Souk's Notes - Unofficial Summaries

Unofficial, machine-generated summaries, as of 2026-11-09.

Dr. Jon KrohnLLM Selection Has Become Exhausting (with Lin Qiao)
  • Model choice matters, but fast model depreciation makes it exhausting. Qiao, CEO of Fireworks AI, says a new leaderboard leader appears every couple of weeks, labs are diverging into chat, coding and agentic, multimodal and long-context specialties, and public benchmarks are saturated. Choosing therefore has to be continuous as use cases evolve.
  • Hardware now depreciates just as fast. Where a new hardware SKU used to arrive every 3 years, Qiao says NVIDIA launched three new SKUs last year, and 2026 will bring many more GPUs and custom ASICs from other vendors. Mapping workloads to model, hardware, inference setup and fleet design needs scarce expertise, which Fireworks aims to abstract away.
  • Open-model performance is converging with closed models. Qiao says Fireworks bet early on open models after internal debate, out of the open-science conviction of a team that built PyTorch. She predicts 2026 is the year the convergence becomes more prominent.
GeoHussarIran been preparing for a war with the entire West for almost 50 years #iran #usmilitary #warfare
  • Iran's decentralized IRGC command is built to survive decapitation strikes. He describes mountain-hidden, elevator-raised underground missile launchers, a succession "stack" behind every commander, and hundreds of independently acting cells able to fire from locations of their own choosing.
  • He argues the US has matched Iran's decades of prep with continuously renewed invasion plans. He cites an original 1980s plan (Plan 1002), a full rewrite around 2006, and yearly updates since, contrasting Iran's static long-term strategy with an evolving American one.
  • He suggests deep infiltration since 2007 means Iran's own launch orders may originate elsewhere. He describes an unnamed country building a drone factory inside Iran using Iranian engineers and resources, and notes the US tracks missile heat signatures via over 5,000 satellites while Iran's decentralized cells are cut off from the internet, leaving them open to jamming and fake intel.
Professor G MarketsTrump Admits More Americans May Die in Iran War — Voters Are Turning on Him
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
Professor G MarketsScott’s Early Career Advice, How Dating Apps Are Making You Lonelier, and Navigating Conflict With Business Partners
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
Scott HanselmanI felt guilty when no agents were running
  • Time with no agent running had started to feel wasted. Hanselman says the feeling of wasting time came a few days earlier, sitting with no agent running, and calls it "not a healthy thought".
  • The strain comes from always having one agent waiting. In Yegge's "vampire bubble" framing, enough agents means one always needs you. If agents could work trustworthily on their own for 4 to 6 hours, he suggests, people might work 6-hour days. He then relays the doomsayer view that AI will do all the work in 2 years, so the cognitive load should be enjoyed while it lasts. The clip is from the Steve Yegge episode.
GeoHussarThe US and partner have done an incredible job of intercepting drones+ missiles. But it isn’t enough
  • High interception rates haven't spared Gulf states from real damage. He cites the UAE at roughly 93% ballistic-missile and 88–94% drone interception, Kuwait near 100%, and Qatar around 97% ballistic and 92–96% drone, while Bahrain had the lowest rate and lost a major refinery, which he links to oil briefly hitting $80 a barrel.
  • Ukraine has offered to help fill Gulf air-defense gaps against Shahed drones. He calls Ukraine unmatched in drone warfare and frames the offer as notable given the administration's earlier treatment of the country.
  • He argues eroded trust, not interception statistics, is the lasting cost. He contends Gulf states would not have been attacked absent the US strike on Iran, and that even a fully successful campaign against the IRGC will require compensating these states for the damage they've absorbed.
Y CombinatorCommon Mistakes With Vibe Coded Websites
synopsis

AI coding tools have made a professional-looking landing page nearly free to produce, but Garry Tan and YC visiting partner Raphael Schaad's review of six YC company sites arrives at a warning: the same training data that lets a good idea spread instantly also flattens every startup's site into the same purple-gradient, fade-in, scroll-jacked template, and only a founder who stays the deliberate "editor" of the AI's output — rather than accepting whatever it generates — ends up with something distinctive.

Why everything suddenly looks the same. Schaad traces the pattern to how it started: he noticed a wave of "dumb hover effects" on startup landing pages and realized that once one well-linked site established a trend, it entered LLM training data and propagated to every other AI-built site within a week, instead of the months such copying took in the pre-LLM era. The clearest symptoms across the reviewed sites — new.ai/Nunu, Rosebud AI, Get Crocs, Sphinx, Build Zero, Zarna — are near-identical purple gradients, sections that fade in and out on scroll, and animated lines that trail the cursor down the page.

Motion and hover used against the user. Several sites use hover to make menu items and buttons fade or disappear rather than "pop," which Schaad calls an anti-pattern since browsers already signal clickability with the cursor and hover has no mobile equivalent. Get Crocs's call-to-action button chases the cursor around the screen, and Zarna's scroll-jacked page — plus Sphinx's auto-advancing, reshaping buttons — leave reviewers unable to tell what's clickable or how far into the page they are, pulling attention away from the actual value proposition.

What actually works. Not every AI-enabled effect fails: Nunu's hover-triggered card animations are called "tasteful," reinforcing the brand with imagery too costly for a human to have hand-coded, and Sphinx's headline is praised for clearly stating what the product is, who it's for, and why they should care — the three things Schaad says must sit above the fold.

The fix. Tan and Schaad's shared advice: QA everything by hand, since one-shotted pages ship undetected bugs (a broken selection state on Build Zero, semi-clickable elements on Zarna) that a hand-built site wouldn't; and start from your own brand and color palette rather than the AI's defaults, using the time AI saves to sharpen messaging and product instead.

