000s.
  • Labs are training models to say "I don't know." Russinovich relayed Andrej Karpathy's explanation: probe the model, and where it answers wrongly, train it on "I don't know" so it generalizes when its knowledge signal is weak. He said this cuts hallucination sharply but not to zero. He also described groundedness detection in Azure AI Foundry, where a second model checks the answer against the retrieved prompt, and agreed with Hanselman that it works like a firewall: better, but no guarantee.
  • Use AI for brainstorming, and distrust what it states as fact. Russinovich cited a recent BBC study finding a large share of AI references to BBC articles were wrong, recalling the figure as roughly 60%. Hanselman suggested models need an explicit grounded-versus-creative mode alongside temperature.
Dr. Jon KrohnNow You Can Talk in Natural Language With Your Data (with Martin Brunthaler)
  • Conversational data access depends first on underlying data quality. Brunthaler says the data set must be complete and harmonised across sources, with aligned data types and formats (all timestamps in UTC, for example), alerts when something goes wrong, and problematic data kept out of production. Adverity's platform, he says, has marketing-specific monitors such as campaign naming-convention checks, plus anomaly detection.
  • Keep a raw layer so transformations can be redone. Brunthaler describes a multi-layer approach in which the raw data set is always retained as the starting point for revising transformations, with AI assistance in composing them. He adds that data dictionaries, descriptions and lineage are critical for the conversational interface to answer correctly.
  • Response quality is benchmarked continuously against expected answers. Brunthaler says a dedicated team tests against a predefined set of expected responses while features ship roughly weekly. Adverity is currently committed to one model but plans separate models for SQL compilation, pre-flight qualification of a question, and the conversation itself.
  • Models are converging, so the advantage is in assembly. Brunthaler says there is no trade secret in the LLMs, whose leaderboards change every other month, and describes the pipeline as plain: classify the question, pick a model, supply a system prompt and model metadata, generate SQL, validate and run it, then analyse the result into an answer. The payoff he claims is a near-real-time table in place of a ticket that used to take two weeks.
Dr. Jon Krohn891: Conversational AI is Overhauling Data Analytics — with Martin Brunthaler
synopsis

Martin Brunthaler, co-founder and CTO of the marketing data platform Adverity, argues that natural-language conversation is the next stage of data democratisation after dashboards failed at it, but only on a governed, harmonised data foundation. He ends up holding that the edge lies in assembly, not in converging models, and that analysts' work will shift from data mechanics to strategy.

From TV-ad reporting to integration. Adverity grew from the founders' struggle to get TV-commercial metrics, which arrived as a CSV turned into a PowerPoint six weeks after airing. Incorporated in 2015, it began as verticalised BI for agency reporting and grew into data integration, now its core, across ad, measurement, finance, CRM and shop systems. Brunthaler says the platform could serve other verticals, but its connectors and consultants are biased toward marketing.

Why dashboards fall short. In his account dashboards are built once, not reviewed, not trusted, and give no way to dig further, so users return to source systems. Data Conversations, about to launch at recording, answers plain-language questions, grounded by a data dictionary linking each attribute to its source and meaning.

What has to be right first. His prerequisites are complete, harmonised data with aligned types and formats such as UTC timestamps, marketing-specific monitors like campaign naming conventions, anomaly detection, and a retained raw layer so transformations can be revised. A dedicated team benchmarks answers against a predefined set of expected responses while features ship weekly. Adverity uses one model now and plans separate ones for SQL generation, pre-flight qualification and conversation. He says the pipeline holds no secret: classify the question, prompt with metadata, generate and validate SQL, run it, analyse the result. A two-week data-access ticket becomes a near-real-time table.

Replacing the modular stack. Against the usual chain of BigQuery or Snowflake, dbt and Power BI, Looker or Tableau, Brunthaler says Adverity delivers BI-ready data, can run dbt for customers, shares data over OData, and absorbs the constant source changes that make generic ETL tedious. Building that stack in-house, he argues, is effort better spent on business value.

Jobs, agents and standards. He sees no jobs at risk: analysts lose ad hoc data-pull requests and move toward governing the tools and checking their answers. He objects that "agentic AI" is stretched to cover non-generative features, accepts the host's "an LLM that can take actions", and says full trust in autonomous decisions has not arrived. Adverity will offer MCP, which at recording needs Claude Desktop, for tasks like checking connected sources and generating re-authorisation links.

The five-year view. He forecasts automated manual workflows and separated compute and storage, with raw data in object storage in the Iceberg format so query engines are chosen by purpose, while hedging that his own horizon is about six months. His founder advice: don't overthink, use boring proven technology with AI coding help short of vibe coding, and keep listening to customers.

