Souk's Notes - Unofficial Summaries

Unofficial, machine-generated summaries, as of 2026-11-09.

Dr. Jon Krohn1011: The Real AI Frontier Isn't Smarter Machines (with Catherine Williams)
synopsis

Catherine Williams, chief data officer at the nonprofit Candid and a data scientist since 2012, ends on a single piece of advice for the LLM era: keep building your own mental models while you hand work to machines. Deep technical understanding still matters even when AI does the math, she argues, because it is what lets a person reason at the next level up. The frontier she finds most interesting is not smarter machines but the interface where machines help human thinking.

From black holes to mental models. Williams was a pen-and-paper mathematician working on spherically symmetric black hole spacetimes. Her thesis showed that, under reasonable assumptions, a quasi-local characterisation of a black hole's boundary coincides asymptotically with Penrose's event horizon. She took two habits from that work into industry. One is fearlessness about going deep into hard material. The other is deliberately building a mental model of each business, checked by repeating it back to colleagues. The habit she had to unlearn was bottom-up thinking: needing every detail before trusting the big picture works for a math PhD, she says, and wastes time in business.

Does math still matter? The host notes that engineering has displaced math as the field's core skill, and that programming and math are exactly what LLMs do best. Williams answers with a hierarchy of complexity. As machines absorb one layer, people move to the layer above, but they still need fluency in the layers below, as children learn arithmetic despite calculators. The best professionals will move up and down the stack rather than specialise. She sees the interface between machine and human thinking as an underexplored frontier and uses LLMs to sharpen her own models. A career that tracked the field. AppNexus hired her in 2012 for probability math, despite her lack of data skills, because its bidding data was stored in aggregate and modelled with Bayesian methods. Once Hadoop exposed log-level data, her team taught itself logistic regression and random forests from papers and conferences. She later became marketplace czar, treating buy and sell sides as coupled rather than zero-sum and building a joint revenue forecast. After AT&T bought the company and it became Xandr, she moved to Qualtrics. There she built a machine-learning function just as BERT arrived, and embeddings swept aside the keyword and rule-based text analysis.

Fine-tuning and cost. Both agree that fine-tuning open models to beat off-the-shelf ones has largely gone the way of the dinosaur. Williams expects LLMs' true costs to come due and spark a new wave of creativity. The host counters with his own claim that a fixed level of capability has fallen to about 1% of its cost within two years. She agrees, saying that cost pressure, through distillation and cheaper ways to run frontier models, is the creativity she means.

Candid. Candid formed about six years ago when Foundation Center and GuideStar merged, and it supplies data on nonprofits, foundations and grants. For the first time in her career the data is not instrumented by her own organisation; it comes largely from IRS forms and self-filled profiles, so cleaning and extracting meaning are the core job. The organisation moved from printed books to CDs to SaaS, and now offers an MCP connector, built with Anthropic, that serves its data inside tools like Claude. Advice. To aspiring leaders she says to learn the problems one level above your own: that is what got her into the rooms where decisions were made. For the future she claims no crystal ball, only the rule to grow along with the tools rather than outsource to them.