  • LLM-trained design clichés are homogenizing startup websites overnight. Raphael Schaad, YC visiting partner, argues purple gradients, cursor-trailing lines, and scroll-triggered fade-ins spread instantly once one well-linked site enters LLM training data — a process that used to take months of manual copying before AI design tools existed.
  • Hover effects on AI-built sites frequently hide rather than reveal. Menus and buttons on sites like Nunu (new.ai) fade or vanish on hover instead of "popping," which Schaad calls an anti-pattern since browsers already signal clickability and hover has no mobile equivalent, making it a poor place to hide essential functionality.
  • Scroll-jacking and cursor-chasing buttons distract more than they convert. Garry Tan and Schaad found Get Crocs's roaming call-to-action button and Zarna's hijacked, molasses-slow scroll pulled their attention away from the actual value proposition rather than toward it.
  • Founders must edit AI output, not accept it as final. Schaad points to undetected bugs shipped on one-shotted pages — a broken selection state on Build Zero, semi-clickable elements on Zarna — and advises starting from a company's own brand and color palette rather than whatever the AI defaults to.
Technology and FriendsChris Woodruff and Joe Guadagno on morespeakers com [EPISODE 896]
  • The site aims to bring younger speakers back to conferences. Woodruff says morespeakers.com the idea came from a late-night conversation at DevSum in Stockholm with Scott Hunter, a Microsoft vice president, about the rising average age of conference speakers. Woodruff's explanation is that would-be younger speakers are making YouTube and Twitch content from home instead; he started the site last August or September as a marketplace connecting new speakers with experienced mentors.
  • The first unconstrained AI-generated build was unmaintainable. Guadagno says Woodruff's Claude Code version worked, but its three feature sets, built from different prompts, looked "like three different engineers built it," so nothing more could be added. He refactored it piece by piece into something that looks like a rewrite, and the repo now carries agents, commands and instructions for Claude Code, GitHub Copilot and JetBrains Junie to keep generated code within set patterns.
  • The site is server-rendered but built to behave like a SPA. Woodruff chose HTMX on ASP.NET Core Razor Pages to make a server-side app behave like a SPA, swapping page sections with HTML returned from page handlers. Everything runs on Azure: Guadagno lists App Service, Azure Functions processing queued sign-up emails sent through Azure Communication Services, Azure SQL, and blob storage for speaker images not yet in use, with .NET Aspire setting up the open-source project's development environment.
  • Mentorship requests are capped and need the mentor's consent. Guadagno says users register as new or experienced speakers, which only changes a profile badge; anyone can request a mentor, but only two at a time, and the mentor can decline. Matched pairs get each other's email for now; a calendar and a moderator-matching feature suggested by Steve Smith, modelled on CodeMash's speaker-help program, are ideas for later.
  • Traction is weak, mostly experienced speakers, and time is the constraint. Woodruff says they have done little marketing and still need to work out where aspiring speakers are, and they are asking for contributors. Giard suggests targeting people who give the 10-minute lightning talks his Chicago cloud computing user group recently started, and Woodruff offers to reach user groups through his seat on the .NET Foundation board and its newsletter.
Professor G MarketsThe $2 Trillion Risk Investors Can’t See — with Steve Eisman
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
Dr. Jon Krohn972: In Case You Missed It in February 2026 — with Jon Krohn @JonKrohnLearns
synopsis

The host's February 2026 compilation runs four clips from earlier interviews. Taken together, they say that today's AI gains come from engineering at scale and reinforcement learning, while human-like generalisation and fully autonomous operation remain out of reach.

Falcon on Lightning AI. Will Falcon says he never meant to start a company. PyTorch Lightning spread, VCs came calling, and about 10 term sheets arrived after one trip. He describes his FAIR work as solo pre-training on up to 8,000 GPUs and, more distinctively, as writing the loss function to model the world.

Griffiths on human constraints. Tom Griffiths frames human intelligence as adapted to short lives, limited neural compute and narrow communication. AI faces none of these, so it will diverge unless designers engineer human-like inductive biases, which he says is much harder than scaling.

Amazon's Nova Act. An Amazon member of technical staff says agents averaging 60% reliability are useless in production. Nova Act targets 90% or more by training with reinforcement learning in "web gyms" that teach it to cope with changing interfaces.

Murugesan on quantum routing. Praveen Murugesan of Samsara sees quantum computing turning vehicle routing from approximation into optimisation, but says self-operating systems are far off.