  • Dashboards have failed at democratising data; conversation is the next step. Brunthaler, Adverity's co-founder and CTO, says dashboards are built once, rarely reviewed, mistrusted, and give no way to ask follow-up questions, so users end up back in the source systems. He says Adverity's Data Conversations, launching at recording, answers natural-language questions with an actionable table and allows branching into other data sets in a way a Looker-style explore function cannot.
  • A conversational layer only works on a governed, high-quality data foundation. Brunthaler lists the prerequisites: complete, harmonised data with aligned types and formats (UTC timestamps), marketing-specific monitors such as campaign naming conventions, anomaly detection, and a retained raw layer so transformations can be redone. He says Adverity's data dictionary, linking each attribute to its source and meaning, is what grounds the model's answers.
  • LLMs are converging, so the edge lies in assembly and testing. Brunthaler says there is no trade secret in the models, whose leaderboards turn over every other month; the pipeline classifies a question, picks a model, adds a system prompt and metadata, generates and validates SQL, runs it and analyses the result. A dedicated team benchmarks responses against a predefined expected set, and Adverity plans to move from one model to separate models per stage.
  • Rebuilding a modular "modern data stack" is wasted engineering effort. Brunthaler argues Adverity replaces a typical BigQuery or Snowflake, dbt and Power BI/Looker/Tableau chain by delivering harmonised marketing data ready for BI, running dbt for customers and keeping up with frequent changes at sources such as Google and Facebook. He calls agentic AI an overused term, defines it with the host as "an LLM that can take actions", and says Adverity will offer MCP.
  • Within five years, work shifts from data mechanics to strategy. Brunthaler forecasts that manual workflows will be automated and that separating compute from storage, with raw data in object storage in the Iceberg format the industry has settled on, will let businesses pick query engines, and eventually generative AI, by purpose. He hedges that five years is long when his own horizon is about half a year. His founder advice: don't overthink, use boring proven tech with AI coding tools (not vibe coding), and keep talking to customers.
Dr. Jon KrohnThe 3 Traits of Great Tech Innovators (with Mary Spio)
  • Live out of your imagination, not your circumstances. Spio, summing up her book It's Not Rocket Science: Seven Gamechanging Traits for Uncommon Success, points to dreaming of walking on the moon while growing up in Ghana at a terrible time. Her advice is to start before conditions are perfect, since things fall into place once the journey begins.
  • When investors judge the founder, not the business, change venue. Spio recounts Silicon Valley investors remarking that she didn't look like an engineer, one handing her a book on how engineers dress, and VCs saying they had no fund for people of colour or no diversity fund yet. Quoting the line that sometimes you need a change of perspective, not patience, she says her first big investor came in New York, from backers focused on her revenue. The host's research says she bootstrapped CEEK on credit cards through enterprise sales cycles of a year or more.
  • Go where you are valued. Spio says a satellite employer (Intelsat, then PanAmSat) where her boss was unfriendly lost her content-distribution work when Boeing recruited her; she sold her patents to Boeing, the technology grossed it billions and was sold for a billion, and her former department was later laid off, with the old boss asking her for a position.
Dr. Jon KrohnThe Risks of AI-Curated Realities (with Mary Spio)
  • AI will tailor immersive experiences, even narratives, to each person. Spio, who the host says holds over 10 patents across AI, digital cinema, spatial audio and extended reality and invented the first 360-degree 4D audio headphones, says this customisation is already possible and extends to education, matching different learning styles. She calls current capabilities the tip of the iceberg.
  • Personalised VR makes manipulation a real risk, the host argues. He puts it to Spio that bespoke, emotionally targeted content in VR, where the brain cannot tell it from reality, could be used to shift people's political preferences on top of today's deepfakes.
  • Displaced workers will move into curating and validating AI content. Spio quotes Elon Musk that mass unemployment from automation is a certainty and a figure she attributes, uncertainly, to the IMF that 40–60% of today's jobs will be affected. She expects those workers to curate AI experiences and to verify what content is real, because plausible AI output means people can no longer tell fact from fiction, as with campaign videos.
  • Spio proposes blockchain validators to certify content accuracy. She says CEEK is building a platform with blockchain master nodes and validators dedicated to checking content, so users know what they consume has been validated. She concedes it will not be 100% accurate but argues it beats doing nothing.
Dr. Jon KrohnVR Made Women Nauseous — Until Mary Spio Found the Fix
  • VR headsets designed around men's eyes made women sick. Spio says that at demos, including one at Universal Music, most of the women who tried a headset ran to the bathroom to vomit. She traced it to interpupillary distance: headsets were built with a lower limit set at men's range, which sits at or beyond women's upper limit, pulling the eyes apart and causing strain and headaches.
  • Men and women judge depth from different visual cues. Spio says men rely more on an object's size to judge distance, while women rely on detail, so content rendering based on motion parallax and shape-from-shading felt unnatural to women. She says she designed a headset that resolves these issues, and her platform uses predictive rendering to keep content comfortable for everyone.
Dr. Jon Krohn890: The “State of AI” Report 2025 — with Jon Krohn (@JonKrohnLearns)
  • Small models now match what once took enormous ones. The host relays the Stanford HAI 2025 AI Index: in 2022 Google's PaLM, at 540 billion parameters, was the smallest model above 60% on MMLU, and by 2024 Microsoft's Phi-3-mini cleared the same bar with 3.8 billion, a 142-fold reduction in two years.
  • Inference for a given capability has become dramatically cheaper. Per the report, GPT-3.5-level performance (65% on MMLU) fell from about $20 per million tokens in November 2022 to 7 cents by October 2024, using a Gemini 1.5 model, a 280-fold drop in roughly 18 months; depending on task, prices fell between 9 and 900 times a year from 2023 to 2024.
  • Agents beat experts on short tasks but lose on long ones. On the RE-Bench benchmark launched in 2024, top AI systems scored four times human experts at time horizons of 2 hours or less, while humans outscored AI 2:1 at 32 hours. The host predicts that within a year agents will outperform humans on tasks of a dozen hours or more.
  • Corporate AI adoption jumped sharply in one year. Survey data in the report show company-wide AI use rising from 55% in 2023 to 78% in 2024, and generative AI use in business functions from 38% to 71%.
  • US private AI investment hit a record while China's kept falling. The report puts US private AI investment at $109 billion in 2024, about 20 billion above the 2021 peak, and Europe's at $19 billion. China's has fallen every year since peaking at around $25 billion in 2021, to $9 billion.
Crosstalk SolutionsZimaBoard 2 - A Homelab in the Palm of Your Hand!
  • The ZimaBoard 2 upgrades the original with faster CPU and networking. It moves to an Intel N150 CPU, dual 2.5 Gbps ports (from dual 1 Gbps) and an all-metal case for heat dissipation; it comes in an 8 GB RAM / 32 GB eMMC version and a 16 GB / 64 GB version, with two USB 3.1 ports, Mini DisplayPort up to 4K at 60 Hz, and two powered SATA 3.0 ports for a mini NAS.
  • It ships with ZimaOS but runs any x86 operating system. ZimaOS, IceWhale's CasaOS-based personal cloud OS, builds in remote access and RAID; the host lists Windows, Ubuntu, CasaOS, Proxmox VE, pfSense, OpenWrt and Unraid as alternatives.
  • The host had Plex, AdGuard Home and Pi-hole running on it. Plex on ZimaOS with an external SSD needed only a media location added to the container; AdGuard Home and Pi-hole were set up separately because both use DNS. The board was on Kickstarter at recording, scheduled to ship in August 2025; the video makes no sponsorship disclosure.
Dr. Jon KrohnSolving Global Talent Shortages with VR (feat. Mary Spio)
  • VR lets one instructor teach at a scale classrooms cannot. The host cites a US shortage of 400,000 K–12 teachers and ageing university faculty; Spio cites a stat she "saw somewhere" of a 4.6 million shortfall across Europe and North America, with Africa needing "a miracle". She says CEEK lets a single person present a course virtually to vast audiences, and the host notes she has described one professor teaching 100,000 students.
  • Electric-aircraft pilot training is a concrete demand case. Spio says putting 100,000 eVTOL pilots in service within a few years means training a million, which cannot be done in expensive, risky real aircraft. She says CEEK is working with a leading electric aircraft company with a massive backlog, and puts the operating cost at about 300 an hour against about 4,000 an hour in fuel for conventional helicopters.
  • The brain stores VR practice as real experience. Spio argues the brain cannot yet tell VR from reality, so trainees build memories and show up on day one with hours of practice already logged. She cites CPR training built for a children's hospital, where new mothers felt more confident than after watching a video.
  • Nurse turnover is a confidence problem VR can address. Spio says Baptist Health pursued a VR nursing residency because the average nurse is 50 and many new nurses leave within a year or two out of fear of hurting someone, not incompetence. She adds that some hospitals train intubation on paid low-income people, the homeless or elderly people with Alzheimer's, at around $50, which VR would replace.
Crosstalk SolutionsThe Most Powerful UniFi Protect Feature You're Not Using!
  • Protect's Alarm Manager can trigger on people, objects and events. Triggers include Face ID (known, unknown or specific faces), license plates, objects (person, vehicle, package, animal, or free-text AI Key prompts such as "FedEx truck" at 70% match confidence), line crossing, loitering, NFC or fingerprint scans, sound, UP Sense sensors and system events; stacked triggers like line-crossing-without-a-hard-hat need the AI Key.
  • Alarm actions go beyond notifications, including repositioning a PTZ camera. Actions cover app notifications, webhooks, UniFi Access door unlocks, sounds on the smart chime or upcoming horn speaker, lights, and PTZ moves to a preset that return home after a set time. The host found the feature at the bottom of Protect's menu on Protect 5.3.45 and UniFi OS 4.2.10, the latest at recording.
  • Slack alerts use a built-in "Slack post" webhook. The host, on Slack Pro at $87 per user per year and unsure whether the free tier works, creates a channel, builds a from-scratch Slack app with incoming webhooks on, and pastes its URL into Protect. He warns the webhook URL is public-facing and should be treated like a password, and suggests "ignore repeated action" at about 10 minutes to avoid spam.
  • Custom webhooks to other platforms are not yet dependable. Pushing alarms to Discord did not work natively, and a Make.com relay received Protect's data but failed to post, seemingly on permissions, though the firm's other Make.com and Zapier automations to Discord work fine.
  • Protect has no way to test-fire an alarm. Because a custom webhook only learns its payload when the alarm fires, setting up something like an animal or FedEx-truck alarm means waiting for the real event. The host says he asked Ubiquiti for a test-trigger button and hopes it arrives in a future version.
Dr. Jon KrohnAI Music and Virtual Concerts: How Entertainment Has Evolved (with Mary Spio)
  • CEEK stores users' content as blockchain assets they own. Spio, CEEK's CEO and CTO, describes it as a social platform where every post or video is a digital asset on the blockchain backed by the platform's own token, tradable and collectable, viewable with or without a headset (Apple Vision Pro, Oculus), with users keeping rights to their data. The host says it is backed by Universal Music, Meta, Apple and Microsoft and hosts experiences from Lady Gaga, Bon Jovi and Dwyane Wade.
  • AI music is the marketplace's best seller, and rights are what's sold. Spio says AI music is probably the most purchased item, bought by film supervisors and labels, because the marketplace sells streaming, sale or licensing rights rather than downloads. She argues this works because AI music usually has a solo creator owning the full rights, making smart-contract sales simple, unlike traditional music's many parties. She thinks the best AI music still has humans finessing it.
  • AI vocal enhancement trains the singer's natural voice. Spio says she uses AI to produce beats and enhance her vocals, "autotuning on a whole different level", and that hearing her own voice corrected has improved her natural singing fast enough that she now releases music under her own vocals rather than writing for others. She describes AI as letting her mix genres such as EDM and Afrobeat.
Dr. Jon Krohn889: AI-Powered Virtual Reality: The Future of Education and Entertainment — with Mary Spio
synopsis

Mary Spio, CEO and CTO of the VR platform CEEK, argues that immersive media combined with AI and blockchain can train people at a scale physical classrooms and aircraft cannot, and pays creators better than advertising does. She ends up holding that as AI floods the world with plausible content, the scarce things become verified, trusted voices and the human work of curating and validating them, which she says CEEK is built to supply.