  • Deep math still matters even when machines do the math. Williams argues knowledge is a hierarchy of layers, and as AI takes over one layer practitioners move up to the next, but still need fluency in the layers below, as children still learn arithmetic despite calculators. The best data professionals, she says, will move up and down that stack rather than specialise in one slice.
  • The real frontier is the machine-to-human interface, not smarter machines. Against the billions raised for world models, she says the more interesting problem is using LLMs to improve one's own mental models. Her advice for the LLM era is to keep building those models while delegating to agents: "Don't outsource. Grow along with."
  • A math PhD's habits help, except the bottom-up instinct. She credits the PhD with fearlessness about hard technical material and with the habit of deliberately building a mental model of each business's data flows, but says she had to unlearn needing every detail before trusting the big picture. Her leadership advice is to understand the problems and constraints one level above your own role.
  • Each data-science era was wiped out by the next. She was hired at AppNexus in 2012 for probability math on aggregated bidding data, moved to logistic regression and random forests once Hadoop exposed log-level data, and at Qualtrics saw embeddings blow away keyword and rules-based text analysis. Fine-tuning has largely gone "the way of the dinosaur" to zero-shot models, but she expects pressure to cut LLM costs, once their true bill comes due, to drive a new wave of creativity in distillation and cost optimisation.
  • Candid's hardest data problem is data it did not instrument. The nonprofit, formed about six years ago by merging Foundation Center and GuideStar, draws largely on IRS forms and self-reported profiles, so cleaning and interpretation matter more than in her earlier roles. Its MCP connector, launched with Anthropic, puts that data directly inside AI tools like Claude.
Professor G MarketsThe World Now Views China More Favorably Than the U.S. — with Selina Xu
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
AI Analyst LabWe're partnering with Moonshot AI — open-source AI analytics with Kimi K3
  • The lab argues open-source models are where AI analytics is headed. The speaker announces a partnership between the lab and Moonshot AI, maker of Kimi, and says Kimi K3, released "last week", is the largest open model ever, ahead of GPT 5.5, Opus and other open models on published benchmarks, ahead of every model tested including Fable on some agentic work such as long-horizon coding, and about half the cost of frontier closed models. These benchmark and cost figures are the speaker's claims as of recording. The pitch is for a free session, lesson four of the 15-lesson "Build Your AI Analyst" series, that tests Kimi and other open models head to head against Claude on quality, cost and speed.
Professor G MarketsDoes AOC Have the Rizz that Trump Used to Build MAGA?
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
AI Analyst LabThe Analysis Graveyard — where most analysis goes to die
  • Most analysis dies by being ignored, not by being wrong. The speaker names three ways it happens: pulling data before knowing which decision it serves, measuring everything (47 metrics, a dashboard for every team, refreshed daily, none forcing a decision), and "let's take this offline" with no owner, date or decision. Their fix is three questions before starting: what result would make us act, who acts, and when. If those can't be answered, do no analysis yet. They argue this matters more now because AI has made getting the answer the easy part, which leaves asking the right question and landing the decision as the scarce work.
All Things FinancialWorldMonitor.app - global information for the physical world - The Five Factors 7-20-2026
  • A tool recommendation rather than an analysis: worldmonitor.app as a live map of physical-world infrastructure. Built by an individual who found Middle East war reporting inadequate, it layers undersea cables, pipelines, every aircraft in the air, fires, nuclear incidents, conflict hotspots, and clickable public cameras, with a 3D view still in beta. Free tier, then roughly $39.99 and $249.99 paid levels plus custom, and pitched at commodity and stock trading. He discloses no stake, notes visible data gaps and that the time-window filters are not yet working.
  • Its relevance is that it renders exactly what the Five Factor framework depends on. His stated method is aggregating physical-world data and flattening it so decisions can be made against it — "out of the political world into the physical world" — and this is that plumbing in one place. He says he is considering reaching out to the developer and asks viewers to report back on whether it proves useful.
  • He frames it against a China–US AI development he finds indefensible. China offered its AI models free to a BRICS-plus grouping representing three and a half to four billion people, together with 5,000 training slots; the next day OpenAI's CEO called for a US regulatory fence to avoid competing with cheaper Chinese models he concedes may now be better. His response is open bafflement, and an explicit objection to any bailout of their equity.
Loss DogStop Trading: Know When to Park Your Symbol! #tradingstrategy #wearelossdog #trading #market
  • A symbol can earn a personal trading ban independent of its P&L. One host put Roku on his own "do not trade" list out of spite after it stopped supporting the show, acknowledging the ban only hurt himself, and cites Sears Roebuck as an older example.
  • Feeling "not in the zone" on a symbol is reason enough to step away from it. The other host says spinning your wheels without gaining or losing — pushing on a string — means it's time for a short timeout, since staying in while out of sync tends to hurt more than stepping back does.
Scott HanselmanDevelopers Want Elasticity, CFOs Want Predictability
  • FinOps reconciles developers' elasticity with CFOs' predictability. One speaker says the modern cloud sells to both sides, which cannot fully coexist. The other says their part of FinOps, rate optimization, commitments and upfront spend, sits at the interface of DevOps, infrastructure, the CIO or CTO's office and finance, which see things differently but share one goal: the best leverage on the dollar and the most predictability in a fundamentally unpredictable space.
Professor G MarketsThe Connection Economy: Why We're Paying a Premium to Be Together
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
Professor G MarketsFixing AI's Branding Problem + Advice for Anxious Public Speakers
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
Professor G MarketsOpenAI Is Spinning Out Of Sam Altman's Control
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
Polis PanditAmerica Trained China's New AI Star
  • Moonshot AI's Kimi K3, which just rattled U.S. markets, was built by a founder America trained. Zhilin Yang earned a PhD at Carnegie Mellon and researched at Google Brain and Meta AI before choosing to build his company in Beijing rather than accept recruitment from firms like Apple.
  • The U.S. talent pipeline has visibly reversed since Yang finished his PhD in 2019. International students once made up about 40% of U.S. STEM doctoral candidates, with roughly 90% of Chinese nationals earning STEM PhDs from 2000-2015 staying in the country; new student visas fell 35.6% between summer 2024 and summer 2025.
  • A DHS rule taking effect September 2026 shifts the burden onto foreign students. It ends the "duration of status" framework in place since 1978, replacing it with a fixed expiration date after which unlawful presence accrues automatically with no hearing — making an already-shrinking pipeline less attractive to the next Zhilin Yang.
Mohamed El-erianThe Weekly Look at the Global Economy and Markets
  • Escalating US-Iran tensions pushed Brent toward $90 a barrel just as new Fed Chair Warsh's first Congressional testimony coincided with softer June CPI and PPI data. He read the testimony as well received and substantive, but a further weekend escalation threatens the market assumption that such skirmishes stay contained, with a fresh energy-price surge unwelcome for central banks nearing what they hope is inflation's "last mile."
  • Tech-sector deleveraging that began in South Korea spread across markets, flipping the dynamic so that price action now drives the narrative rather than the reverse. Highly leveraged pooled vehicles acted as a catalyst for the wobble, and SpaceX's stock extended its post-IPO decline to end the week below its issuance price, feeding a shift from investor exuberance toward "show-me-the-money" skepticism over AI capex.
  • Global growth divergence widened, with the US economy staying resilient while Europe and China softened. Eurozone industrial production for May came in worse than expected, and China's annual growth slowed to 4.2% in the second quarter from 5.0% in the first, with consumption and non-state investment both flashing weak.
All Things FinancialThe Toll was never abolished
  • Free passage was never a right, only a discount extended while a navy made the alternative free — and Copenhagen 1857 is misread as its origin. Denmark abolished the 428-year Sound Dues for 33.5M rigsdaler (Britain paid ~£1.125M), but that abolished one toll on one strait; it was the Royal Navy, then the U.S. Navy, that kept every other strait free by making contesting it too expensive. This framing is flagged explicitly as a framework interpretation, not verified fact.
  • Turkey shows how fast a suspended toll can re-price: it waived ~75% of its Montreux gold-franc right for 39 years at $0.80/net ton, then a single 2022 presidential decree jumped it 5.1x to $4.08 — now $6.70 as of July 2026 (+14.9% YoY, 8.4x the pre-2022 rate), with revenue rising from $38M to an estimated $254M. No treaty or renegotiation was needed, just a decree — and because there's no alternative to the Bosphorus, Turkey faces no competitive discipline, unlike Suez, which is discounting post-Houthi since shippers can substitute the Cape of Good Hope.
  • Chancay, Peru is framed as toll consolidation, not avoidance: the Shanghai–Chancay Pacific route crosses zero chokepoints, but the real story is which of two feeder railroads is actually funded. The 120km Junín line ($420M PowerChina EPC contract) is under construction and feeds Chinalco's Toromocho mine (~250,000 t/yr, ~10% of Peru's copper) via a fully Chinese-owned chain — mine, rail, freehold port — bypassing the DP World/APM-operated Callao gateway; the speculative 4,500km Brazil bioceanic corridor remains just a feasibility memorandum.
  • War-risk insurance is described as the toll migrating from sovereigns to private underwriters, repricing weekly rather than by treaty. Hormuz war-risk premiums moved from 0.25% (Feb 2026) to 1–3% within a week after strikes (a single-source figure cites up to 10% of hull value in some cases); a $150M tanker's transit cost rose from roughly $375,000 to $1.5–4.5M with no change to the ship, cargo, or route — read as the U.S. Navy's free "insurance policy" being withdrawn and privatized in real time.
All Things FinancialChancay, Peru: a route with no chokepoints is worth more than the shortest route 7-19-2026
  • Straits were never free — tolling was suppressed only because a navy made enforcing a toll too expensive to bother with. The host cites Denmark's 428-year Sound Dues (bought out for ~£1.1M from Britain in the 1857 Copenhagen Treaty) as the model: it ended one toll, not tolling itself, since it was later Royal Navy and U.S. Navy dominance that kept every other strait open by default.
  • Turkey's Bosphorus toll shows how fast a suppressed toll can snap back once the deterrent weakens: unchanged near $0.80/net ton for 39 years, then a single 2022 presidential decree jumped it to $4.08, now around $6.07–6.70, turning a roughly $3,200 transit fee into about $25,000. By contrast, Trump's proposed 20% Hormuz "guardian" fee (cited around $35M/ship) was reportedly walked back within two days after pushback, illustrating that a toll needs no real alternative to be sustainable — Turkey has none, so it faces no pricing discipline, while the discounting Suez Canal (post-Houthi Bab-el-Mandeb disruption) does.
  • Chancay, Peru is framed as toll consolidation rather than toll avoidance: a Chinese-owned freehold port with zero maritime chokepoints between Shanghai and Chancay, fed by a $420M, 120km PowerChina railroad already under construction to Peruvian copper/polymetallic (cesium, lithium) deposits — while a proposed 4,500km line to Brazilian soy/iron/beef remains speculative. The host ties this to insurance costs also spiking (roughly $375,000 to $1.5–4.5M per transit) as the U.S. Navy's free protection recedes, arguing global shippers now face multiple simultaneous "toll booths" — chokepoint, rail, and insurance — to move goods.
Scott HanselmanFor text, Braille is identical to print
  • For text and numbers, braille equals print; for graphics it does not. The speaker says tactile graphics are a different and much less detailed experience, while studies find braille can be read as fast and remembered about as well as print. The practical rule offered: where the data is textual or numeric, keep it as text and numbers rather than baking it into visuals.
All Things FinancialAi is a promise built on negative cash flow. Revenue is vanity profit sanity free cash flow survival 7-17-26
  • The ROI question is still unanswered while the cost gap moves the wrong way. He opens on Ruth Porat's warning that pressing for return on investment forces teams into short-term tactical cost cuts rather than company-building, and agrees the return has not appeared. The same week, Kimi shipped as the leading frontier model — ahead of Claude's Fable 5 — a day after a US claim of a six-to-nine-month lead, and he notes OpenRouter pricing showing American models costing 20 to 50 times as much to run.
  • Equity is effectively off the table, so the debt is the entire question. With government equity participation in play and IPO prospects difficult — SpaceX bonds from its $100B raise already trading at 90, down 10% — he sets the equity story aside. What remains is roughly $660–680B of AI and data centre debt already outstanding plus another ~$660B contracted, about $1.1 trillion.
  • The tradeable distinction is ARD versus non-ARD paper, and it points the short in a specific direction. An anticipated repayment date is a soft maturity: 30-year paper with a five-year put, where the sponsor is economically compelled to refinance at year five or lose its distribution stream to a cash sweep and pay a higher coupon. So it prices off the five-year Treasury, a structure borrowed from aircraft ABS — long-lived assets, short investor duration, discipline enforced by cash flow rather than covenant, except chips last two years rather than thirty. Between September 2025 and May 2026 the hyperscaler corporate curve decompressed materially while the data centre ABS curve did not; Oracle paid 40–50bp more on an identical deal five months apart. His conclusion: buy the ABS, and short the non-ARD megadeals — $54B, $38B, $32B — rather than the ABS deals capped near $1.35B.
Scott HanselmanWho is left behind when AI moves fast? with Dr. Chinasa T. Okolo
synopsis