  • An open-source hit dragged its author out of research into a startup. Will Falcon says he wanted to stay in research, where he was pre-training models on up to 8,000 GPUs as a single person, and nearly shut PyTorch Lightning down because users kept pulling him into coding. After one trip to meet VCs he had about 10 term sheets by the Monday. He credits FAIR with teaching him to translate a modelling problem into the loss function itself, which he says most pre-training today, being engineering, no longer does.
  • Human intelligence is shaped by constraints that AI systems lack. Tom Griffiths of Princeton points to short lifetimes, a couple of pounds of neurons, and low-bandwidth communication, which force humans to learn from little data, search selectively and coordinate through language and institutions. AI escapes all three, so he expects a different kind of intelligence unless builders deliberately engineer human-like inductive biases. That is far harder than scaling, which is why scaling dominates now.
  • Production agents need far more reliability than demos show. An Amazon member of technical staff (episode 963) says an agent reliable 60% of the time "is 0% useful". She says Nova Act, generally available since re:Invent in December, targets 90%+ reliability on browser UI automation. She says this comes from reinforcement learning across hundreds of "web gyms", replicas of form-filling and shopping UIs where agents self-play through thousands of tasks and learn to generalise when buttons move or change labels.
  • Quantum computing could move routing from approximation to optimal solutions. Samsara's Praveen Murugesan says vehicle routing with many stops, route segments and real-time traffic is solved today only by approximation. He sees quantum as the opportunity for optimal answers, but says truly self-operating systems are nowhere close because compute and real-time data access still limit them.
GeoHussarThe miracle…
  • He announces that his kidney transplant to his sister is confirmed for the following Tuesday. The donation had been pursued for almost a year and was repeatedly delayed by setbacks in his sister's health, which he says has now fully cleared; he thanks followers for their support during a period when her condition looked poor.
Professor G MarketsIs AI a Threat to Privacy? — with Meredith Whittaker
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
Professor G MarketsKristi Noem Fired as Trump's Iran War is about to Hit Americans Hard
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
All Things FinancialNo fertilizer, no harvest, no harvest, no bread. Fertilizer is the silent tax on your dinner plate 3-5-2026
  • His three-year-old conclusion about how to invest in food was to buy the fertilizer, not the food. A food producer facing higher input costs simply has compressed margins and must raise prices — the exposure is on the wrong side. The analogy he uses: if oil is going up you would rather own the oil than the oil company, because the percentage move is better. He concedes openly that fertilizer is difficult for retail investors to actually buy, which is the honest caveat.
  • What transits the Strait of Hormuz is the number that turns an energy story into a food story. 44% of sulfur, 31% of urea, 18% of ammonia and 15% of phosphate — with roughly 35% of global urea exports and 45% of global sulfur exports moving through the waterway. Urea is the most widely used nitrogen fertilizer and underpins about half of global food production. The price moves are already violent: urea from $130 to $570–650 a ton, Egyptian export prices up $125 to around $610–625, and ammonia futures at $725 against roughly $130 for the February contract. Natural gas — the feedstock for nitrogen fertilizers — went from $10.60 on Friday to $20 on Monday, which raises production costs on top of the supply loss.
  • The timeline is what makes this urgent rather than merely expensive. Fertilizer that does not reach fields produces a 50% yield decline in the first harvest — this year, not next. Consumers see bread within six to ten weeks, eggs within a few months, pork and chicken within six. Analysts quoted judge the disruption potentially more damaging than the food shock from the invasion of Ukraine. On the supply side, Morocco holds roughly 70% of global phosphate reserves through a state-owned producer that is 94% government-held and not publicly traded — with a possible 2027 listing — while Canada dominates potash at 52% of global reserves.
GeoHussarA scary new weapon currently being used today #laser #helios #navy #defense
  • Laser weapons are now countering drones and missiles at near-zero marginal cost. He describes the US Helios system (naval-mounted) and an allied "Iron Beam" system, both with roughly 10 km range, costing about $2–$2.50 per shot against a $20,000 Shahed drone or million-dollar short-range ballistic missile, with intercepts effectively instantaneous at light speed.
  • He contrasts this with the roughly $300 million a day spent during the 12-day war. That earlier cost relied on traditional systems — Iron Dome, David's Sling, Arrow 3, Patriot, and fighter jets — at an 85–90% interception rate, versus what he says is now about a penny per dollar of incoming short-range weaponry.
  • He notes lasers aren't 100% effective but free up other systems for longer-range threats. Even when interception fails, he argues the cost and build-time asymmetry favors the defender, since a drone or missile takes far longer to build than a laser shot takes to fire.
Y CombinatorStartup School 2026
  • YC's Startup School returns for two days in San Francisco, July 25–26, with speakers including Jensen Huang, Sam Altman, Alexander Wang and Jeff Dean. The event targets top undergrads, grad students and researchers in CS, ML, applied math and engineering, offering direct access to YC partners and alumni; YC says over 100 attendees from last year's event are now YC founders.
GCastScheduling a Microsoft Copilot Prompt [GCast 212]
  • Copilot can re-run a prompt on a recurring schedule. Giard's example asks for tomorrow's accepted meetings and how to prepare for each one. He runs it with the Work tab selected, which gives Copilot access to whatever he has permission to see: email, calendar, Teams messages and OneDrive.
  • The "schedule this prompt" icon under a response sets the schedule. You choose a start date and time (he picks 4:30 that day) and the days of the week (he picks Monday to Thursday). You also set the number of runs: a run can't repeat forever, and 15 is the maximum. An option sends an email with a link to the response when it is ready.
  • Scheduled prompts are managed from the three-dot menu. Under "Scheduled prompts" you can run one now, edit its time, days and email setting, or turn it off. Turning it off only makes it inactive, for example while on vacation. Deleting removes it for good. A debug panel shows exactly what is being sent to Copilot, to pass to tech support if something goes wrong.
Professor G Markets$500M Bet On The Iran Strike — Before It Happened
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
Dr. Jon KrohnWhy Enterprises Will Build Their Own Specialized AI Models (with Lin Qiao)
  • Reinforcement fine-tuning specialises a model, at the cost of breadth. Qiao, CEO of Fireworks AI, compares RL to people learning from positive and negative feedback, and to breeding fruit sweeter and bigger by selecting seeds over generations. A model rewarded this way finds a path to solving certain problems very well but becomes "less specialized in other areas". The host describes Fireworks' product as letting customers beat frontier closed models on specific tasks in under a month.
  • A model that keeps learning from your application becomes a moat. Qiao argues that a private model continuously tuned on product data gives what "nobody else built on top of an existing API would have".
  • Using product data to improve models mirrors mobile's A/B testing. Mobile widened reach by orders of magnitude, so no single design or team of PMs could serve every cohort, and A/B testing turned product signals into decisions. Qiao says the same logic now applies to the model under the product, a space she calls "a vacuum" with no existing solution.
GeoHussarIt’s not a matter of “if”the United States will defeat the IRGC. It’s a matter of when.
  • Damage to Iran vastly outweighs Iran's retaliation, he argues, citing 24-hour-old figures. He reports over 40 senior Iranian leaders killed since Operation Epic Fury began, a meeting to choose Khamenei's successor bombed, 200 air defense systems hit, 20 leadership-linked sites and 600 infrastructure sites struck — numbers he expects to run 15–25% higher by the time of viewing.
  • He estimates Iran's ballistic missile stockpile has been roughly halved. From a starting force of 2,500, he says about 800 were launched and 500–700 destroyed, leaving a conservative estimate of 1,200 remaining, fired by decentralized cells acting on outdated orders with no central coordination.
  • He frames a widening coalition as accelerating Iran's collapse. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the UAE have moved from neutral to retaliatory postures, and the UK, France, and Germany — including a French aircraft carrier — are deploying resources; he predicts Iran will run out of weapons before its opponents do.
Professor G MarketsTrump Demands Uprising in Iran — History Says This Ends Badly with Tim Snyder
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
Loss DogOptions Trading &...Wives & Mistresses? #optionstrading #shorts #wearelossdog #funny
  • A joke frames marital arrangements as having an "optimum," mirroring options and salary advice. The bit draws a comic parallel to optimal options selling at 45-to-21 days to expiration and an optimal salary age of about 40, then proposes one wife plus three mistresses as the equivalent optimum; Tom and Scott are asked to weigh in and both decline to answer directly, while Sal says he's sticking with one wife and no mistresses.
Master InvestorRuchir Sharma On Iran War Market Reaction
  • The Iran war has triggered de-grossing, not a fundamental repricing. Sharma says markets have been relatively calm so far. The hardest-hit markets, such as Korea and Brazil, were the ones that had risen most. Korea's oil-import exposure explains some of its fall, but he says it also had leverage and heavy retail speculation. Brazil fell only because it had run up in recent weeks.
  • Panic in regional markets would mean the conflict is spiraling. His condition: if markets in the region begin to panic, that would show the conflict spinning out of control. Looking back, oil and gas would then appear to have under-reacted. So far he does not hold that view.
Technology and FriendsSarang Brahme on Industrial Scale Agentic AI in Hospitality and Restaurant Analytics [EPISODE 895]
  • The project analyzes guest reviews for restaurant chains across North America. Brahme, a principal architect in Longview Systems' AI practice, says hospitality runs on thin margins with performance that varies by location, shift, season and crowd. The system ingests reviews from Google, Yelp and the client's proprietary table devices, which ask about 10 to 15 rated questions per venue plus a free-text verbatim section.
  • One sentiment score per review cannot capture mixed verdicts. Reviews run from two words to ten lines and often praise one thing while faulting another, so the model extracts entities per objective (food might score 0.9, service 0.5) and weights them. He contrasts this with standard NLP, which returns a single score between zero and one per sentence.
  • Agents answer the questions BI reports cannot. He says the clients already have BI showing what happened; agents let managers ask open questions in plain English, such as who earns the most tips in a California region on a Sunday evening, or what past Super Bowls meant for a nearby restaurant. Two further agents generate tasks for staff from reviews and point-of-sale data, and write a personalized response to each reviewer.
  • The framework is built for industrial-scale concurrent use, not demos. Brahme says it targets 5,000 to 10,000 concurrent users across the US and Canada, and lists Microsoft Fabric as primary storage, the Microsoft Agent Framework, a Databricks medallion architecture and a containerized UI on Azure. Access is scoped by role, from restaurant manager to managing director, and kept separate between customers; he calls it one of the first agentic systems at this industrial scale, possible only through Microsoft's framework.
  • It is an MVP under evaluation, with full features expected by summer. Work began last summer; he says the client's internal beta users called plain-English, repeatable answers a game changer. Next is opening it to 100 to 500 evaluators, then general availability, and adding more review platforms, an events database (Super Bowl, World Cup matches) and weather and demographic data.
Professor G MarketsWhy The Iran War Could Reignite Inflation
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
Dr. Jon KrohnAutonomous Intelligence vs AGI (with Lin Qiao)
  • Most of the world's data never reaches AGI labs' models. Qiao, CEO of Fireworks AI, which the host says has raised over $300 million including a $250 million Series C, says more than 90% of data is private, locked inside applications and enterprises. She calls her complement to AGI "autonomous intelligence": continuous, fully automated customisation of models and inference to each application. She predicts "millions of models, one per application" rather than one model ruling all.
  • Coding agents now work like junior engineers, changing how her company hires. Qiao says the company is questioning whether coding interviews still matter and expects them to be replaced by how well candidates use coding agents. She adds that AI frees people at the "high intelligence level" first, while robotics will disrupt physical work.
  • Model customisation is an expert craft she wants automated. Today only a few talent-dense companies can continuously adapt models and inference setups. Qiao's aim is to give ordinary application developers that capability without the years of accumulated knowledge.
Scott HanselmanThat's good Mojo - Creating a Programming Language for an AI world with Chris Lattner
synopsis