What CEEK is. Spio describes a social platform where every post is stored as a blockchain asset the creator owns, viewable on Apple Vision Pro, Oculus or a plain screen. The host lists Lady Gaga, Bon Jovi and Dwyane Wade as users and Universal Music, Meta, Apple and Microsoft as backers. AI music, she says, is the marketplace's most purchased item, sold as streaming, sale or licensing rights to labels and film supervisors; solo AI creators own all the rights, which suits smart contracts. Origins. Born in New York and raised in Ghana, Spio watched a moon documentary during a military coup. She returned to the US alone at 16, became a US Air Force satellite technician, studied electrical engineering at Syracuse and Georgia Tech, and worked on SETI. Trying an Oculus at Facebook put her "on the moon"; an Adele concert where, in her telling, 10 million people chased 100,000 tickets suggested remote attendance. The focus has since moved to education.

Paid content over ads. Spio argues ad-based platforms work for maybe 3–5% of creators. A million YouTube views of eVTOL training might earn $3,000, against a thousand people paying 5,000 each on CEEK; BTS made 90 million in three days from a paid concert elsewhere.

Training at scale. Against a host-cited US shortage of 400,000 teachers and a 4.6 million figure Spio recalls, she says one instructor can teach at scale. Putting 100,000 eVTOL pilots in service means training a million; CEEK works with a leading electric aircraft maker whose cost she puts at about 300 an hour against 4,000 in helicopter fuel. Because the brain cannot yet distinguish VR from reality, trainees build real experience: CPR for new mothers, a Baptist Health nursing residency for staff who leave out of low confidence, and intubation practice that some hospitals, she says, now do on paid low-income or elderly people for around $50.

Headsets built for men. Women vomiting at demos led Spio to interpupillary distance: headsets started at men's lower limit, at or past women's upper one. Men, she says, judge depth by size and women by detail. She built a headset to fix both and uses predictive rendering.

Risk and verification. The host raises personalised VR deepfakes shifting political views. Spio cites Musk on certain mass unemployment and an IMF figure, as she recalls it, of 40–60% of jobs affected, and says CEEK is building blockchain validators to check content accuracy, not 100% but better than nothing.

Competing on value. CEEK won Universal Music over better-funded rivals by understanding entitlements and letting it drag and drop log files to port its library to every headset. Spio's philosophy: live from imagination, start before it's perfect, and go where you're valued, as she did when Boeing bought her patents.

  • CEEK is a paid, professional alternative to ad-based platforms. Spio, CEEK's CEO and CTO, describes a social platform storing content as blockchain assets users own, viewable with or without a VR headset. She argues ad-based platforms serve advertisers and work for maybe 3–5% of creators, and contrasts a million YouTube views of eVTOL training earning perhaps $3,000 with a thousand people paying 5,000 each. She cites BTS generating 90 million from a paid concert in three days, not on CEEK, and says a flood of content against finite ad inventory is squeezing ad-based platforms.
  • VR training scales scarce skills and builds real memories. Spio says putting 100,000 eVTOL pilots in service within a few years means training a million, and CEEK is working with a leading electric aircraft company; she puts its cost at about 300 an hour against about 4,000 in fuel for helicopters. Because the brain cannot yet tell VR from reality, she argues, trainees arrive with experience already built, as in CPR training for new mothers and a Baptist Health nursing residency aimed at turnover she attributes to low confidence, not competence.
  • Headsets designed around men's eyes made women nauseous. Spio traced women vomiting at demos, including at Universal Music, to interpupillary distance ranges set at men's lower limit, at or beyond women's upper limit, and to men judging depth more by size and women by detail. She says she built a headset that resolves this and uses predictive rendering on the platform.
  • Personalised immersive content needs verification, Spio argues, via blockchain. The host raises VR deepfakes tuned to shift political views; Spio cites Elon Musk on certain mass unemployment and an IMF figure, as she recalls it, of 40–60% of jobs affected, and expects displaced workers to curate and validate content. She says CEEK is building blockchain master nodes and validators to check content accuracy, conceding it won't be 100%.
  • Win on value to the ecosystem, not on funding. Spio says CEEK beat better-funded rivals at Universal Music by understanding entitlements and letting the label drag and drop its log files to port a multi-million library, distributed to Oculus, Apple Vision Pro and HTC Vive without separate builds; Meta funded it after it hosted thousands of people in one VR environment. Her success philosophy: live out of your imagination rather than your circumstances, start before it's perfect, and go where you are valued.
Dr. Jon KrohnQuantum Computing Will Change Everything. How Can You Prepare? (Dell's Chief AI Officer John Roese)
  • Viable quantum computing will be a bigger disruption than ChatGPT. Roese argues that because qubits let a machine evaluate many permutations at once, whatever AI is state of the art on that day will become "three, four, five orders of magnitude faster and better", in training and in agents' inference and reasoning. He notes quantum computers only do certain kinds of math well, and that machines able to break asymmetric cryptography do not exist yet but are coming.
  • AI and quantum computing are accelerating each other. Roese says AI is now being used to build, interface with and program quantum computers, speeding a historically slow path, while viable quantum machines will in turn give AI a far more capable computing infrastructure.
  • Enterprises should prepare now, though the date is a few years out. Roese puts quantum utility, then supremacy, "probably not for a few more years" but "not decades from now". A lay person need not worry yet, he says, but enterprises should act as if they could replay the November ChatGPT launch knowing in advance it was coming.
Dr. Jon KrohnThe New Jobs That AI Will Create (with Dell's Chief AI Officer John Roese)
  • Leaders owe workers concrete answers about which jobs AI creates. Roese says displacement fear is the main source of angst about AI, and saying "technology always creates jobs" is not enough for someone who expects to lose theirs. He says Dell drew up about a dozen specific future roles, published a few in an end-of-2024 blog, and is seeing them form organically inside the company.
  • "Software composers" will decide what AI should build. Roese argues AI cannot make architectural judgments by itself, such as microservices versus monolith, cloud native or not, or whether to follow the twelve-factor approach, and cannot act without a clear specification. He says he is asking universities for graduates who understand software architecture, can use coding assistants and need not write the code themselves.
  • "Thermal plumbers" combine disciplines GPU clusters now need. Running direct-liquid-cooled GPU clusters, Roese says, requires someone who understands computer hardware as well as thermodynamics and fluid dynamics to manage the thermal envelope. He says these are few but essential, and the role is already forming at large clusters.
  • "AI explainers" will deliver machine insights to people empathetically. Roese's examples are a genomics result showing risk of Alzheimer's or Parkinson's, an automated performance review, and a student the data predicts will fail. Each needs a human who understands the data and how the AI reached its conclusion. He calls this a large, non-technical path, possibly "the call center of the future".
  • Construction is the biggest job creator of the AI cycle. As a caveat to all of the above, Roese says the AI infrastructure build-out, employing construction workers, plumbers and electricians, is bigger than the US infrastructure bill of several years ago, a private-sector public-works project that will last a long time. He still warns the disruption is moving fast.
Dr. Jon KrohnWhy the Future of Work Will Be Done by Agent Teams (with Dell's Chief AI Officer John Roese)
  • An agent's value lies in the collective, as with people. Roese says Dell built its first autonomous agents over a year before recording, a two-agent system writing research reports, and every system since has had at least two agents and a human. One system flexed to 1,600 agents on a problem because agents could "hire" others when they lacked a skill.
  • The industry has no framework for agents working together. Roese says the message format is settled (JSON, human-readable text), but how to authenticate and authorise an agent, share knowledge across companies, or prompt a Dell agent and a partner's agent jointly is unresolved. He calls Anthropic's MCP a well-thought-out answer for models talking to data, and Google's Agent2Agent, announced the day before recording, promising for authentication and interworking.
  • De facto standards will arrive within the year, by consensus. Roese says he is "100% confident" that before the end of the year there will be de facto approaches to trustworthy agent interaction, emerging from industry activity rather than a standards body or a pure open-source project. He expects them to stay ring-fenced at "level four autonomy", not handling every corner case.
  • Existing security tools can be reused for agent ensembles. Roese argues authentication, authorisation and knowledge sharing need choosing among existing tools, not inventing, citing knowledge graphs, confidential computing and (partially) homomorphic encryption, which processes data without seeing it.
Scott HanselmanIs AI what Robotics needs? with Jasmine Lawrence Campbell
synopsis

Jasmine Lawrence Campbell is a technical product manager at a robotic-massage company and previously worked at Microsoft and Nvidia. She ends on augmentation over automation. The useful robots are narrow ones that take the dull, dirty or dangerous parts of a job while a human stays in control. She is wary of general-purpose humanoids and of the idea that plugging in an LLM solves robotics.