Okolo ends where she starts: optimistic but cautious, holding that humans control how AI is built and deployed, and that for the global majority the binding problems are money, electricity, connectivity, wages and autonomy rather than access to AI. Her one demand of big tech is genuine independence in how governance frameworks are written.

Policymakers. Most still equate AI with chatbots, she says, though governments have used predictive models for decades, and she predicts they will lack sufficient expertise for at least another decade, even in the US, because technical people have no incentive to enter government.

Explainability in the field. Her Cornell work with India's community health workers, studied in 2020 with fieldwork in 2022, found they did not know what AI was while under government pressure to adopt it, risking deference to a wrong output. Hanselman asks whether explanation creates agency for users who cannot refuse; she says workers usually still make the final call. The tools also leave them troubleshooting alone on mid-range phones and reading outputs "85% confident" instead of definitive scales. They are productive already, she says, but underpaid.

Research. She reports declining computer literacy and critical thinking among students who outsource literature work, doubts a Stanford lab's paper a week, and found her own work cited under a fake journal.

Where the money goes. Rejecting crypto-then-AI savior stories, she cites Nigerian budgets that never trickle down and health money spent on cars rather than beds. Pilots, in her ICTD experience, are abandoned after the study; durable deployments need cloud support, paid maintainers and return visits.

Sovereignty. She defines it as autonomy, including the power to say no, but says dependence on chips from China, Nvidia and ASML rules out full sovereignty, so alliances matter. She warns that Meta, Google and Microsoft helped fund Nigeria's AI strategy, and that big tech impeded Brazil's AI act. Her 2035 hope is modular shipping-container micro data centers from a Kenyan company, on renewable grids.