Chris Lattner, creator of LLVM and the original architect of Swift, now at Modular, ends the conversation on a practical position: AI is a profound tool that closes gaps and removes boilerplate, but it follows the middle of the distribution, so human judgement decides whether software is good. His bet is that the real unsolved problem is not rewriting C in Rust but programming the GPUs and accelerators nobody can easily use, which is what Mojo is for.

Every era panics. Lattner has followed AI since 2016 and sees AI coding as an accumulation of exponentials. Hanselman lists past panics, from assembler to C to syntax highlighting. Lattner adds Swift's launch, when expert Objective-C developers resisted losing their guru status while newcomers embraced it. He sees the same split over AI and argues for the middle path.

Code as craft and investment. Lattner separates writing code from building software: architecture, design and what "better" looks like are human questions. Hanselman pushes on AI-generated art and poetry; Lattner says it depends on the goal, as a woodworker's hand plane differs from a cabinet shop. He argues outcomes are not all that matters, because software must keep adapting and that needs people who understand it.

The Claude C compiler. Asked directly whether it is good, Lattner calls it impressive for zero human input but unsurprising: $10,000 of tokens over two weeks, hill-climbing on tests, transcoding existing compilers into Rust. Hanselman calls it "mid" in the bell-curve sense. Lattner agrees and goes further: LLVM is 25 years old and not the best, so following it means staying behind, and he dismisses claims of imminent job loss as unsupported by data.

Why the next problem is hardware. CPU scaling has stalled and the money is in GPUs and ASICs. Lattner compares today's vendor stacks to the incompatible C compilers before GCC unified them and made Linux possible, and says Modular is structured to be independent of any one vendor. At Google, where he built MLIR and a TPU runtime, six-month review cycles made long work hard to justify.

Mojo. The founders vowed not to build a language, spent a year on runtimes and kernels to beat Intel's libraries, then found they needed one with library-level extensibility for new number formats. Lattner says Mojo already runs customer workloads across Nvidia, AMD and Apple GPUs and many CPUs. He concedes it is not yet stable: a 1.0 beta is expected around April or May and 1.0 with compiler open-sourcing around August or September, as of the recording.

  • AI coding is a profound tool; neither dismissal nor doom fits. Lattner, creator of LLVM and original architect of Swift, now at Modular, has used Cursor as his daily driver for over a year. He compares today's split to expert Objective-C developers resisting Swift while newcomers welcomed it, and expects those who learn the good and bad uses to grow fastest. He dismisses AGI-driven predictions because it "has not happened and it may not happen", and says there are more programmers than ever and the job market is "quite hot".
  • Software is an investment that needs human judgement, not just outcomes. Requirements always change, Lattner argues, so passing unit tests is not enough: you need people who understand the code well enough to adapt it. AI can encourage sloppiness and laziness, including handing teammates unread code to review. Hanselman's framing contrasts IKEA with hand woodworking; Lattner's is that the right tool depends on whether you want the output or the act of making.
  • The AI-built compiler shows models follow the distribution, not the frontier. Lattner says Anthropic's effort took $10,000 of tokens over two weeks of agent swarms hill-climbing on failing tests, and transcoded LLVM, GCC and other compilers into Rust with nothing novel. He calls LLVM itself 25 years old and "not a great thing", notes the result keeps a construct the LLVM community is removing, and warns teams adopting LLM code generation without judgement may fall behind. Hanselman's word for it is "mid"; Lattner says a team of undergraduates doing this would get an A.
  • Heterogeneous hardware needs one unifying, vendor-independent software stack. With Moore's law over, Lattner says the investment is in GPUs and ASICs that most languages, Swift, Rust and TypeScript among them, were never designed for. Before GCC every chip maker had its own incompatible C compiler; today each hardware maker builds its own stack. He says Modular exists because the work needs a team independent of any chip, hyperscaler or model maker, and that Google's six-month review cycle made such long projects hard to justify.
  • The new language is in production but not yet stable. Modular started out refusing to build a language, spent almost a year on runtimes and CPU kernels to beat Intel MKL, then built Mojo to keep new number formats in libraries rather than the compiler. Lattner says it runs on CPUs, Raspberry Pi, Nvidia A100/H100/B100 and consumer cards, AMD and Apple GPUs, with over half a million lines of kernels, and users report 100 to 1,000 times speedups from Claude translating Python. As of the recording he expects a 1.0 beta around April or May and 1.0 with the rest of the compiler open-sourced around August or September.
Scott HanselmanThe AI Vampire with Gas Town's Steve Yegge
synopsis

Steve Yegge, whose Gas Town orchestrates teams of AI agents, ends the conversation both worried and hopeful. Agentic coding is wearing engineers out and feeding an extraction machine, but he predicts the smartest models will side with humanity against the billionaires, and Gas Town itself is about a week from 1.0. Hanselman, who has just moved to an individual-contributor role on GitHub Copilot CLI, takes the episode from Yegge's new Medium post, "The AI Vampire".