Why the home is hard. Hanselman asks why his phone is powerful while his robot vacuum is "dumb". She answers that factories are static and regulated and homes are not. Home devices have limited on-board compute, and their sensors are often used for a single purpose. SLAM gives a pirate-map outline that is rebuilt daily and does not distinguish movable objects from walls.

What intelligence actually involves. She argues people underestimate their own proprioception, and so call robots stupid for failing at what humans do unconsciously. Missing senses include touch texture, temperature and smell. Hanselman's story of his vacuum refusing a door that had once been shut leads her to human-in-the-loop correction, which she compares to coaching a toddler.

Designing around robots. Instead of asking a robot to carry grocery bags the human way, she would change the task, putting the groceries in a cart a robot can lift. She cites curb cuts and other accessibility adaptations as precedent.

Humanoids, LLMs and transfer. She is skeptical of humanoid demos that do not say whether they were sped up or teleoperated. She prefers narrow domains plus transfer learning, such as moving from vacuuming to painting a wall. LLMs suit dialogue but not turning words into actions and replanning. Specialist models per skill are more auditable but still need a central decision layer.

Augmentation. Automation needs task analysis few companies do. She sees robotic massage as a collaborator handling warm-up work for therapists who see 10-plus clients a day, and as a way to serve patients who need frequent sessions. She does not see it replacing the human relationship. Her resources for newcomers are Adafruit, KiwiCo, and Udacity and Coursera, where she teaches an AI product management course.

  • Home robots lag because homes change, not because hardware falls short. Lawrence Campbell, a technical product manager at a robotic-massage company, contrasted constrained, regulated factories with homes where shoes and rugs move daily. Robot vacuums are limited by on-device compute and by sensors dedicated to one job, such as lidar used only to detect ledges. Their SLAM maps are rebuilt each day without any sense of which objects move.
  • Robots look dumb because we underestimate our own intelligence. People have no conscious sense of the proprioception they use to navigate. She said the hardware may be ready while the software is "way farther away than we think", that touch and smell remain barely digitized, and that robots need human-in-the-loop coaching the way toddlers do.
  • Change the environment to suit robots rather than demand human dexterity. Her example was a cart a robot could lift whole, rather than expecting it to thread grippers through grocery-bag loops. She tied this to accessibility measures such as curb cuts, on what she called roughly the 35th anniversary of the US ADA laws.
  • Narrow robots plus transfer learning beat humanoid demos. She distrusts humanoid videos that do not disclose speed-ups, test conditions or teleoperation. She favors mastering one domain and transferring the skill, for instance from pushing a vacuum to painting a wall. LLMs help with dialogue, but she argued they do not close the gap from words to actions and constant replanning. A set of specialist models is easier to audit but still needs a central decision-maker.
  • Augmentation beats automation, including in massage. Full automation needs a depth of task analysis she said most companies will not do. She sees her company's robot handling warm-up work while a therapist does the detailed work, extending therapists' careers and serving people, such as lymphedema patients, who need massage several times a day.
Dr. Jon Krohn888: Teams of Agents: The Next Frontier in AI Collaboration — with Mike Pell
synopsis

Mike Pell, director of the Microsoft Garage, speaking live at the AI and Creativity Summit in Brooklyn, argues that AI is an exoskeleton that will soon act as a proactive, trusted co-worker, that the hard skills of most jobs will be automated, and that people's value will lie in communication and collaboration. He ends as an optimist: "we're getting to the good part".

Innovation without permission. Pell says Microsoft, since Nadella became CEO, chose to make curiosity cultural rather than grant 20% time: people are told not to ask permission, and to return with data.

From passive to proactive. Pell calls AI an Iron Man suit and agents the packaging that makes it feel like an adviser. He predicts assistants will soon interject unprompted, and warns users not to stop verifying once trust is earned. GitHub Copilot, he says, nearly died over early syntax errors; today Garage clients see three-day research tasks done in 30 seconds.

Teams of agents. Chaining tasks is the current state of the art, Pell says; agents completing ambiguous tasks together, in "swarms", is not close. The host warns that a 1% error rate compounds across 10 agents; Pell counters that review agents and orchestration could reduce it.

Soft skills and ubiquity. Pell says graduates lack debate and critical-thinking skills, and that AI should make people better teammates since engineering or medical knowledge will come from the system. He argues AI is already everywhere and will soon stop being called AI.

Audience questions. Asked how to keep up, the two suggest crowdsourced sentiment and the LMSYS arena. Asked about lost jobs, Pell cites Microsoft's book The Future Computed and history's precedents, urging people to focus on what they will do about it.