  • Policymakers' AI expertise will lag for at least a decade. Okolo, an AI governance and safety researcher and policy adviser with a Cornell computer science PhD, says most policymakers still equate AI with chatbots, though governments have used predictive models for decades. She predicts insufficient expertise for at least another decade even in countries like the US, because technical people lack financial, career and recognition incentives to enter government.
  • Explanation protects health workers from deferring to wrong AI output. In her dissertation work with India's community health workers (ASHAs), studied in 2020 with fieldwork in 2022, she found they did not know what AI was while under government pressure to adopt it. Pressed by Hanselman on whether explanation creates agency for users who cannot refuse, she says they usually still make the final call from experience; she adds that the tools burden them with troubleshooting alone on mid-range phones and with outputs "85% confident" in place of definitive scales, and that they are already productive but underpaid.
  • Outsourcing to chatbots erodes research skills and research itself. Okolo cites declining computer literacy reported on a professors' forum, lost critical thinking from handing literature search and synthesis to LLMs, and homogenized views that weaken empirical contributions. She doubts a Stanford lab producing a paper a week ("we don't need that much research"), and found her own work cited in a Czech undergraduate dissertation under a fake journal; Hanselman mentions Russinovich's RefChecker finding fabricated references getting worse.
  • The real problem is where the money goes, not AI access. Rejecting crypto-then-AI savior narratives, she cites Nigerian budgets that go to agencies without trickling down, corruption, and health money spent on hospital cars instead of beds and medicine; governments should fix electricity, connectivity and wages first. From ICTD research she says pilots are abandoned after the study, so lasting deployments need cloud support, paid maintainers and return visits.
  • Sovereignty means autonomy, including independence from big-tech-funded governance. She defines it as the power to say no and to build capacity, but says reliance on chips from China, Nvidia and ASML rules out full sovereignty, so alliances matter. She demands true independence in writing governance frameworks, noting Meta, Google and Microsoft helped fund Nigeria's national AI strategy and that big tech impeded Brazil's AI act; Hanselman, asking, discloses a day job at a big tech company. Her 2035 hope is modular, shipping-container micro data centers from a Kenyan company, on renewable-powered grids.
Professor G MarketsThe Week: The Cost of Being Young in America
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
Sosnoff On Money11 “Boring” Trading Strategies the top 1% of Retail Traders Use
  • Short naked puts are his single most-used trade, netting probabilities above 80%. He sells them 35–50 days to expiration at 16–22 delta, targeting a buying-power reduction of 20% of the strike and closing at 50% of the credit collected — his default approach across four decades of trading.
  • Short strangles plus a contrarian override drive over 70% of profits. Sold at 16–20 delta and 45 DTE with a 50%-of-credit profit target, he calls the short strangle his best-performing strategy in 45 years, provided position size stays small and implied volatility rank stays high.
  • The jade lizard is his favorite bullish trade after short puts. He combines a short put with a short call spread sized so the combined premium exceeds the spread's width, held around 40 days to expiration, citing recent uses in Nike, Uber, Netflix and crude oil.
  • Volatility contracts about twice as often as it expands, he says. That mean-reversion is why he prefers selling premium over buying it, and why he warns the common retail mistake is trading strangles too large or entering when implied volatility rank is already low.
Y CombinatorWorld Models, JEPA And The Path To Sample-Efficient RL
synopsis

Two AI researchers set out to explain why world models — systems that learn to predict how an environment changes in response to actions — are viewed as the most promising route to closing the gap between how efficiently humans learn and how inefficiently even frontier AI models learn, and they end by concluding that current world-model architectures are close in spirit to how brains work, but not yet close enough.

They open by defining sample efficiency as "intelligence per sample": how much smarter a system gets from one additional training example. Today's models, despite training on a compressed version of the internet, still fail tasks most humans solve intuitively, such as ARC-AGI puzzles. One researcher illustrates the opposite extreme — a perfectly sample-efficient system — with Newtonian mechanics: NASA can plan an asteroid intercept years in advance using a physical world model, with zero trial-and-error data collection, because gravity and motion are already known and differentiable.

Defining the framework. To ground the discussion, they walk through reinforcement-learning vocabulary using a drone-landing example: a state transition function (a "world model") predicts the next state given the current state and action; a policy decides what action to take; a value function estimates future reward. When an environment is deterministic and differentiable, as with drone physics, the optimal policy can be solved directly with convex optimization — the same principle used to land SpaceX rockets. Once another agent's unpredictable behavior enters the picture, the problem becomes stochastic and non-differentiable, forcing a shift to reinforcement learning.

Chess to Go to driving to robotics. They build a ladder of environments by state- and action-space size. Chess has an enormous state space but a small action space, which is why lookahead is tractable. Go's board is much larger, and AlphaGo/AlphaZero solved it with Monte Carlo Tree Search — roughly 800 simulated rollouts of up to 30 moves, or tens of thousands of model calls, per single move. A hypothetical 1,000-square Go board, they calculate, would need on the order of 60 million model calls per move, which is why AlphaGo-style planning "doesn't scale": it requires both a small, discrete action space and a perfectly deterministic environment. Self-driving cars break both assumptions — an effectively infinite state space, an action space they estimate around 36,000 discrete steering/pedal combinations, and other drivers making the environment non-differentiable. Humanoid robotics is worse still: a simple six-axis arm alone yields an action space "like 10 to the 16," teleoperation data is scarce and expensive, and a policy trained on one robot body often fails on a different one — the "cross-embodiment gap."

How world models fix this. They trace a lineage of solutions: Schmidhuber's 2018 "World Models" paper first showed a policy trained purely on a model's imagined, synthetic rollouts could still perform in a real environment; Danijar Hafner's Dreamer series extended this to Minecraft, becoming the first system to mine diamonds using policies trained almost entirely on imagined rollouts, with a small amount of real data added for "action conditioning." The current frontier, they argue, is starting from pretrained video-diffusion models and adding action conditioning with comparatively little real teleoperation data — citing Wayve's Gaia model and a robotics paper, Dream Zero, that reportedly needed only about 500 hours of teleoperation data. They also cite a University of Washington paper describing the cortex as literally performing this same joint estimation of sensory states and predicted action consequences, and a DeepMind weather model applying the same diffusion-based approach to forecasting.

JEPA and its collapse problem. They introduce joint embedding predictive architectures as a fix for the cost of predicting full video frames: an encoder compresses each frame into a latent representation, and the model predicts the next latent rather than the next image. Naively trained, this collapses to a trivial solution, so techniques like VICReg add regularization forcing predicted latents to stay spread out.

What's still missing. They close on open problems: physics-informed neural networks still fail outside their training distribution; models can't yet match a human's rapid mid-task adaptation, such as detecting a "dead spot" on a basketball court; and full simulated planning remains too slow for real-time use. Even so, they conclude the concept "passes the squint test" that autoregressive language models do not — with one caveat: sleep may implement a training step neither of them can yet explain.