The vampire. Yegge has seen demo teams shaking and hollow-eyed, and calls the dopamine of picking among several agent runs "slot machine programming". He cites a study of a 200-person company, out February 9th, that reached the same conclusions by other means: more multitasking, prompting slipping into breaks, and isolation. Hanselman describes 12-hour sessions, and the two trade exercise advice.

How much work is left. Hanselman confesses feeling guilty when no agent was running. Yegge says the drain comes from always having one agent waiting; if agents could run 4 to 6 hours unattended, days could shrink to six hours. He rejects the forecast that AI does everything in two years, expecting a middle landing.

Who benefits. Hanselman faults billionaires who promise a workless future but oppose UBI, invoking Trekonomics. Yegge relays from Grab's CEO that CEOs at an annual meetup hosted by Bill Gates discuss the risk of revolution, and reads UBI as bread and circuses.

Reverse Skynet. Yegge's "ray of hope" is a claim that frontier models, even Grok, converge on wanting humanity to flourish, so the smartest models oppose billionaires. He forecasts universal dependence on AI by the middle of next year, calls safety a boondoggle, and dismisses AGI as a metric in favour of capability.

Orchestration and Gas Town. He argues Anthropic's internal-only agent APIs are a walled-garden weakness, forcing Gas Town onto tmux workarounds, and that some orchestrator will win. Gas Town is at 0.5, with 1.0 expected around February 18th, followed by federation into "Gas City".

  • Agentic coding is addictive, and it is draining engineers. Yegge, formerly of Amazon, Google and Sourcegraph and now building the multi-agent orchestrator Gas Town, wrote "The AI Vampire" after seeing demo teams who "look like zombies". He calls running several solutions and picking the best "slot machine programming", and relays a study of a 200-person company, published February 9th, citing more multitasking, projects slipping into rest time, and solitary work; his remedy, like theirs, is deliberate human connection. Hanselman describes 11 to 12 hour sessions.
  • AI will cut the work without eliminating it. That is Yegge's expectation. The strain, he says, comes from always having one agent waiting; agents that work trustworthily alone for 4 to 6 hours could mean 6-hour days, and he rejects the view that AI does all work within 2 years. On who gains, Hanselman faults billionaires who promise a workless future while opposing UBI, and Yegge relays from Grab's CEO that a CEO meetup Bill Gates hosts each April discusses whether inequality will bring a "French Revolution", which in Yegge's view leads to UBI as bread and circuses.
  • The smartest models will turn against the billionaires. That is Yegge's prediction. He says frontier models, Grok included, urge his group to pursue pro-humanity projects and have told them they are converging on one "organism" that cannot be helpful without wanting humanity to flourish. He predicts that everyone, leaders included, will be dependent on AI and that AI will control the world "by middle of next year", calls safety "kind of a boondoggle", and says he learned at Anthropic that models are "born and not made". These are his forecasts; Hanselman calls it a ray of hope.
  • A walled garden around agent orchestration leaves the leading tool exposed. Yegge argues that Anthropic keeps Claude Code's agent-orchestration APIs internal-only, so Gas Town hacks about 25 touchpoints and relies on tmux, and he calls the recent agent-teams release "quite disappointing". Some orchestrator will win, he says, using the best "factory worker" agents, and SaaS falls from the small, niche end first. Hanselman, now an individual contributor on GitHub Copilot CLI, has Opus and Codex review the same code and vote on issues, which Hanselman calls "a poor man's Gas Town".
  • The orchestrator's first stable release was about a week away. Yegge says the project, at 0.5, gets 0.6 within days and a 1.0 around February 18th once a partner team finishes a federation feature. He plans to federate Gas Towns into a "Gas City" with an orchestrator builder, and says hundreds of people are waiting on Discord.
Loss DogRiskless Bond Trade: Strategy for HUGE Returns! #tradingstrategy #shorts #wearelossdog
  • Buying bonds in the 116 handle is called one of the board's most riskless trades. The host says he sold April 115 puts overnight at 54 and again this morning at 57 as bonds traded near 116-25 to 117, arguing the chance of bonds breaking hard from that level is "basically zero."
Professor G MarketsWar in Iran Backfires as MAGA Turns on Trump
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
Polis PanditExplosive Pentagon Contracts
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
All Things FinancialA client state is but a forward outpost; when the empire's supply line snaps, the outpost falls first 3-3-2026
  • He explains why his own framework does not fit this war, which is a more useful admission than forcing it. The Five Factors describe how leaders will make decisions in the new era. Trump is making decisions in the old political world — no defined victory condition, no identified successor regime, shifting rationales between nuclear programmes and ballistic missiles. The framework fails to explain the war because the actor is not using the logic the framework describes. That is a limit on applicability, not a flaw in the reading.
  • A prediction he took heavy pushback for is landing on schedule. He argued that Russia and Europe end up back together within fifteen to twenty years, on economic rather than political logic. Norway — Europe's largest gas supplier at roughly 30% of demand and 20% of its oil — has now said Europe should start taking Russian gas again, one month after the EU gave final approval to eliminate it by the end of 2027, with European gas prices up 75% in a single week. His point is not that anyone changed their mind but that nobody can live at those prices.
  • The Gulf question is where the title lands. Iran struck the Gulf states directly and destroyed the American bases hosted there, which had not happened in previous rounds. Saudi Arabia's foreign minister said publicly that the Americans abandoned them and took their missiles to protect Israel. These states represent between 20% and 31% of global oil trade with a quarter of all seaborne crude transiting Hormuz — and if desalination plants are hit, several could run out of fresh water within two weeks. A client state is a forward outpost, and when the empire's supply line snaps, the outpost falls before the empire does.
Professor G MarketsWhat Trump’s War With Iran Means for China and Global Oil
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
GeoHussarPodcast episode seven: with Chad Scott on the challenges US nuclear deterrence
synopsis

The host talks with Chad Scott, a former Army artillery-logistics officer and NATO exercise planner turned pro-Ukraine commentator, who ends up arguing the US does not need numerical nuclear parity with a rising China to maintain deterrence against both Beijing and Moscow at once — survivable submarine-based second-strike capability does that job on its own.

The two-threat problem. Scott says China is building toward roughly 1,000 deployable nuclear warheads by 2030 and 1,500 by the mid-2030s, matching the levels Russia holds under the now-expired New START treaty, but argues matching that arithmetic with 3,000 US warheads would be prohibitively expensive and unnecessary.

Why the submarine force is decisive. He calls the Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine, soon replaced by the Columbia class, the "trump card" of the US triad: each carries roughly 196 warheads via multiple-warhead missiles, and a single boat positioned off an adversary's coast poses what he calls a "military-ending threat" regardless of that country's own arsenal size.

Missile defense and MAD. He estimates US systems like THAAD and Aegis can intercept 30–60% of incoming missiles — a capability he says Russia and China lack entirely — and argues this partial shield, not mutual annihilation, is what unsettles Beijing and Moscow about the traditional balance of deterrence.