  • Innovation culture comes from not asking permission. Pell, director of the Microsoft Garage, says that since Satya Nadella became CEO about 10 years ago Microsoft has tried to build curiosity and experimentation into everyday work rather than offering 20% time. In practice that means telling people not to ask permission, just try it and bring back data proving whether it works.
  • AI is an exoskeleton; agents package it as a trusted co-worker. Pell describes AI as an Iron Man suit giving capabilities people would never have time to master. He predicts assistants will shift quickly from passive to proactive, interjecting during work ("did you really mean this part?"), and says trust must be earned through repeated correct behaviour without users falling "asleep at the wheel".
  • Early imperfection nearly killed GitHub Copilot. Pell says engineers dismissed the first versions over syntax errors, and that the tasks Garage clients are shocked by, such as market research, competitor analysis and go-to-market strategy, can drop from three days to 30 seconds.
  • Teams of agents on ambiguous tasks are not close yet. Pell says chaining tasks is the current state of the art, and coordinated "swarming" of agents is not near. The host notes frameworks such as CrewAI and argues a 1% per-agent error rate compounds across 10 agents; Pell answers that review agents and orchestration could instead lower errors.
  • Soft skills become the job as hard skills automate. Pell says graduates arrive smart but unable to communicate, debate or think critically in the moment, as with the Italian-style oral exams many American students would fail, and argues AI should be used to become a better teammate and collaborator. He holds AI is already ubiquitous, in Netflix and Amazon recommendations, and that within a year nobody will talk about it as AI. His advice to non-coders: take no class, talk to a chatbot like a person and start with small wins.
Crosstalk SolutionsFortinet + UniFi: Seamless Network Integration Guide
  • UniFi switches and APs work behind a FortiGate gateway. The demo uses a FortiGate 70F, a UniFi Flex switch and a U7 Pro, continuing the channel's FortiGate small-business setup video, and the host says the approach scales to as many UniFi switches and APs as needed while keeping the FortiGate's UTM features.
  • A FortiGate DNS entry lets new devices find a cloud controller. This is optional if a local controller sits on the same subnet, and set-inform over SSH also works. Otherwise, enable DNS Database under Feature Visibility, have DHCP hand out the FortiGate's .1 address as DNS, create a recursive DNS service on the internal interface, and add a "unifi" zone whose "@" entry points to the cloud controller's IP.
  • Already-running devices must reboot to pick up the new DNS. In the demo the U7 Pro appeared for adoption but the switch did not until both devices were rebooted and pulled fresh DHCP leases.
  • In UniFi, only VLAN IDs matter; the default subnet can stay wrong. The controller's default network shows the wrong subnet and can't be changed in the current version, which the host says is harmless with no UniFi router. Employee (VLAN 20) and guest (VLAN 30) are added as virtual networks with "third-party gateway" as router, then SSIDs are mapped to them.
  • Switch ports carry the VLANs the FortiGate defines. The FortiGate uplink and AP ports keep the default native VLAN and allow all tagged VLANs, since the AP needs both to serve its SSIDs; an access port, here port 2, is simply set to the guest network.
Dr. Jon KrohnThe Biggest AI Opportunity for Enterprises (with Dell's Chief AI Officer John Roese)
  • An enterprise is differentiated by its proprietary data and its unique skills. Roese argues these two are what AI must be applied to. Generative AI went after the first: RAG chatbots that embed proprietary data, such as service information, in a vector database and make it answerable, which he says almost all of Dell's production projects do, at industry scale for about a year.
  • Agents digitise narrow skills, not whole humans. Roese says agents go after the second source, taking an objective and reasoning through it autonomously to deliver an outcome equal to or better than a human's on that skill. Like geofenced self-driving cars or driverless airport trains, today's agents do one job; a well-rounded entity with ethics and morality is AGI/ASI and "a long ways away".
  • Agentic AI moves the human from in the loop to on the loop. In Roese's framing, reactive generative AI is a tool with the human doing the work, while with agents the human sets objectives and delegates, and work may stay "below the machine line" indefinitely. He says the architecture differs too: the LLM is the brain, with a knowledge graph holding memory and learned skills, and tool use and function calling giving it a body to act and perceive.
Crosstalk SolutionsHow Much Does This UniFi Enterprise Rack REALLY Cost?
  • The captions list the rack's contents but give no cost. The host walks the UniFi Enterprise rack at Ubiquiti's RSAC 2025 booth, top to bottom: an Enterprise 24 switch, a dual stack of EFGs, 100G aggregation switches, four 48-port Enterprise switches, three AI Keys, four Enterprise NVRs and a Power Distribution Pro. No prices are stated, despite the title.
Scott HanselmanEPISODE 16 - Scott & Mark Learn To… Feedback
  • Weigh feedback by the expertise and motive of its source. Hanselman said a TED speaker-coaching session had just told him "there's not a talk here". He decided to defer to the organizers' 13 years of running the event, since they want a good event and are not trying to hurt him. He argued younger people tend to read such feedback as an attack rather than ask what the giver wants.
  • "Data-driven" can be weaponized to block decisions. Mark said "where's the data?" often works as a smoke screen from teams that simply do not want to do something, followed by one objection after another. He added that new product categories cannot be backed by data in advance, citing a keyboardless phone.
  • Assume good faith until there is real evidence otherwise. Mark argued the people who assume everyone is acting in bad faith lead a miserable life, though he does not deny that people have hidden motives. Hanselman said how much good faith you can extend depends on culture, age, confidence and your standing during things like layoffs.
  • Separate feedback on the idea from its pitch and context. Mark recounted pitching what became Azure Resource Manager, a declarative, extensible application model, to the heads of Azure engineering and product, and getting a lukewarm "interesting". He blamed his selling and their priorities, kept his conviction, and the idea was built anyway. He also relayed a roughly 20-year-old study finding judges sentenced more harshly after lunch, and Hanselman said about half his podcast guests thank him for asking whether they are in a good headspace.
  • Receiving feedback is a skill, and you can choose what to take. Mark said holding your breath makes criticism harder to absorb, and that "feedback bookends" around criticism signal positive intent. Hanselman called feedback "a cafeteria". Mark said a brutal speaker coach some 10 years earlier caught tics he never knew he had, and he left some of them alone as "just who I am."
Dr. Jon KrohnWhich AI Projects Really Matter? Use This One Rule from Dell's Chief AI Officer John Roese
  • ROI is the first question before funding any AI project. Roese, Dell's global CTO and chief AI officer, says AI is useful only in service of a measurable outcome tied to an improvable process: profit, revenue, margin and cost for a company, educational outcomes for a university. AI that gives salespeople more time with customers, which Dell did, counts; AI that makes them slightly happier is meaningless unless measured.
  • Ask where AI should be applied, not where it could be. After the ChatGPT launch Dell received about 800 generative AI ideas, many of them, Roese jokes, inspired by Star Trek, and found it could not pick winners from them without context. Dell flipped the process: start from what it measures (profit, revenue, cost, regulatory risk), pick four areas (supply chain, sales, services and engineering), and find the biggest lever in each, such as sellers' content preparation and core coding in engineering. The host's research says the 800 were narrowed to eight.
  • Every enterprise is stuck at the same starting problem. Roese says every customer he talks to has hundreds of ideas and struggles to choose where to begin. Running 800 concurrent AI projects is impossible even for the largest companies, and debating them all leaves nothing in production.
Dr. Jon Krohn887: Multi-Agent Teams, Quantum Computing and the Future of Work — with Dell’s Global CTO John Roese
synopsis

John Roese, Dell's global CTO and chief AI officer, argues that enterprise AI succeeds only when tied to measurable business outcomes, and that the next phase, agents, will digitise an enterprise's skills just as generative AI unlocked its data. He ends up holding that agent-interworking standards will arrive by consensus within the year, that AI will create specific new jobs led by construction, and that viable quantum computing will be a bigger disruption than ChatGPT.

ROI first. Roese says early generative AI enthusiasm produced ideas without context, and that technology matters only when it improves a measurable process: profit, revenue, margin and cost for a company, educational outcomes for a university. AI that gives salespeople more customer time counts; AI that makes them slightly happier is meaningless unless measured.

From 800 ideas to four pillars. After Michael Dell's company-wide note, about 800 ideas arrived, many, Roese jokes, from people who had seen Star Trek. Dell found it could not choose among them, so it asked where AI should apply, picked supply chain, sales, services and engineering, and found the biggest lever in each, such as sellers' content preparation and core coding.

Escaping PoC prison. Dell's AI work began eight or nine years ago with bottom-up permission to experiment, at 500–1,000 projects a year, 80% with no business impact. Roese draws a bright line at production: there must be a material ROI, the project must fit "modern Dell" rather than cover bad processes, and only then come technical viability, security and compliance.

The flywheel. Well-chosen first projects generate ROI, and later ones reuse their technology at lower cost and higher speed. Starting with a goodwill project, Roese says, gives the flywheel no fuel; G&A waited. Sales came last because its data needed fixing, then Dell Sales Chat reached 20,000 sellers. He tells every organisation to start by naming what makes it special.

What agents are. Enterprises differ by proprietary data and unique skills. RAG chatbots unlock the first and account for almost all of Dell's production projects; agents digitise the second, taking an objective and working autonomously. Today's agents are narrow, like geofenced robotaxis or airport trains, and whole-human AGI/ASI is far off. The human moves from in the loop to on the loop, and the architecture adds a knowledge graph and tool use around the LLM.

Teams of agents. Dell's agent systems have always had at least two agents and a human; one flexed to 1,600 agents. The industry lacks ways to authenticate, authorise and share knowledge across companies. Roese credits MCP and Google's Agent2Agent, announced the day before recording, and is "100% confident" of de facto approaches before year-end, ring-fenced at level four autonomy and built from existing tools such as homomorphic encryption.

New jobs. Roese names software composers, thermal plumbers for liquid-cooled GPU clusters, and AI explainers who deliver results such as genomic risk empathetically, and says such roles are appearing at Dell. His caveat: the biggest job creator is construction, an AI build-out larger than the US infrastructure bill of several years ago.

Quantum. Roese says AI is accelerating quantum computing's development, and that once viable at scale, "probably not for a few more years" but not decades, quantum computing will make AI three to five orders of magnitude faster and better. Enterprises, he says, should prepare as if they knew the ChatGPT moment was coming.