  • Sample efficiency, not scale, is the biggest unsolved problem in AI. The researcher defines it as "intelligence per sample" and "intelligence per watt," noting today's models need vastly more data than humans to acquire new skills, and argues world models — learned simulators that predict how the world changes in response to actions — are the most promising path to closing that gap.
  • AlphaGo-style Monte Carlo tree search cannot scale to self-driving or robotics. He calculates that Go's roughly 361-move action space already requires tens of thousands of model calls per move; a self-driving car's action space is roughly 100 times larger and the environment isn't perfectly deterministic, so the same test-time planning becomes computationally infeasible.
  • Training world models on video lets policies learn from imagined rollouts, cheaply. Citing Jürgen Schmidhuber's original 2018 "World Models" paper and the Dreamer series, which learned to mine diamonds in Minecraft from imagined rollouts, he argues pairing pretrained video-diffusion models with a small amount of real action-conditioned data — as robotics project Dream Zero and self-driving startup Wayve's Gaia reportedly do — needs far less teleoperation data than raw imitation learning.
  • JEPA compresses prediction into latent space, but risks collapsing to trivial outputs. He explains that predicting raw future video frames is computationally wasteful, so joint embedding predictive architectures instead predict compressed representations of the next state — a trick that, without added regularization such as VICReg, can collapse into always outputting zero, a problem several current world-model papers are working to fix.
Professor G MarketsMike Novogratz: Crypto's Investors Have Moved On
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
Dr. Jon KrohnFable 5 as Advisor: Anthropic's Two-Model Pattern for Smarter, Cheaper Agents (Ep. 1010)
  • A cheap executor model can consult a frontier advisor mid-task. The host describes Anthropic's advisor tool, in beta on the Claude API since April: a fast model such as Sonnet or Haiku runs the whole agent loop and calls a stronger model such as Opus or Fable like any other tool. The call takes no parameters; Anthropic's servers hand the advisor the full transcript inside the same API request, and it returns typically 400 to 700 tokens of advice with its thinking stripped out.
  • Anthropic reports the pairing can raise quality while cutting cost. On its own April figures (the host flags them as the vendor's), Sonnet with an Opus advisor scored 2.7 points higher on SWE-bench Multilingual at 12% lower cost per task, because early guidance prevents failed attempts; Haiku with an Opus advisor went from about 20% to 41% on BrowseComp, still behind Sonnet alone but 85% cheaper. The weaker the executor, the bigger the lift.
  • Fable 5 advising Sonnet 5 closes most of the gap to Fable. In Anthropic's updated numbers on 482 SWE-bench Pro tasks, Sonnet 5 alone passed about 75% at 75 cents a task, rising to 84% at $1.40 with Fable 5 consulted about once per task; Fable 5 alone reached 92% at over $2, so the pairing got about 92% of Fable's performance at 63% of its cost.
  • The advisor suits long-horizon agents, not single-turn questions. Per Anthropic's documentation as the host relays it, executors under-call the advisor, so prompts should push for calls before committing to an approach and before declaring done; a mid-conversation nudge added roughly seven points on Haiku, nothing on Sonnet and slightly lowered Opus. A 2,048-token cap cut advisor output about sevenfold with no detectable loss, and advisor prompt caching breaks even at around three calls per conversation.
  • Advising inverts OpenAI's up-front routing. The host contrasts ChatGPT's router, which decides which model answers before generation starts, with an executor that escalates itself mid-task with full context; OpenRouter launched a cross-provider advisor in June, citing a 67x per-token price gap. His advice is to evaluate executor solo, executor plus advisor and advisor solo on your own workload, and his view is that frontier progress is increasingly about composing existing models economically.
Professor G MarketsTrump's Primetime Speech is About Setting a Trap for Democrats
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
Professor G MarketsThe New Playbook for Resisting Authoritarianism — with Julia Angwin & Ami Fields-Meyer
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
AI Analyst LabBuild Your AI Analyst — 16 Free Live Sessions
  • Claude answers a bad question as confidently as a good one. The speaker gives this as the reason for the lab's free "Build Your AI Analyst" series: 16 weekly live sessions from July through October. It opens with Product Analytics 101, which starts from the decision to be made rather than the dashboard at hand. The announced topics include full analyses on open-source models, pitched as cheaper and more secure, semantic layers so that the same question gets the same answer every time, and AI data science and analytics interviews.
Loss DogSoftware Stocks Crash: Contrarian Strategy for Profit #stockmarket #wearelossdog #tradingstrategy
  • A divergence between rallying banks and a crashing IBM is read as a buying signal in oversold software names. One host says he's begun nibbling from the long side via selling puts in IBM, Oracle and CoreWeave, despite not being a fan of IBM or Oracle, specifically because he sees them as grossly oversold relative to the rest of the market.
Scott HanselmanThe way you get developers to care is put them on call
  • Putting developers on call makes them care about customers. One speaker says on-call duty aligns a developer's pain with the customer's, and "pain is nature's teacher"; separated from that pain, "you're not a good developer". The other extends it: muscles and brains need to hurt a little to grow, long-form learning becoming snackable TikToks is a loss, and every interaction with a person has friction, "and that's why it's valuable".
Polis PanditWhy America Loses at Soccer But Dominates Elsewhere
  • FIFA's solidarity payment system gives European youth clubs a property right in the players they develop. Under rules covering development from age 12 onward, 5% of every international transfer fee flows back to every club that trained the player, automated since 2022 through a Paris clearinghouse — no lawsuits or lobbying required.
  • America is one of the only major football economies that refuses to connect to that system. U.S. Soccer told European buyers no "solidarity money" needed to be set aside, so a youth club like Seattle's Crossfire Premier, which developed DeAndre Yedlin, filed a valid FIFA claim on his transfer and was denied.
  • Because U.S. youth clubs can't earn from a player's future transfer, they earn from enrollment instead. Parents become the customer rather than the kid being the asset, pushing clubs toward retention products like trophies and showcase tournaments; elite pathways can run $8,000-$20,000 a year, and about 70% of players quit by age 14.
  • Germany and Belgium proved the system is fixable. After humiliating losses around 2000, both countries mandated development-first youth academies indifferent to early winning, producing the generations (Özil, Kroos, Hazard, De Bruyne) that later won or dominated major tournaments — while U.S. Soccer's declared "neutrality" since a deadlocked 2015 meeting functions as a veto on reform.
grantsandersonBut what is cross-entropy? | Compression is Intelligence Part 2
synopsis

The video reframes language-model training: using cross-entropy loss is the same as training the model to be the best possible text compressor. Cross entropy is the average bits per symbol when a code built for one distribution is used on messages that actually follow another, and it's minimized exactly when the two match — at which point it equals the true distribution's own entropy.

Compression origins. Cross entropy is motivated with a toy robot-instruction example: a code optimized for a 50/25/12.5/12.5% distribution over "up/down/left/right" costs one, two, and three bits per symbol respectively. When the true distribution shifts to favor "right" (50%) while "up"/"down" drop to 12.5% and "left" stays at 25%, but the old code is still used, the average cost rises to 2.625 bits per instruction.

The minimizing property. Graphing cross entropy for two-outcome distributions shows it forms a curve in Q that bottoms out exactly where Q equals P, and that minimum traces out the entropy of P as P varies — the property that makes cross entropy a natural loss function.

An unexpected 2002 precedent. A paper on "language trees and zipping" showed gzip alone — appending a snippet of one document to another and comparing compressed sizes — approximates cross entropy well enough to cluster documents by language and reconstruct trees of linguistic relatedness, with no built-in knowledge of linguistics.