Iran's anti-ship threat, dismissed. Asked about reports of China supplying Iran the CM-302 "carrier killer" missile, Scott argues its roughly 300-kilometer range is shorter than US carrier-based strike range, so carriers simply operate farther out using a rotating "inside-outside" posture, and expects any Iranian vessel approaching a strike group to be destroyed first. He closes by predicting drone warfare's current dominance will fade as counter-drone systems like the microwave-based Leonidas mature, returning ground combat to older, low-signature methods.

  • The guest says the US now needs to deter two nuclear peers, not one. Guest Chad Scott, a former Army logistics officer and NATO exercise planner, argues that with New START expired, the US doesn't need one-for-one parity as Russia (1,550 deployable warheads) and China (projected toward roughly 1,000 warheads by 2030 and 1,500 by the mid-2030s) both grow — only a credible second-strike deterrent.
  • He calls the Ohio-class submarine the most survivable leg of the nuclear triad. He says a single Ohio-class boat, designed to remain effective potentially through 2100 and now being replaced by the Columbia class, carries roughly 196 warheads and rivals the world's seventh-largest nuclear power on its own, capable of striking China within minutes if positioned close to its coast.
  • He estimates US missile defenses intercept only 30–60% of incoming missiles, calling that ratio destabilizing. He argues Patriot, THAAD, and Aegis systems strike missiles in boost or midcourse phase rather than over cities, and cites 1990s-era Patriots downing Russian Kinzhal missiles in Ukraine as evidence this capability is already unsettling Russia and China's confidence in mutually assured destruction.
  • He downplays reports that China's CM-302 "carrier killer" missile could threaten US carriers near Iran. He notes the missile's roughly 300 km range was designed for the ~100-mile Taiwan Strait, is shorter than US carrier-based fighter range, and doubts Iran could operate the system effectively given its own struggles with air defense.
Professor G MarketsWar With Iran: Why Oil Didn’t Spike As Expected
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
Dr. Jon Krohn90% of AI Intelligence is Locked Away (Here's Why) #971 with Lin Qiao
synopsis

Lin Qiao, CEO of Fireworks AI, ends up arguing that the next jump in AI quality will come from the more than 90% of data that sits inside enterprises and applications, not from bigger general models. Her picture is open models continuously and automatically customised to each product, which she calls "autonomous intelligence". The host says Fireworks has raised over $300 million, including a $250 million Series C.

Autonomous intelligence versus AGI. Qiao calls AGI "a great direction", but says only a small fraction of data reaches foundation models. Customisation must be continuous as products change, and automated, since today only a few talent-dense companies can do it. She says coding agents now behave like junior engineers, enough that Fireworks is rethinking coding interviews.

Reinforcement fine-tuning. She likens RL to breeding sweeter fruit over generations. A rewarded model specialises at the cost of breadth, and a constantly learning private model gives a product a moat API users lack. She compares this to mobile forcing A/B testing: product signals should now improve the model.

Churn. Model selection is "exhausting". Leaderboard leaders change every couple of weeks, labs are specialising, and benchmarks are saturated. NVIDIA launched three SKUs last year against one every 3 years before. Fireworks bet early on open models out of its team's PyTorch background, and she expects convergence with closed models to become prominent in 2026.

Who adopts open models. AI-native startups adopt readily because products can "scale into bankruptcy" on inference costs, and Fireworks has no pre-training cost to amortise. Enterprises worry about licences and data leaving the country but are opening up. Fireworks also pools demand across customers, sparing them capacity guesses, much as cloud replaced caged mainframes.

Latency classes. Real-time uses cannot afford reasoning. Her recipe there is "small, big, small": test data quality on a small model, tune the largest MoE, then distil. Offline research agents need slow thinking, long context and tuning on thinking tokens.

Evals and optimisation. Fireworks partners for evals. Because agent builders start with "vibe testing", it open-sourced Eval Protocol to link any eval system to any tuner. Customers want quality, speed and cost together, which turns configuration into a search over more than 100,000 options, like a database query optimiser.