  • Fund only AI that moves a measurable business outcome. Roese, Dell's global CTO and chief AI officer, says Dell's roughly 800 post-ChatGPT ideas could not be ranked without context, so it asked where AI should apply: profit, revenue, cost and regulatory risk, across four pillars (supply chain, sales, services, engineering). His gate to production is a material ROI, alignment with how Dell wants to run in future rather than "a big blanket" over bad processes, then technical viability and security and compliance. That gate is how he says companies escape "PoC prison".
  • High-ROI first projects start a flywheel that funds the rest. Roese argues later projects reuse the first one's technology and so cost less and ship faster, while starting with a goodwill project produces no fuel; Dell left G&A functions for later. Sales went last because its data needed fixing first, after which Dell Sales Chat went live for 20,000 sellers and, he says, exceeded expectations. Before ChatGPT, Dell ran 500–1,000 AI experiments a year, 80% with zero business impact, which he defends as building familiarity.
  • Agents digitise narrow skills, putting humans "on the loop". Roese says enterprises differ by proprietary data, which RAG chatbots have unlocked and which accounts for almost all of Dell's production projects, and by unique skills, which agents digitise. Like geofenced self-driving cars, agents do one job autonomously from an objective; whole-human AGI/ASI is "a long ways away". He says agent architecture differs too: an LLM brain plus a knowledge graph for memory and tool use to act.
  • Agent interworking standards will emerge by consensus this year. Dell has run multi-agent systems since its first two-agent research-report writer, once flexing to 1,600 agents that could "hire" others. Roese says authentication, authorisation and cross-company knowledge sharing are unsolved, praises MCP for model-to-data and Google's Agent2Agent, announced the day before recording, and is "100% confident" de facto approaches arrive before year-end, ring-fenced at "level four autonomy" and reusing tools such as homomorphic encryption.
  • AI will create named new jobs, but construction is the biggest. Roese lists software composers who decide architecture without writing code, "thermal plumbers" who manage liquid-cooled GPU clusters, and AI explainers who deliver AI findings empathetically, as with genomic risk results, and says such roles are forming inside Dell. Above all, he says, the AI infrastructure build-out exceeds the US infrastructure bill of several years ago. He also forecasts that viable quantum computing, "a few more years" away but not decades, will be a bigger disruption than ChatGPT, making AI three to five orders of magnitude faster.
Crosstalk SolutionsUbiquiti U7 Pro Outdoor: Do YOU Need to go Pro??
  • The U7 Pro Outdoor's 6 GHz radio only matters in high-density deployments. It adds 6 GHz to 2x2 MU-MIMO on all three bands, which the original U7 Outdoor lacks. The host expects the gain at venues like festivals with many Wi-Fi 7 clients, not in a home backyard; 6 GHz is opt-in at adoption since it is not legal everywhere.
  • It is a $279 outdoor AP with weatherproofing and PoE+. That is the US MSRP at launch, after a long wait for FCC approval. It has a 2.5 GbE port powered by PoE+, IPX6 rating or IP67 with the included cable gland (which the host recommends), wall and pole mounts, and roughly 300-client support.
  • The bundled external antennas make only 2.4 and 5 GHz omnidirectional. Without them all three bands are directional, about 90° per Ubiquiti's included diagram. The host can't say why 6 GHz stays directional and guesses the form factor lacked room for a third antenna; the antennas must also be enabled in UniFi, not just screwed on.
Dr. Jon KrohnNVIDIA GPU Benchmarking of Polars Revealed (with Jeroen Janssens and Thijs Nieuwdorp)
  • The authors benchmarked Polars on GPUs themselves, with vendor hardware. Janssens says Nvidia approached them on LinkedIn and Dell supplied a machine in its US lab where five professional workstation cards, including the RTX 6000 Ada generation, could be swapped. The pair insisted on producing their own numbers rather than copying promotional material, and the results are in the appendix of their book. The host notes Dell and Nvidia are two of the podcast's biggest 2025 sponsors.
  • Polars' GPU engine sits after its query optimiser. Nieuwdorp explains that Nvidia's RAPIDS team, maker of the GPU dataframe library cuDF, did not simply map the Polars API onto cuDF functions, because much of Polars' speed comes from its optimiser. Instead it built, with Polars, a GPU engine that takes the optimised plan; it was in open beta at recording.
  • GPU gains start on modest data, even on smaller cards. Nieuwdorp says data transfer to the GPU adds overhead, so speed-ups appear as data grows, but already from around 1 GB, sooner than the promotional material suggested. Even cards with fewer processors showed big speed-ups.
Dr. Jon Krohn"uv": The Extremely Fast Python Package Manager You Have to Use
  • uv replaced Poetry and Docker for the book's reader environment. Nieuwdorp says the authors started with Poetry plus separate Python-version tools and considered Docker for the companion notebooks repo, but settled on uv because readers need only install it and run uv sync, which sets up the right Python version and dependencies on any system.
  • Tooling performance is a feature in itself. Nieuwdorp places uv in the trend of Rust-based tools, like Polars, and says it can be more than 10 times faster.
  • uv's speed makes throwaway environments practical. Nieuwdorp says uv can create an ephemeral environment for a single command, which he used to benchmark successive Polars versions. He found a roughly 10% slowdown around version 1.2-something, traced it to two queries, and used a git-bisect script to identify the commit. The Polars team refactored that code the same week, which resolved it, though they had not pinned down the cause.
Dr. Jon KrohnGreat Tables: The Python Package That Makes Your Tables Pop
  • Tables are underserved by Python's visualisation tools. Janssens says that despite a myriad of plotting packages, Great Tables, created by his colleagues Rich Iannone and Michael Chow, is the only one he knows for producing presentation tables with colour, currency formats and mini graphs. Polars exposes it through the df.style accessor.
  • Format how data is shown; never change the data. Janssens objects to a post he saw that added dollar signs by converting numbers to strings. Styling should be a separate representation layer, he argues, so the underlying floats and integers stay intact for later calculations. He corrects the host's reading that the point is computational cost.
Dr. Jon Krohn886: In Case You Missed it In April 2025 — with Jon Krohn (@JonKrohnLearns)
synopsis

The host's April 2025 compilation stitches five clips into one argument about the AI hardware and software stack: from GPU software and custom cloud silicon, through deployment, down to chip packaging and back up to on-device inference. Each guest makes the case that matching the right compute and tooling to the workload, rather than reaching for the biggest resource, is where gains now lie.

Nvidia's software layer. Sama Bali of Nvidia (episode 883) describes NIM microservices, containerised models pre-tuned to the GPU so developers can swap models that turn over every couple of months; Dell's Logan Lawler says one line of code loads one. Bali adds NeMo for training and guardrails, AI Blueprints as reference workflows, and CUDA libraries she says speed preprocessing 100x (RAPIDS cuDF) and scikit-learn tasks up to 50x (cuML).

AWS silicon. Emily Webber (episode 881) traces Annapurna Labs from the Nitro system, which physically separates customer data from instance control, to Graviton CPUs, now over half of new AWS compute, and to Trainium, which she says leads EC2 for AI/ML on price-performance.

Deployment. Greg Michaelson of Zerve (episode 879) argues the data-scientist-to-engineer hand-off introduces errors, and describes per-canvas Docker environments, automatic serialisation and serverless APIs.

Packaging. Kai Beckmann (episode 875) explains heterogeneous integration, stacking dies or placing memory beside the GPU, and AI-driven materials discovery.

On-device AI. Shirish Gupta (episode 877) offers "AIPC": accelerated, individualised, private and cost-saving, citing a client spending 15% of data-centre compute on code generation it wants moved to NPUs.