Training as compression. A language model's pre-training loss is the average information — negative log probability — it assigns the true next token: literally the cross entropy of the model's predictions against the one-hot true tokens. A Lagrange-multiplier argument on a repeated pattern like "my name is ___" shows the logarithm isn't arbitrary: it's the only per-token loss function that forces the total loss to be minimized exactly when the model's output matches the data's true statistics.

Distillation and KL divergence. Training a small model against a large model's full output distribution, instead of one-hot targets, gives a richer per-example signal. The video closes by defining KL divergence as the gap between cross entropy and entropy — the bits wasted by an imperfect code — an asymmetric quantity that also underlies distillation.

  • Cross entropy measures the cost of using the wrong code. It's the average bits per symbol when a code optimized for one distribution (Q) gets used on symbols that actually follow another (P). In the video's robot-instruction toy example, a code optimized for a 50/25/12.5/12.5% split costs 2.625 bits per instruction once the true distribution shifts to 12.5/12.5/25/50%.
  • Cross entropy hits its minimum only when the two distributions match. At that point its value equals the entropy of the true distribution P — the reason it makes a sound loss function. A Lagrange-multiplier argument on a "my name is ___" example shows this property forces the per-token loss to be a logarithm specifically, rather than any other decreasing function of probability.
  • A 2002 gzip trick reconstructs language-family trees from compression alone. Appending a snippet of one document to another and comparing the compressed file sizes approximates cross entropy — how well one text's patterns compress another's — letting researchers cluster and even rank the relatedness of languages purely from resulting file sizes, without any built-in linguistic knowledge.
Professor G MarketsSpaceX Is Down 40% — How Low Can It Go?
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
All Things FinancialAsymmetric Financialization of the AI Compute Stack
  • The load-bearing finding is an inversion no processing business in the industrial record has run. CoreWeave is about to be able to hedge its revenue and still not its cost of goods: compute-hours are acquiring a cleared, cash-settled forward curve via ICE/Ornn's OCPI, CME/Silicon Data and ICE/NATIVX's COIL, while DRAM and NAND are not. A refiner hedges crude and sells product spot — input hedged, output exposed. CoreWeave would hedge the product and eat the crude. The structural reason is that compute is homogeneous, metered and continuously quoted across hundreds of sellers, which is what an index needs, while memory is a heterogeneous good sold by a handful of manufacturers under bilateral contract. The same concentration that makes a price floor the supplier's to demand is what makes that floor unhedgeable.
  • Primary-source work reversed the secondary reporting and, in doing so, dated the capitulation. CoreWeave's FY2025 10-K states verbatim that it has "no long-term contracts or arrangements with our suppliers that guarantee capacity," procuring on individual purchase orders — an affirmative statement of the opposite, made under Exchange Act liability. Any floor was therefore signed after the 31 March 10-Q cutoff, roughly April to June 2026. That reframes the thread: this is a company that ran purchase-order-only procurement for its entire operating history and abandoned it this year, in precisely the window when half of surveyed providers were sold out of Hopper capacity. It bought a floor because purchase orders stopped getting filled, not because it wanted price certainty.
  • The hedge stack is credit-driven rather than risk-driven, which reframes what the Reuters story actually is. The Q1 2026 10-Q discloses every derivative held: $1,285m notional of interest rate swaps, $1,565m of FX forwards, and power purchase agreements. Rates and power are both requirements of the DDTL 4.0 facility; FX is treasury housekeeping. Not one position reflects management independently choosing to hedge an input, and no lender is asking for a memory hedge because the debt is secured on GPUs and data centres, not on memory margin. Separately, un-remediated material weaknesses in internal control — IT general controls, segregation of duties, insufficient qualified accounting staff — may better explain "early-stage discussions, no counterparty, nothing executed" than market structure does: a Level 2 proxy hedge marking through earnings needs competence the company has told the SEC it lacks.
  • The document argues against itself in public, which is the most unusual thing about it. It records counter-evidence that supplier concentration is falling — 90% across the top three in FY2023 to 76% then 60% — conceding the concentration claim must be made about the upstream DRAM/NAND oligopoly, which it flags as "almost certainly true and entirely unsourced." It logs a retrieval failure on Item 7A and instructs that nothing be inferred from the absence. It flags that floor-versus-collar is unresolved and "changes the size of the problem by an order of magnitude." And it traces how Reuters' categorical claim that many deals in the class carry floors became "CoreWeave's contracts have floors" within hours with no new source added. Scale context: revenue $229m to $1.9bn to $5.1bn across FY2023–25 against net losses of $594m, $863m and $1.2bn, $60.7bn of remaining performance obligations, 67% revenue concentration in Microsoft alone, $21.6bn of debt, and 3.1GW contracted power against over 850MW active.
Stock TokThe StockTok ETF Keeps Pulling Away
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
Scott HanselmanThe Convenience Store Price of Compute
  • On-demand cloud pricing is a convenience-store price for prototyping. One speaker contrasts about 900 Advil for $25 at Costco with two for $5 at a Hilton. The other agrees on-demand is almost a promotional price, the place to prototype, but says running a workload for real makes commitments imperative, perhaps starting shorter than one year.
All Things FinancialCoreWeave debt covenants: old chips age fast; the revenue curve ages faster 7-15-2026
  • Government equity participation rescues the equity and leaves the debt holders exposed — that is the danger he is pointing at. These deals typically run 25 years with the first five interest-only, then amortizing a twentieth annually over the remaining twenty. The revenue from chips in a data centre is what services that debt, and CoreWeave's free cash flow is now running near -20% while operating income declines. The token-price analogy he borrows makes the revenue problem vivid: OpenAI and Anthropic selling a million tokens at roughly "$26 a barrel," Anthropic's latest model at $56, against $1.00–1.50 from Musk, Zuckerberg and Pichai, and $0.50 from the Chinese.
  • The depreciation mismatch and the rental collapse compound each other. H100 rentals fell from roughly $8/hr to $2.85–3.50, down 64%, with the market median now $2.29–3.12. Burry's argument is that hyperscalers depreciate over five to six years chips that actually last two to three, flattering profit by something like $176–178B. Meanwhile the B200 rental index rose 24% in March 2026 while the H100 barely moved — the frontier tier prices at a premium and the trailing tier commoditizes, which is a normal asset-vintage schedule and not, by itself, a demand bust.
  • He explains the price-floor exposure in the plainest possible terms, and flags the filing that settles it. Buy a chip at $100, watch it reprice to $40, but hold a contractual floor at $60 — CoreWeave owns the $20 gap. On the revenue side, three compute-index products announced in May and July should be live around August or September, so revenue becomes hedgeable while the input does not. He notes the tension directly: CoreWeave's own SEC filing says it has no floors, while Micron and SanDisk say their contracts contain them, and the next quarterly filing is where that gets resolved.
AI Analyst LabClaude 10x'd your output. Not your impact.
  • More output pays only if a decision loop surrounds it. The speaker's loop is to name the decision (what call, who makes it; if nothing changes either way, skip the work), then sharpen the vague ask into an answerable question. When Claude hands over a convincing number, ask what would have to be true for it to be wrong and check that one thing. Then go back a month later to see whether the number moved as predicted. They note that a good question alone is not enough, because Claude answers a bad one just as well.
Professor G MarketsIs an MBA Still Worth It? and the Future of Legacy Media
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
GeoHussarThe war is back on against Iran. #geopolitics #iran #persiangulf #straitofhormuz #war
  • A "second wave" of the war has begun, he says. It was triggered by a US strike on a bridge Russia and China had reportedly been using to move goods to and from Iran, both of which had warned the US against re-engaging; oil rose only 5–7%, which he attributes to the world being desensitized and prepared this time.
  • Iran's strike capacity has fallen to about 8% of February's level. He estimates this is likely from destroyed munitions, and invokes the 2002 Millennium Challenge war game — where cheap speedboat-launched rockets sank a simulated US fleet — as a reminder that a low-tech asymmetric threat, not conventional firepower, is what closed the Strait of Hormuz.
  • Iran has struck four countries but avoided the UAE and Saudi Arabia. Iran hit Israel, Kuwait, Bahrain and Jordan but has held off the two Gulf states that already retaliated once; he also flags that Israel — with Hezbollah already hobbled and thus no two-front risk — has still not launched its own attacks, calling the delay "interesting."
Scott HanselmanScott & Mark Learn To...Polypost: A Multi-Platform Post Editor
synopsis