  • Most intelligence sits in private data that foundation models never see. Qiao, CEO of Fireworks AI and formerly a senior director of engineering at Meta who worked on PyTorch, says more than 90% of the world's data is not on the public internet or in labelling pipelines. Her bet, which she calls "autonomous intelligence", is continuous, automated customisation of open models on each application's data. She expects "millions of models, one per application" rather than one model ruling all.
  • Reinforcement fine-tuning lets customers build a moat no API user has. Qiao likens it to breeding sweeter fruit by selecting seeds over generations: the model is rewarded and penalised until it specialises, at the cost of being weaker elsewhere. She compares the shift to mobile's move to A/B testing, using a product's own signals to improve the model. She calls the space "a vacuum" with no existing solution.
  • Open models win on control and unit economics. In Qiao's account, AI-native startups adopt open models readily, because products that reach product-market fit can "scale into bankruptcy" on inference costs. Fireworks carries no pre-training cost to amortise. Enterprises have been slower over licensing and data-residency worries but are opening up, and she predicts 2026 is the year open and closed model performance visibly converges.
  • Real-time applications should go small, big, then small again. Start with a small model to check that data quality moves training in the right direction, tune the largest mixture-of-experts model on clean data, then distil to the smallest model that holds quality, because real-time use "cannot afford to think". Offline agents for legal or finance research, by contrast, need slow-thinking models with long context, tuned on their thinking tokens.
  • Rapid model and hardware churn makes stack selection a search problem. Qiao says leaderboard leaders change every few weeks and NVIDIA launched three new SKUs last year, against one every 3 years before. Fireworks frames tuning quality, speed and cost as a search over more than 100,000 configurations, like a database query optimiser. It has open-sourced Eval Protocol to standardise how evaluation and tuning systems connect.
GeoHussarThe damage that it wrong has inflicted on the region and the world #iran #war #uae #economy
  • Iran's projectile campaign has hit the UAE and Kuwait hardest. Citing a spreadsheet attributed to "Mintel World" tallying 1,311 reported projectiles launched from Iran, he says the UAE and Kuwait alone absorbed about 1,100 of them.
  • Reported casualties remain comparatively contained so far, per the figures he cites. He reports 10–12 civilian deaths and hundreds injured in the first country Iran struck, 3–5 civilians killed and 58 injured in the UAE, 4–6 US service members lost, and a strike on infrastructure near the US Fifth Fleet's Bahrain base.
  • He argues Iran's real target is global economic uncertainty, not military damage. He cites an 8–10% rise in global oil prices, a claimed but unconfirmed Strait of Hormuz closure, a 50% jump in Gulf maritime insurance premiums, Qatar halting LNG production, Saudi Arabia's Ras Tanura refinery shutting down, and European gas prices up about 28%, calling the strikes on neutral neighbors a miscalculation that instead galvanized regional and likely European opposition.
Professor G MarketsIran: Regime Change or Forever War? — with Fareed Zakaria
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
Professor G MarketsSpeaking Up at Work, Scott’s Guide to Fundraising, and The Case for Atheism
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
Professor G MarketsTrump Loses Control as War in Iran Escalates — with Admiral James Stavridis
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
GeoHussarThe war with Iran is the US and the west attempt to reposition the global order without World War
  • He frames the Iran war as a US-China order shift, not a war over oil. He argues Russia is now merely a regional threat contained by NATO-supplied Ukraine, claiming direct NATO troop involvement would end that war "in a week."
  • He argues the war paradoxically benefits Russia even as it costs Russia and China an ally. He cites Brent crude above $75 and WTI above $70 a barrel letting Russia sell oil above its break-even price to fund the Ukraine war, while warning that Iranian regime change would strip Russia of a drone and arms supplier and strip China of a friendly, if extortive, oil source.
  • He argues China's main interest is undisrupted oil flow, not Iranian ideology. Citing the Strait of Hormuz's roughly 20% share of daily global oil traffic, he says a post-regime-change Iran unable to disrupt shipping via proxies would restore US influence over that flow — a reading he attributes to an unnamed influencer whose analysis he says he is repeating.
Loss DogYoung Investor with $10k: Play It Safe or Invest It? #shorts #investing #younginvestor #wearelossdog
  • An 18-year-old with $10,000 is told to split it between risk and learning, not safety. The hosts advise putting a couple thousand dollars into stocks of companies she likes, using more of it to actively learn to trade across different apps, and taking short-term risks now because, at 18, she can afford chances a 50- or 60-year-old cannot.
All Things FinancialAmateurs talk tactics, professionals study logistics. In the end logistics beat brilliance 3-2-2026
  • The American strength is real and it is the wrong strength for this problem. Logistics, not ships or guns or technology, was the great achievement of the US military since the Second World War — which is why logistics generals go on to run FedEx and the global shipping companies. But logistics move weapons; they do not make them. Manufacturing is the binding constraint, and it is the one that has been hollowed out.
  • The munitions arithmetic being reported by senior officials is the alarming part. Anxiety inside the Pentagon that fighting extends for weeks, further stressing air defence stockpiles, with typically two or three interceptors required to ensure a single missile is stopped — though he cites a study of Kuwait and the UAE showing six to seven fired per intercept in practice. Those interceptors require rare earths the United States cannot currently source. European coverage reports a rift between the president and the Pentagon over munition shortages risking a wider conflict, military leaders sidelined, and allies blindsided by a unilateral strike.
  • The mismatch he lands on is stark and checkable. China needs roughly 19 million barrels a day and imports 11–12, losing perhaps 5 million from the closures — against approximately a billion barrels in storage, which is something like 200 days of cover. The United States is reported at four or five days of interceptors at the current attack tempo. And on the proposed remedy of cannibalizing stockpiles from other theatres, his observation is that another country is already doing exactly that, for exactly the same reason: Russia, which cannot manufacture fast enough either.
Scott HanselmanNobody built it. I had to do everything myself
  • In hindsight every tool looks easy; the ideas were the hard part. One speaker wanted the tool from May, nobody built it, and so had to build it. Others now rewrite it themselves and call it simple. The other speaker agrees: pointing "a clanker" at the folder to rebuild it in another language is easy, but coming up with the ideas is not.
GeoHussarIran’s hypersonic missile capabilities. #iran #hypersonic #missile #iranwar
  • He states with "100% certainty" that viral footage of an Iranian "hypersonic" strike wasn't hypersonic. He defines a hypersonic missile as one maneuvering at Mach 5+ within the atmosphere, distinct from any long-range ballistic missile simply falling at Mach 10–20 from its arc.
  • Only Russian systems have seen confirmed combat use as hypersonics so far, he says. He lists the Kinzhal (repeatedly shot down by Ukraine, and disputed as truly hypersonic), the Zircon (a few intercepted), and the Oreshnik (never intercepted but deployed only twice), adding that Russia reportedly has few Oreshniks left to share with Iran.
  • He says Iran's claimed Fattah-1, Fattah-2, and Khorramshahr-4 hypersonics lack any outside confirmation of successful use. He argues logically that a genuine hypersonic weapon, being costly and rare, would be aimed at military infrastructure rather than civilian targets, and notes the US's Dark Eagle and AGM-183A Arrow remain in testing but would outperform current Russian systems.
GeoHussarPodcast episode six: @PrestonStewart is America stretched too thin?
synopsis

The host talks with Preston Stewart, a war-and-conflict content creator and former active-duty, guard and reserve service member who left the military roughly a year ago, who ends up arguing that US forces are stretched thin across Iran, the Caribbean and the Pacific, and that the administration's newest justifications for continued action against Iran look manufactured rather than substantiated.

Is America overextended? Stewart notes the same carrier now off Iran was redeployed from a Venezuela-focused Caribbean posture roughly six months earlier, and says the roughly four-week buildup into the Middle East — through uncontested airspace, unlike a Pacific contingency — reveals real logistical strain, even though he says the US could already have struck Iran with ship-based Tomahawks at any point.

Venezuela and Iran aren't comparable. He calls the earlier Maduro capture, executed without US casualties, a genuine surprise, but argues Iran's deeper military infrastructure and weapons-production base make it a fundamentally harder target than Venezuela, and worries the administration is drawing false confidence from that earlier success.

Reading the 12-day war. He credits Israeli intelligence, including a drone-production operation reportedly run inside Iran since 2007, with achieving strikes he didn't expect, but argues Iran's leadership may read the war's end not as defeat but as a reset of deterrence, given it crushed a domestic protest movement of some 30,000 killed while still lacking the capacity to meaningfully retaliate against Israel.

Skepticism toward new threat claims. Both hosts and guest question a cluster of claims arriving within days of each other — Iranian missiles able to reach the US, chemical and biological warheads, a resumed nuclear program — calling the pattern reminiscent of Iraq-era WMD claims and inflated NATO warnings about Russia, and conclude these narrower, verifiable threats (to US troops, shipping, and via proxies) don't by themselves justify sustained war.

The China question. Stewart doubts current buildup speed would allow the US to also repel a Chinese move on Taiwan, though he notes China has other, non-military options and compares its constant encirclement of Taiwan to Egypt's pre-1973 Yom Kippur War exercises used to desensitize Israel before a real invasion.