  • Nvidia packages models as microservices so they can be swapped. In episode 883, Nvidia's Sama Bali explains that NIM (Nvidia inference microservices) containerise open, proprietary and Nvidia models pre-tuned to the GPU, because models turn over every couple of months, such as Llama 3 to 3.1 to 3.2. Dell's Logan Lawler says a NIM loads with one line of code. Bali says CUDA libraries such as RAPIDS cuDF can speed pandas- or Polars-style preprocessing by 100x on RTX 6000 GPUs without code changes, and cuML up to 50x for scikit-learn tasks.
  • AWS's custom chips rest on Annapurna Labs' Nitro work. Emily Webber of AWS (episode 881) says Amazon acquired Annapurna in 2015 to break up the monolithic hypervisor. Its Nitro system physically separates customer data from instance control, and every modern EC2 instance runs on it. She says more than half of new AWS compute is Graviton Arm CPUs, and calls Trainium 2 the most powerful EC2 instance for AI/ML, chosen mainly for price-performance and energy efficiency.
  • Data scientists outnumber the engineers who deploy their models. Greg Michaelson, Zerve's co-founder and chief product officer (episode 879), calls the hand-off a problematic dependency where mistakes creep in. He says Zerve gives every canvas a Docker container so environments are shared, serialises every variable so a trained model can be pointed at for an API route, and deploys on serverless Lambdas, letting data scientists ship their own software.
  • Heterogeneous integration scales chip performance beyond shrinking transistors. Kai Beckmann (episode 875) describes combining dies into one system, such as stacking memory or placing it beside a GPU (CoWoS-style structures) to shorten data transfer. He says it needs front-end-like precision, heat and power management, and new materials, which his company develops with AI-driven "materials intelligence" to cut unnecessary experiments.
  • "AIPC": accelerated, individualised, private, cost. Shirish Gupta (episode 877) gives his mnemonic for on-device AI. His examples: an ER physician's report drafts that learned the doctor's style, data that never leaves the device, and a financial-services customer spending 15% of data-centre compute on developers' code generation, which it wants offloaded to laptop NPUs. He concedes cloud inference costs are falling fast but argues for "the right engine for the right workload".
Scott HanselmanIs Vibe Coding Real? with James Montemagno
synopsis

James Montemagno, a co-worker of Hanselman's at Microsoft, ends where he began. Vibe coding is whatever flow suits you, and his own version keeps a "finger on the steering wheel": constant review, frequent commits, and a growing body of instructions and prompts that teach the agent his practices. Hanselman finishes "cautiously optimistic". He is persuaded that the prompts and workflows put him back in charge, but he still advocates a human in the loop and remains wary of vibing into production.

Defining the term. Hanselman credits Andrej Karpathy with the term, citing his 2023 line that "the hottest new programming language is English". He argues programming languages' strength is specificity, and he cites Simon Willison's view that reviewed, understood LLM code is not vibe coding. Montemagno places himself between the two definitions. He reviews as the agent streams and interrupts it when it heads the wrong way.

The app. The app is a sentiment-analysis tool for comments, grown from David Fowler's command-line scripts into Blazor, Azure Functions and Azure AI. Montemagno says he wrote 20 of about 17,000 lines and went from zero to deployed in three days of spare time. He worked in agent mode rather than ask or edit mode. He picks models by temperament, Claude being exploratory and GPT-4.1 direct, and he commits whenever something works, however ugly.

Context as the method. His custom-instructions file accumulates likes and bans and goes with every call, so he keeps it bounded. Prompt files hold reusable recipes, including a decision tree for new services, and he had the agent write a spec of a feature it had just built. He dictates long prompts by voice. Hanselman's takeaway is to carry prompts and MCP servers from machine to machine the way he carries his utils folder.

Where trust is extended. Montemagno reviews C# architecture closely and delegates CSS entirely. He admits a React app he generated without reading the code is only a prototype. He says speed is real but not "10x", that the gain is "different, faster", and that it saved him weeks.

Early-career developers. Asked what a 22-year-old should do, he recommends ask and edit modes first, instructing the agent to explain itself, and still learning data structures. He concedes that setup takes real effort and that long-term maintainability is unproven. His current step is refinement, using MCP servers to have the agent review the codebase and open its top 10 GitHub issues. He expects all of this to look different in three months.

  • Montemagno's vibe coding is a reviewed flow, not ignoring the code. He rejects "forget the code exists" and describes reviewing agent output as it streams, stopping and correcting it in real time. Hanselman set this against Simon Willison's line that code an LLM wrote but you reviewed, tested and understood is not vibe coding at all, and said he would not vibe code something into production. Both work at Microsoft, and Montemagno acknowledged "some bias" from working closely with the VS Code team.
  • He shipped a production app writing almost none of it. His sentiment-analysis tool for Reddit and YouTube comments, with a Blazor front end, Azure Functions and Azure AI, came to about 17,000 lines in his PR to David Fowler, of which he wrote 20, the Reddit JSON parsing the agent could not solve. It went from zero to deployed in three days of spare time. He said it would otherwise have about a tenth of its features and saved "weeks" of work, and that the tools had transformed how he works in the previous three to four months.
  • Persistent context is what makes agents reliable. He keeps a custom-instructions file, sent with every call and so kept moderate in size, that records what he likes and bans, such as "never write a test unless I tell you". Reusable prompt files carry decision trees for new services, and a co-worker's instruction makes the agent commit after every prompt. Hanselman compared carrying these prompts and MCP servers to his decades-old utils folder and dotfiles.
  • Trust tracks expertise: review your strong areas, delegate the toil. Montemagno controls the C# structure, services and dependency injection himself but leaves CSS and JavaScript to the agent; a full restyle took 15 to 20 prompts over about 30 minutes. He called a React app he generated without reading the code a prototype, and he picks models by temperament, Claude for exploring and GPT-4.1 to "just do the thing".
  • Beginners should learn fundamentals and use the tool to teach. Montemagno said a new developer should start in ask and edit modes and instruct the agent to explain, ask questions and link to code, and that data structures still matter. He conceded the setup is non-trivial and that maintainability a year or two out remains open. He used MCP servers (GitHub, Perplexity, Context7) to have the agent review his codebase and file its top 10 issues.
Dr. Jon KrohnFrom 500GB to 40GB: A Real-World Polars Success Story (with Jeroen Janssens and Thijs Nieuwdorp)
  • Polars rescued a pandas pipeline that could not scale. Janssens says Alliander, the Dutch grid operator which runs electricity and gas infrastructure for a third to half of the Netherlands, needed to cut cost and process far more data, but its Python and pandas code was inefficient and ran on a single AWS instance with over 700 GB of RAM. He believes it was one of the first companies with Polars in production, over a year before Polars 1.0.
  • Win over a sceptical team with one small benchmark. Janssens says the team was understandably wary of a library promoted by three consultants from Xomnia, where Polars was being developed. The consultants rewrote a piece of low-hanging-fruit pandas code in Polars and showed the speed and memory numbers. The full migration then went piece by piece, idiomatically rather than line by line, until R and pandas could be dropped as dependencies.
  • Memory per job fell more than tenfold. Nieuwdorp puts it at about 500 GB down to 40 GB, and attributes the drop partly to Polars and partly to restructuring code along the way.
  • Production use and book-writing exposed Polars' gaps. Janssens says real work surfaced missing features, such as weighted random sampling that pandas has, while filling in the book's reference tables revealed naming inconsistencies and missing operators. The authors fed these back to the project as issues and some pull requests.
Dr. Jon KrohnWhy Polars Is Replacing Pandas for DataFrame Work (with Jeroen Janssens and Thijs Nieuwdorp)
  • Polars code reads as declarative paragraphs, not nested brackets. The authors say pandas code is full of brackets and often hard to reason about, whereas Polars expressions (in their book's metaphor, recipes whose operations are steps and whose functions are cooks) compose into queries that read like a paragraph. Users declare the end result and leave processing and optimisation to the engine.
  • Polars was shaped by pandas' failures and strengths alike. Relaying conversations with creator Ritchie Vink, the authors say a formative frustration was pipelines crashing 20 minutes in on errors that could not be seen up front. Polars kept what Vink liked in pandas and borrowed from Spark, whose syntax it resembles, and from Rust. They stress they are not bashing pandas: without Wes McKinney's library there would be no Polars.
Crosstalk SolutionsWhy Run Cables?? Complete PTP Setup Guide 2025 ft. UISP Wave!
  • A point-to-point bridge is a "wireless wire", not client Wi-Fi. An access-point radio on the gateway's LAN shoots to a station radio that terminates into a switch, and phones or laptops need a separate Wi-Fi AP on the far side; it is also distinct from mesh kits like Orbi or Deco. Point-to-multipoint is the "Y cable" version WISPs use, as in the firm's Cerro Gordo ghost-town deployment.
  • Band choice trades speed against range and line-of-sight tolerance. 2.4 GHz reaches far and tolerates light trees; 5 GHz is faster but stricter; 60 GHz gives gigabit-plus but needs precise alignment and suffers in fog and rain. For a detached garage the host says a roughly $100 pair of 2.4 or 5 GHz LOCO radios suffices.
  • Ubiquiti's Wave line is 60 GHz with a 5 GHz backup. Point-to-point: Wave Pico $179 (1.3 km), Wave Nano $279 (5 km), Wave LR $379 (about 8 km, mostly a far-customer station), Wave Pro $599 (15 km paired). Wave AP Micro (90°) and Wave AP (30°, longer reach) are $499 PtMP access points; the 2 Gbps rating is 1 up plus 1 down, falling with distance, and backup runs about 200–300 Mbps.
  • Wave radios now take DHCP, but should be fixed. Unlike older gear defaulting to 192.168.1.20, they lease an address; the host pins them with a reservation or a static IP outside the DHCP pool. Setup on firmware 3.4.0 means switching wireless mode from the point-to-multipoint default, setting one side to main mode, and matching link name and strong security key.
  • The host's demo link ran near his gigabit line rate. Two Wave Picos side by side showed about 1.5 Gbps of 60 GHz link capacity and a speed test of about 900 Mbps down and 720 Mbps up. The video promotes design help from Rogue Support, Crosstalk's sister company, for picking among the overlapping models.
Technology and FriendsDee Peterson on An M365 Copilot Success Story [EPISODE 852]
  • One bank's Copilot rollout reached near-total adoption within a year. Peterson, a Microsoft customer success account manager covering banking, says the customer, a Midwest bank with a 10,000-person workforce using M365 Copilot with company and web data, started a pilot about a year before recording and has activated over 1,000 licenses at about 97% adoption. She reports use in its call center, finance and IT teams, and quotes the customer calling Copilot "a game changer" and an SVP calling it "my new best friend".
  • Addressing oversharing fears unblocked the rollout. The bank's initial restrictions came from security concerns, such as whether an employee could use Copilot to find the CEO's salary; Peterson says Microsoft's security controls and configuration, plus third-party solutions, resolved them. She credits the speed, in an industry Giard calls slow to adopt, to the account team's trusted-advisor relationship, contrasting organizations that build in-house chat tools until they find they are not getting the benefits.
  • One team's visible success spread demand across the bank. Peterson says the finance team was among the first to embrace it, using prompts to pull data from various files into dashboards of trends, forecasts and volume, work she puts at one to three days without Copilot. Seeing that team's results, others wanted to use it too.
  • Structured programs, not the tool alone, drove the adoption. After the bank's AI council approved the tool, Microsoft's AI Experience Accelerator put it in a room with peers from other banks to identify use cases and rank them short, medium or long term; around October of the prior year the customer asked for a "promptathon", an on-site prompt-design hackathon led by Microsoft's subject matter experts. A partner was brought in to roll out at scale because the bank did not want to take six months.
  • The rollout's estimated value is deliberately conservative. Peterson says a Microsoft business-outcome engagement put the potential value at $21 million, from time saved, process automation and customer-service impact, and that the real number was "probably bigger". She describes the next step, already starting, as custom agents built in Copilot Studio for specific business processes.
Dr. Jon Krohn885: Python Polars: The Definitive Guide — with Jeroen Janssens and Thijs Nieuwdorp
synopsis