Mark's answer to why AI alternately disappoints and astonishes is that failures come when work is "out of distribution": new, complex and large. The episode tests that against two weekend tools, PolyPost, which went smoothly, and ZoomIt for Mac, finished to Mark's standard in two days of heavy prompting yet still tripped by its one algorithmic feature.

Out of distribution. Mark says AI research projects, with many permutations and logs, are where agents go off the rails, while tools and websites "just fly". In Hanselman's experience, small Windows utilities succeed because they draw lines to the well-understood Win32 surface.

PolyPost. Tired of clunky LinkedIn formatters built on a Unicode hack that confuses screen readers, and of shuttling chatbot drafts between sites, Mark built an editor that drafts in a set style and shrinks posts for Threads, after first writing a browser extension. Hanselman, who uses no AI to write, suggested the PWA and wants shrinking but never expansion. Mark calls it "totally vibed" but says "it doesn't see what I see": overflowing toolbars, and gaps between previews it claimed to have fixed.

ZoomIt for Mac. Working from the PowerToys source feature by feature, Mark had parity by Sunday night; video recording with a webcam inset took a few prompts and demo type about 15 minutes. A quarter of the time went on pops the agent tested itself and declared fixed; the cause was a hand brushing the MacBook's microphone in the left speaker grill.

Panorama. Told to copy the Windows algorithm exactly, the agent kept regressing until Mark had it list every difference between the codebases. Hanselman argues source code acts as an implicit prompt. Mark uses 1-million-token contexts with GPT-5.5 and Opus 4.8, firing whichever frustrates.

  • AI coding fails out of distribution and flies within it. Mark says the failures come on AI research projects that are new, complicated and large in permutations and log files, while tools and websites close to the distribution "just fly". In Hanselman's experience, small Windows utilities work because they draw lines to a well-understood Win32 API surface; bespoke work with no API underneath gets complicated.
  • PolyPost authors posts with AI and reformats them per platform. Mark built it to replace clunky third-party LinkedIn formatters, which rely on a Unicode hack that screen readers mishandle, and the shuttle between chatbot drafts, formatter and LinkedIn; it drafts in a set style and shrinks posts for Threads. A LinkedIn browser extension came first; Hanselman, who uses no AI to write, suggested making it a PWA and wants shrinking to fit but never expansion.
  • Even in-distribution vibing needs steering because "it doesn't see what I see". Mark calls PolyPost "totally vibed" JavaScript built over a couple of days, yet kept correcting overflowing toolbars, an odd hide-editor bar and vertical gaps between previews that the agent claimed to have fixed until shown a screenshot. Mark calls those taste problems, obvious to a human and invisible to the model.
  • ZoomIt for Mac reached feature parity in a weekend. Starting from the open-source PowerToys code, Mark added features one at a time and by Sunday night had drawing, live zoom, multi-monitor and video recording with a webcam inset; demo type, requested by a LinkedIn commenter, took about 15 minutes. About a quarter of the time went on pops and swishes the agent tested and declared fixed, which turned out to be Mark's hand brushing a microphone in the MacBook's left speaker grill.
  • A reference implementation still did not keep the agent on track. Told to copy the Windows Panorama algorithm exactly, the agent regressed for a couple of hours until Mark had it list every difference between the Windows and Mac code. Hanselman argues source code acts as an implicit prompt; Mark uses 1-million-token contexts with GPT-5.5 and Opus 4.8 and fires whichever one frustrates.
Professor G MarketsWhy America’s Inflation Problem Isn’t Going Away
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
Technology and FriendsBruno Borges on Different Ways to User Microsoft Copilot [EPISODE 912]
  • The simplest Copilot workflow is assigning a GitHub issue to it. Borges, who works in developer relations at GitHub/Microsoft promoting these tools, describes the cloud coding agent on github.com picking up an assigned issue and drafting a pull request, which the developer refines through conversation in the PR, reviews carefully, then merges to trigger CI/CD.
  • AI-drafted code should get two human reviewers, not one. He argues the author of the intent is biased ("it's working, so I don't need a thorough review"), and that before AI every change already had two reviewers, because writing code is itself continuous reviewing; keeping two humans preserves that count.
  • Use the CLI for parallel, long-running agents and the IDE for focus. Borges says agent tasks can take 5 minutes or 50, so background research suits terminal windows, while reviewing, debugging and business logic suit the IDE; the CLI also works with repos hosted outside github.com. He still uses the CLI for quick jobs such as purging old off-topic social posts and a Namecheap DNS skill he published in the awesome-copilot repo.
  • The new Copilot app sits between CLI and IDE. It does not edit code, but gives a visual, mouse-driven multi-agent, multi-repo view with guidance hints, and has been his go-to for about 3–4 months; he says GitHub is converging the app, the CLI and the IDE plugins on the same agent harness behind Copilot CLI.
  • Canvas extensions let AI build small in-repo tools inside the app. Released about a month before the 8 July 2026 recording, they load in a side panel and can start AI sessions through the Copilot SDK; his example is an AI-generated page comparing browser-rendered SVGs with PNGs from his Java library and rival converters, without publishing to a marketplace. He expects this customization ecosystem to drive adoption, and calls building on the SDK itself a case-by-case decision.
Scott HanselmanYou don't vibe into production
  • AI produces code faster than one person can absorb it. One speaker rejects claims that code and tokens are now free and declines to "let the code wash over you". The other says you are not vibing into production if you are not on call, because sleeping through generated code becomes a problem when production goes down.
  • The book's second edition follows O'Reilly's usual cycle. The speaker says O'Reilly asks for a second edition 2–3 years after a successful book because technology changes; the first edition ran about 250 pages and took 3½ years because they were chasing a moving target.
Professor G MarketsThe Hormuz Blockade is Back — Here’s What Trump Wants
  • This post includes paid content that is not available publicly. See the original source.
Dr. Jon Krohn1009: Why the Best AI Stories Aren't About AI (with Steve Mock)
synopsis