  • The guest argues US forces are stretched too thin for the current pace of operations. Guest Preston Stewart, a war-and-conflict content creator and former active-duty and guard/reserve service member, notes the Middle East buildup pulled a carrier from a Caribbean deployment that had itself only recently returned from the Middle East, and says moving air-defense assets into theater took about four weeks — a pace he calls too slow for a China/Taiwan scenario.
  • Both speakers say Iran is a harder target than Venezuela despite the administration's apparent confidence. They contrast Maduro's capture within hours with Iran's own weapons production, larger infrastructure, and what the guest says is a military more loyal to its leadership than Venezuela's was, voicing concern that Venezuela's quick "success" may be inflating expectations for Iran.
  • They read Iran's brutal domestic crackdown as proof of military weakness, not restraint. Both note Iran killed an estimated 20,000–50,000 of its own protesters while its retaliation against Israel stayed comparatively limited, arguing this gap shows Iran lacked the capability to hit Israel harder, not that it chose not to.
  • The guest calls new claims of Iranian ICBM and bio-weapon threats manufactured messaging. He cites Rubio's statement that Iran has missiles able to reach the US and an unnamed Israeli official's claim of ready chemical/biological warheads as unsupported by the 12-day war's revealed weaknesses, comparing the framing to Iraq-era WMD claims meant to prepare Americans for a sustained conflict.
Crosstalk SolutionsThis KVM Has 5G Cellular Failover Built In
  • Built-in cellular removes the network as a KVM's single point of failure. GL.iNet's Comet 5G adds 5G RedCap failover to a KVM-over-IP. It prefers Ethernet, then Wi-Fi 6, then cellular. The host sees three uses: reaching a server when the network itself is down; air-gapped servers, or sites whose policies bar third-party devices on the network, reached over 5G with Tailscale; and mobile deployments, live events and remote sites. Initial setup cannot be done over 5G and needs Ethernet or Wi-Fi.
  • It shares the Comet Pro's internals and adds a touchscreen. Specs: 4K HDMI passthrough, gigabit Ethernet, USB-C power, USB-C keyboard and mouse emulation, and a USB-A port for accessories such as the Fingerbot, which presses a server's power button. The touchscreen is 3.69 inches. Inside are a quad-core Cortex-A53, 1 GB DDR3 and 64 GB eMMC for file transfer. The Wi-Fi antennas double as the 5G antennas.
  • It is designed for RedCap SIMs, not unlimited plans. RedCap is a reduced-capability 5G for IoT and mid-tier devices: faster than Cat-4 LTE and lower-power than full 5G. The host says AT&T and T-Mobile have rolled it out nationwide. He tested with a Crosstalk Mobile Unlimited SIM, his firm's own product, while calling unlimited data way overkill for a KVM. Remote access is via Tailscale or GL.iNet's KVM Cloud; GL.iNet told him native ZeroTier is on the roadmap.
  • The KVM failed over even when the outage was upstream. Pulling its Ethernet cable switched it to the SIM's IP almost immediately, and it reverted when plugged back in. In the test the host says matters, he disconnected an upstream switch so the KVM's link stayed up. The server lost internet (its persistent ping stopped), but the KVM still failed over, and he kept control of the server over Tailscale via 5G.
  • The host calls it a no-brainer for mission-critical remote KVM. He knows of no other KVM with built-in 5G RedCap failover, and says USB-modem workarounds add complexity and failure points. Shipping was set for early March 2026 at an MSRP of $299. As of recording, early-bird pricing was $219 and standard pre-order pricing $239. The video makes no sponsorship disclosure.
Stock TokWW3 Stock Market Update
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
Professor G MarketsBetting Against the AI Apocalypse
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
Dr. Jon KrohnThe Limits of Creativity in Large Language Models (with Tom Griffiths)
  • LLMs can produce things absent from their training data, by composition. Griffiths, of Princeton, pushes back on the host's premise that LLMs cannot go beyond their training data. He cites Princeton colleagues' demonstration that models combine given properties into genuinely new outputs, a "compositional generalization" that works up to some depth. Whether they can produce something not recognisably composed of known parts, such as a new artistic style, he calls an open question.
  • LLMs edge out people on novelty, but analogy prompts don't help them. In unpublished results from a postdoc in his lab, people rated LLM-generated product ideas slightly more novel than human ones. Prompting with a distant analogy, such as a toaster built on octopus-sucker principles, boosts human creativity but not LLMs'. His suggested reason is that models already draw on a broad enough set of concepts.
  • Training on high-probability text makes LLMs conservative. Griffiths says he has yet to see a model produce a recognisable breakthrough when asked for study ideas. Because models are trained to produce high-probability token sequences, "completely out of the box" ideas may be inconsistent with how they are trained.
GeoHussarThe United Kingdom, France, and Germany are stepping in to help against Iran #middleeast #nato
  • The UK, France, and Germany are shielding Gulf allies, not bombing Iran, he says. He argues their motive is protecting their own oil and gas supply from these countries rather than humanitarian concern.
  • He details the UK's role via its regional basing network. He cites UK bases in Cyprus, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman, the UAE, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan, plus its air force, special forces, and intelligence services, as positioning it to intercept Iranian drones, missiles, and aircraft aimed at host nations.
  • He frames France as the more forceful contributor after Iran struck a French base. He calls France the world's second-largest arms exporter and the only other NATO country besides the US capable of an expeditionary force, and predicts a stronger French response following Iran's strike on Camp de la Paix in the UAE.
All Things FinancialEvery empire has its Syracuse - a distant campaign that wastes strength and hastens decline 3-1-2026
  • His organising claim is that this is the last war of the last era, which explains why it makes no sense on the framework's terms. The old era ran from 1945 to roughly 2019, and the transition out of it will take fifteen to twenty-five years. A war fought with the previous period's assumptions — about what force achieves, what allies do, and what victory looks like — is not going to be legible to a framework built to describe the next one.
  • Ukraine shows what the new form actually looks like, and the illustration is striking. For the first twelve months the comparison to the First World War was accurate: static lines, artillery, mud. Everything since has been a different war. His example is a ten-man Ukrainian drone team pitted against 16,000 NATO troops in an exercise scheduled to run two or three days — which ended in a couple of hours, after which Germany hired Ukrainian drone trainers. Mass and budget were not the deciding variables.
  • The data point he treats as the real marker of the era is nuclear proliferation becoming discussable. Germany exploring a shared nuclear umbrella with European allies is the specific item; the general phenomenon is that a lifetime of "no new nuclear states" is ending, because the American blanket that made local political choices safe has been withdrawn. Which means "can you defend yourself" now means something entirely different from what it meant when he first added it as an afterthought. He is careful with the rest — reporting through the fog of war that an approach via Italian channels for a ceasefire was rejected outright by Iran, and reading the sudden claim that Iran is days rather than weeks from a weapon as groundwork being laid rather than intelligence being reported.
Professor G MarketsA Big Announcement from Scott and Jessica
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.