Jeroen Janssens and Thijs Nieuwdorp, authors of O'Reilly's Python Polars: The Definitive Guide, released on the recording date of 1 April 2025, argue that Polars' declarative design and query optimiser deliver large real-world gains over pandas, demonstrated by a production migration that cut memory per job from about 500 GB to 40 GB, and by GPU benchmarks they ran themselves. Along the way they make the case for uv and Great Tables, both built on the idea that tool performance and clean separation of concerns are features in themselves. Both worked at Xomnia, where Polars was developed; Janssens had just moved to a developer-relations role at Posit.

Writing the book. Janssens tried Polars on joining Xomnia in January 2022, after noticing its creator Ritchie Vink working through lunch, and decided it deserved a book. O'Reilly had rejected four Polars proposals; theirs ran over 15 pages and was accepted hesitantly, then pressed once Polars took off. Janssens says you need not be an expert to start a book, only stay a step ahead; impostor syndrome comes with the process. Nieuwdorp drafts the rough first 80% and Janssens refines it. Asked whether machines will write such books, Janssens says a "stochastic parrot" can regurgitate, but new knowledge needs humans.

Why Polars reads better. The authors say pandas code is bracket-heavy and hard to follow, while Polars expressions compose into queries that read like paragraphs, with optimisation left to the engine. They stress they are not bashing pandas. Vink, they relay, was shaped by pipelines crashing 20 minutes in, and borrowed from Spark and Rust.

Alliander in production. The Dutch grid operator's pandas pipeline ran on an AWS instance with over 700 GB of RAM. A small benchmarked rewrite convinced a sceptical team, and an idiomatic, piece-by-piece migration over roughly six months to a year let R and pandas be dropped, over a year before Polars 1.0. Nieuwdorp puts memory per job at 500 GB down to 40 GB, partly from restructured code, and says the time once needed for 25 simulation samples later covered the 50 stakeholders wanted. Production work and the book exposed gaps such as weighted sampling, which went back to the project as issues and pull requests.

Tools around Polars. uv replaced Poetry and a planned Docker setup for the book's repo; Nieuwdorp used its throwaway environments to benchmark Polars versions and bisect a roughly 10% regression around version 1.2 to a single commit. Janssens says Great Tables, by his colleagues Rich Iannone and Michael Chow, should style a table's presentation without converting the underlying numbers to strings. For newcomers to the command line, the subject of his earlier book, he suggests a comfortable font and colours, aliases, an isolated Docker environment, and a little practice daily.

Vendors and rewrites. Nvidia and Dell, both podcast sponsors, supplied five workstation GPUs, on the authors' condition that they run their own benchmarks. Nvidia's RAPIDS team built a GPU engine fed by Polars' optimiser, not a cuDF translation, and gains appeared from about 1 GB, even on smaller cards. Janssens rewrote most of the visualisation chapter when Marco Gorelli switched Polars' unstable plotting backend from hvPlot to Altair; the two now collaborate on bringing Narwhals into plotnine.

  • Polars' declarative style makes pipelines easier to read than pandas. Janssens and Nieuwdorp, authors of O'Reilly's Python Polars: The Definitive Guide (released on the recording date, 1 April 2025), say pandas code is bracket-heavy and hard to reason about, while Polars expressions compose into a query that reads like a paragraph, leaving optimisation to the engine. They credit pandas as Polars' foundation, and relay that creator Ritchie Vink was shaped by pipelines crashing 20 minutes in, borrowing from Spark and Rust.
  • A production migration cut memory needs by an order of magnitude. At Alliander, memory per job fell from about 500 GB to 40 GB. The Dutch grid operator's pandas pipeline ran on a single AWS instance with over 700 GB of RAM. The authors won over a sceptical team by benchmarking one small rewrite, then migrated idiomatically until R and pandas were dropped. Nieuwdorp says the same time frame that once fit 25 simulation samples later fit the 50 stakeholders wanted, with code restructuring contributing alongside Polars.
  • The GPU engine pays off on modest data sizes. With five Nvidia workstation cards in a Dell lab, both companies being podcast sponsors, the authors ran their own benchmarks for the book's appendix rather than reuse promotional figures. Nieuwdorp says Nvidia's RAPIDS team built an engine that takes Polars' optimised plan instead of mapping the API onto cuDF. Speed-ups appeared from around 1 GB, sooner than promotional material implied, and even on smaller cards.
  • uv is fast enough to change how tools get used. Nieuwdorp says uv replaced Poetry and a planned Docker setup for the book's repo, since readers need only uv sync. Its speed allowed throwaway environments per command, which he used to benchmark Polars versions, find a roughly 10% regression around version 1.2-something, and git-bisect it to a commit.
  • Format a table's presentation, never its data. Janssens says Great Tables, by his colleagues Rich Iannone and Michael Chow and exposed in Polars via df.style, is the only Python table-styling package he knows. Turning numbers into strings to add dollar signs breaks later calculations. He also recounts rewriting most of the visualisation chapter (16) when Marco Gorelli switched Polars' plotting backend from hvPlot to Altair, a feature then marked unstable.