Steve Mock, an investor at Blumberg Capital and a longtime friend and mentor of the host, ends up arguing that what AI is for shows up in human outcomes, not in speeds and feeds. His story site, built by a self-described proud non-programmer, is meant to give newcomers healthy patterns of use and warn them off unhealthy ones. As an investor, he holds that the lasting edge in AI companies is a head start in data that a rival cannot copy by rebuilding the software.

Why the site exists. His 84-year-old father asked how one uses AI, and Mock could not answer. Everything his father read said AI was dangerous or would take jobs, and the example prompts in chat interfaces skew technical. The name came from a portfolio company's lung-cancer testimonials and from everyday speech ("AI saved my butt"). Mock grants that the environmental and energy concerns are legitimate. His point is that many people simply do not know the positive uses.

Human outcomes. He feared developers reporting code compiled 4% faster. Instead the stories were about people. A founder who emigrated from China at two used ChatGPT and WeChat to explain her career change to relatives and felt "fully understood" for the first time in years. A father used AI to make sense of conflicting expert advice on his autistic son and said it helped him "show up as a better father." Healthcare: advocate, don't diagnose. Mock sees a best-practice layer forming within categories. In healthcare nobody on the site asks AI for medical advice. They learn their condition and bring sharper questions to providers. One owner's LLM-suggested diagnosis for her chronically ill dog was confirmed by her vets. The host relays a relative who, after Parkinson's medication increases made symptoms worse, consulted AI and got a different diagnosis from another physician. Mock's standout case is an Australian data scientist who sequenced his dog's tumours, found an experimental match, was refused a sale, had a custom treatment made, and saw all but one tumour shrink within a month. A second treatment followed for the remaining tumour, which was a different cancer.

Education and fulfilment. His sister, a teacher, argues with him over right and wrong uses. Good uses on the site include generated practice exams for a nurse-practitioner credential, an AI stand-in for unreachable office hours, and a summer training plan for a javelin thrower. Under fulfilment he means people spending time on work they like: a designer who can now build his own ideas, and a programmer happy at work "for the first time in my life." Others include a 72-year-old off-grid homesteader, a young Gambian who learned development on a smartphone, and a banker who vibe-coded an anti-scam app for his parents. On dependency, his aim is to collect healthy uses and warn about bad ones.

Building without code. He first used Lovable to make an online gallery of his late grandfather's art, hit its limits, and moved to Cursor with Claude. His workflow: long design discussions in ChatGPT, a five-page prompt pasted into Cursor, a build report pasted back for review. "AI managing the AI," he says, supplies safeguards he would not think of. Submitters taught him context files and skills, which he now uses at work too.

What makes an AI startup investable. Blumberg, founded over 35 years ago, backs mostly B2B software and now vertical AI in auditing, legal and mining. Mock looks for vertical experts with an insight incumbents cannot act on, and for data flywheels: a two-to-three-year lead in data and learning that later entrants cannot close. Deep tech, such as a mineral-prospecting company he calls about a thousand times more accurate, is funded milestone by milestone: first prove the technology works, then de-risk and scale. In the end he bets on resilient founders who can navigate a roadmap that will change.

  • The best AI stories are about human outcomes, not technology. Mock built the AI Saved Me story site after his 84-year-old father asked how one uses AI, and he feared developers bragging about faster code. Instead most submissions describe benefits such as a founder who used ChatGPT and WeChat to explain her career change to relatives in China ("For the first time in years, I felt fully understood"), or a father who used AI to sort conflicting expert advice on his autistic son's care.
  • In healthcare, use AI to become your own advocate, not your doctor. The pattern Mock sees is people educating themselves on their condition so they can ask providers better questions. His examples include a dog owner whose LLM-suggested disease her vets then confirmed by test, and an Australian data scientist who had his dog's tumours sequenced, matched them to an experimental treatment, had a custom version made when he could not buy it, and saw all but one tumour shrink within a month.
  • Good AI use augments learning and frees time for fulfilling work. Mock cites a nurse-practitioner candidate who generated practice tests, a working student who simulated the professor whose office hours he could not attend, and a designer and a programmer who say building their own ideas made them happier at work. His argument is that as AI takes tasks people dislike, more time goes to what they want to do, including time with family.
  • A non-programmer can ship a site by having AI manage AI. Mock, who had always worked on the business side, used ChatGPT as architect and product manager to write long prompts for Cursor with Claude as coder and QA, then fed Cursor's build reports back to ChatGPT. He says project context files and Claude skills, learned from submitters, were a game changer, and that the experience now tells him which pitches are easy to build: "if I could write the code, we definitely should not be investing."
  • In AI startups, the durable moat is a data flywheel. At Blumberg Capital, which invests mainly in B2B and vertical AI, Mock looks for teams with deep vertical expertise and an insight incumbents structurally cannot copy; a two-to-three-year head start in data and recursive learning cannot be bought by rebuilding the software later. For deep tech such as a portfolio company he says is about a thousand times more accurate at mineral prospecting, each round funds proof of the next milestone, and the bet is on resilient founders rather than a fixed roadmap.